Yes. Weirdly though, I'm more worried about missing something than doing something wrong. I fear I might just continue to go in circles and overlook what I need to see. One analogy that comes to mind is looking into a lake and failing to see your face reflecting on the surface, until someone points it out. I can hear and conceptually understand that these thoughts are the very thing that are keeping me under the spell, but I'm not experiencing it - and part of me seems to not accept it.What makes you drawn to more handholding? Are you worried you may "miss something"? Are you worried you may do things wrong?
Yes to the latter. If I stop entertaining those thoughts and look at the blanket in front of me, those thoughts lose a lot of their substance and power. But there is still in the background a kind of echo, at least for a while, and the nagging sense that "I should really be paying attention to them". As I indulge these thoughts, I have to consciously rebuild the narrative, which ironically doesn't comes naturally. In a sense, I do experience that stuff in the form of feelings, like a shortness of breath in my chest.When you look now, do you find anything in your experience called "stuff you may have crafted and are not aware of that is holding you back"? Or is this just something you imagine, and then worry about?
"I don't know what I don't know" comes to mind from the real of conceptual understanding. Not being aware of non-duality being a possibility sounds like it would reduce the chances of looking and experiencing it. Apparently this happens in rare cases still, but doesn't seem to be the norm. This is one of the base assumption that is fueling all this. In the same way, there might be more ideas/concepts my mind hasn't been in contact with which paradoxically would soften its grasp. There is also the assumption that the answer is in the "doing". I really don't like that one being challenged.
Yes. I could argue I'm not after a checklist that guarantees success but more of a "due diligence" kind of checklist, "I did my part". This sounds like a refinement to try and work around, hide or justify the need for reassurance though.It sounds like you're looking for reassurance, like you want a checklist of conditioning that you can tick off so you can feel like you're making progress and getting closer to "awakening" or whatever you're looking for here.
Processes reassure me, as they relieve me of the responsibility of mistakes to some extent. They are also predictable. So yes I naturally find myself mapping processes onto life, to try and manage what can be automated (including at the level of thoughts).
I'm not sure I get it, what does "this" refer to here? Not avoiding the sensations that arise?If there's anything you should investigate, it's this
As I'm writing, two of those uncomfortable situations occurred. People coming to my desk and interrupting my train of thoughts. I think what makes this uncomfortable is:Bring up these uncomfortable situations. Tell me why you think they're uncomfortable. Tell me how you reacted.
- risking to lose an important thought
- exerting effort to find it again
I think I see thoughts as currency, and effort as a resource, both of which feel limited and precious, and not to be squandered. These are resources I use to assert my value, be seen and appreciated. I could venture this might go back to childhood, where getting good grades was a way to access my parents love.
How I reacted?
Inside, I feel an immense impatience and rage, again in my chest. I just want to scream.
From the outside, I think I come off impatient, cold and distant, since I'm doing everything on the fringe of being socially acceptable to end the interaction as fast as possible: monosyllabic answers, not sustaining eye contact, impatience in my tone.
Note that this is even before any content is exchanged. The content itself might aggravate this discomfort further. For instance, the interruption might somewhat turns into an argument, or is something I disagree with. Then another layer of urge surfaces, proving the other wrong and destroying them through the power of thoughts. You can imagine the layer of self-judgment that comes with this.
----
Some meta points: I'm unhappy about these answers. They feel like two steps back. There is also probably a lot of repetition from previous answers. I was somehow starting to feel some relief from from the need to understand and conceptualize, but as I kept writing, only the conceptual stuff poured through. Even now, I'm debating the "shoulds" of how I approach it, and this feels important and in need of attention. And I can sense of level of recursion going on, fuelled by "maybe this should be approached differently", "maybe looking at it differently should be looked at differently", etc..
A part of me is amused by the nonsense though, another part is exhausted by the unmanageable complexity.
---
Thanks for the follow-up questions, let me get back to you in a bit on those.

