Hi Nelson
You are so close!! Just hang in there (literally) :)
This sense is a mix of sensations, especially in the eye, mental images of “Nelson”, an “I” thought claiming to be having this experience, and a lot of doubts. There seems to be something more, but I’m unable to grasp it.
Yes, the sense of "happening to Nelson" is just sensations, mental images, and thoughts claiming ownership—nothing more.
Now, look at this "something more" that feels just out of reach.
What is it made of? Can it actually be found? Or is it just another subtle assumption, a feeling that something must be there, even when nothing can be located?
Right now—without trying to grasp anything—what remains?
If there’s no experiencer, can there still be an experience owned by someone?
I don’t know…
Perfect. Stay there. Don’t reach for an answer.
Right now,
without looking for certainty—is there actually a problem?
Does experience need an owner? Or is experience just happening, regardless of what thought says?
Look directly—isn’t it already just this, unfolding effortlessly?
Yes, and thoughts say otherwise, creating theories. There is some frustration here. Sometimes I feel like screaming :) I spend a litlte more time just trying to stay with this, ignoring these thoughts. I will continue tomorrow. Thank you.
Of course it is frustrating! It’s just this, centerless, effortless, indescribable—yet thoughts keep weaving theories over it. That’s their habit. But none of them touch what’s actually here.
Frustration? Let it be. Even that is just more happening, more unfolding. No one owns it.
And screaming? Why not? What would be screaming, anyway? Let it all burn through.
No need to “ignore thoughts” tomorrow—this is already here, now, and never left.
Good. Stay here. No escape.
Notice the sheer rawness of this frustration—not the story, not the label "frustration," but the physical sensation of it. That heaviness in the chest, the contraction—
what is it, really? What is there before thought turns it into "frustration"? Drop every single explanation. "I need to solve this", “I need to awaken and it’s not happening”, "It can't be just that, there should be more in how it feels"—those are just noise,
aren't they? Just more thoughts appearing and being believed.
But the sensation itself—does it say anything?
Now, go deeper. Without trying to get rid of it, without trying to resolve it—
what is it like to be completely consumed by this sensation? Make it bigger-enlarge it to fill up the room. Let yourself drown in it.
If control is an illusion, if the belief in control is what fuels this grasping, then what happens when you completely let go? Not pretend to let go, not "watch it," but actually surrender to the absolute helplessness of it all?
No escape. No "working through it, trying to change it." No labels. No control. Just this
There’s no one there, just the unfolding of what was always inevitable.
I have some difficult with this one. Doubts sometimes are important, aren’t they? When people relied solely on their direct experience of the sun rising and setting, they believed that the sun circled the Earth. It was doubt and research that revealed their direct experience was misleading and that, in reality, the Earth circled the sun. I’m not really doubting what you said, just expressing what’s on my mind, so you know.
That’s good—this isn’t about blind acceptance. It’s about
seeing clearly.
Doubt can be useful when it drives investigation.
But what’s happening right now? Is doubt appearing as an active inquiry, or is it more like a subtle hesitation, a reflex trying to re-establish a sense of stability?
Because look—
when people believed the sun circled the Earth, was it direct experience that misled them? Or was it the interpretation of experience? The assumption that what appears a certain way must be a certain way?
Direct experience never said, “The sun circles the Earth.” Thought did.
What are "Sun" and "Earth" in DE anyway?
Right now, what is direct experience actually saying about choice and control?
Without referring to thought, can you find anything being controlled?
Look at “research” in real time.
A question arises. Then—without choosing—attention moves toward information. Thoughts compare, analyse, connect ideas. Insights appear.
Where in that sequence did “you” do anything? Did you choose which thoughts would arise, which connections would be made, which insights would click?
Or did it all simply happen, unfolding moment by moment, just like breathing, just like the beating of the heart?
If research is just this automatic unfolding, where is the researcher?
Is doubt
yours and is it
your responsibility to resolve?
It is more a doubt than a precise description. It is a doubt that “maybe I am the body having this conscious experience” - I know we already explored this, and that the body itself is just an idea, and that there is just colors, sounds, sensations, etc.
Good—this doubt is just another ripple in the system, another thought appearing. But look:
Right now,
does the experience of a body confirm a separate “I”? Or is that just a thought about the body, looping back in to claim ownership?
Check in real-time:
Colors appear.
Do they belong to anyone?
Sensations arise.
Is there a "you" inside them, or are they just happening?
Sounds, thoughts, movements— are any of them actually proving an “I” that has them?
If the body itself is just a collection of sensations and labels, then where exactly is the one having the experience? Can it be found? Or is it just another assumption sneaking in?
Love
Rali
“Your assumptions are your windows on the world. Scrub them off every once in a while, or the light won't come in.”
― Alan Alda
"The moment I am aware that I am aware I am not aware. Awareness means the observer is not"
― Jiddu Krishnamurti