Recognizing my non-dual nature

All threads where seeing happens are stored here. The complete list, sorted by guide, contains all links. The archives include threads of those that came to LU already seeing as well.
You are welcome to continue your conversation with your guide here after your name is turned blue.
User avatar
Noro
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:42 pm

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Noro » Fri Dec 27, 2024 4:26 pm

Hi Thomas,

Awesome inquiry!
Who is actually looking or searching for a me? The space feels more peaceful after asking that question.
Great, it is amazing how picking the right question can lighten the intensity.
Questions like: What wants to hold on? What wants to let go? Can be also very effective.

Going back to the concept of IFS, what is happening here with this inquiry is that there is a an impulse (part) to see through the illusion and at the same time there is a resistance (part) holding on to the illusion.
Feeling uncomfortable makes me want to grab my guitar to get distracted. It feels like such a strong bodily urge to seek distraction, almost the feeling of an addiction.
Intense....stay with that feeling of an addiction, look at it with wonder and curiosity! And if the urge to play the guitar takes precedence, watch that with amazement! :)
I am feeling some frustration now for never being able to find myself, but somehow still living in the illusionary perspective that this is the case. Although perceptions are changing lately. And also the frustration is dissapearing realizing that it is a thought. The sensations in the body can be there, I can't control them.
Frustration is par for the course!
Is there a separate 'you' feeling the frustration?


INTRODUCTORY BODY EXERCISE

Sit with eyes closed for about 15 minutes. Paying attention only to the pure sensations, without relying on thoughts or mental images: From DE / Non-conceptual Awareness:

Can it be known how tall the body is?
Does the body have a weight or volume?
In the actual experience does the body have a shape or a form?

Is there a boundary between the body and the clothing?
Is there a boundary between the body and the chair?

Is there an inside or an outside?
If there is an inside - the inside of what exactly?
If there is an outside - the outside of what exactly?

What does the word/label ‘body’ actually refer to?
What is the ACTUAL experience of the body?

Look very carefully, especially with the last question. Take your time, don’t rush. You can look several times during the day while doing other things (like washing hands, showering, having a short break from work, walking, etc) before replying.



With love,

Rowena
"Experience is an incredible explosion of energy appearing in inconceivable, infinite consciousness." Peter Brown, from Yoga of Radiant Presence,

User avatar
Secrethippie
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:38 am

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Secrethippie » Sat Dec 28, 2024 11:57 pm

Hi Rowena,
Going back to the concept of IFS, what is happening here with this inquiry is that there is a an impulse (part) to see through the illusion and at the same time there is a resistance (part) holding on to the illusion.
Hmm interesting, that is exactly how it feels. I guess IFS also explains the contradicting feeling that I sometimes get with certain actions I do. Part of me tells me to take care of myself and another part wants to be there for other people for instance.
Intense....stay with that feeling of an addiction, look at it with wonder and curiosity! And if the urge to play the guitar takes precedence, watch that with amazement! :)
Cool, so would you say it is important for now to not take any distractions from difficult sensations/feelings, but just to stay with them?
Is there a separate 'you' feeling the frustration?
No, there is the thought of frustration and the sensory experience. But no me experiencing frustration, but yeah you could say that there is frustration.
Can it be known how tall the body is?
Nope, no indication of that in direct experience
Does the body have a weight or volume?
Not a specific weight or volume. I can feel that the body has some weight, but it doesnt really matter in direct experience.
In the actual experience does the body have a shape or a form?
No it is an ever changing cloud of sensations
Is there a boundary between the body and the clothing?
One could say the skin, but in DE there is the thought of the skin and the direct sensory experience of the clothing on the skin. So outside of a thought there are just the sensations.
Is there a boundary between the body and the chair?
Only as a thought, but there is just the sensations around the back and sitting bones. Not possible to find a boundary if not using thoughts. And all of these thoughts are inaccurately depicting the exact boundary.
Is there an inside or an outside?
haha no, not really. Again as a thought yes, but there is just the sensory experience and thoughts. No inside or outside
If there is an inside - the inside of what exactly?
There is in inside in the body, but it only exists as a thought. Apart from that there is one space of experience, where all is happening. Inside and outside are happening in the same space.
If there is an outside - the outside of what exactly?
Outside and inside don't have a clear boundary. You could say the skin, but there are the sensations around the skin and thoughts of the skin. It is just one big spacious experience. It is difficult to find an exact inside and outside when looking for it.
What does the word/label ‘body’ actually refer to?
To the sensory experiences, that is were the label refers to. But any label is incomplete in that sense and just a thought.
What is the ACTUAL experience of the body?
The sensory experience, just that. One ever changing sensory experience. But nothing is seperate from this experience, sounds, tastes, smells, thoughts, all happen in the same space. There is no division between them or between outside and inside, it is just one big happening. Everything is welcome. In fact there is no way to not welcome anything. I feel like I am completely not in control. I notice the urge to do something else, but at the same time the investigation is winning more and more. But without effort, investigating and inquiry is just happening. Where am I in all this? I guess nowhere. Who is looking? There is just looking. Who is hearing? there is just hearing. Who is feeling? There is just feeling. What is this reality? Indescribable.
Look very carefully, especially with the last question. Take your time, don’t rush. You can look several times during the day while doing other things (like washing hands, showering, having a short break from work, walking, etc) before replying.
I tried to look as much as I could during activities, but noticed how quickly I got drawn into thoughts. Especially when there are other people involved, but in general thoughts really know how to take over attention. I did do 2 more of these 15 minutes of sitting with the sensations. The second time it got quite intens again, but I stayed with the tension. I really notice a strong contraction near the hips and in the lower belly. I remember that I felt it before during some breathwork sessions (that is the point I did not want to continue) and like I explained before in 10 meditations the past half year. It still seems to expand a bit, but the investigation stops at some point, because there is no full readyness to fully feel it yet. Readyness from who? No one, but it is not happening yet. I can have thoughts that urge me to do so, but these are just thoughts. There is no me in the whole process. But there is something powerful here. When I stick with the senses for a while, thoughts get transferred to the background, when getting in an intens moment I turn attention upon myself, ask myself where am I, and find nothing, from there the attention moves wherever it wants and ends with a lot of tension around the hips. I can still feel it, typing here. It is very intens, but super interesting to explore.

Looking forward to your reply, as always!

With love,
Thomas

User avatar
Noro
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:42 pm

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Noro » Sun Dec 29, 2024 1:58 pm

Hi Thomas,

Investigation into this 'being human' is so interesting and I am so glad that you are finding that as well! :)
I guess IFS also explains the contradicting feeling that I sometimes get with certain actions I do. Part of me tells me to take care of myself and another part wants to be there for other people for instance.
Yes, I find that it offers a great way to see how things are operating on a sub-level that seems to cause responses, reactions, aversions, procrastinations etc. All going on, none of it personal so long as the detached perspective is held. But sometimes 'merging' with a part through being triggered or habit can happen and then that provides a new opportunity to LOOK.

So, there are two drives (parts) that are not working in harmony. Clearly there is a young part that wants to be there for other people and this instinct arose naturally...because of social conditioning, or because it will get something (i.e. validation) to compensate for some deeper insecurity or need that has not yet been felt. So then the other part that is motivated towards self-care has to constantly negotiate with that part. An uncomfortable co-habitation!!

If you can FEEL into or INTUIT (not analyse) the drive to care for others, you think up completion sentences for deeper insight such as:
I want to be there for other people so that they ...................
When they appreciate me, this makes me feel .....................
When I am not willing to be there for other people, I feel......................
Now stay with the body sensations of that feeling as much as you can.

Cool, so would you say it is important for now to not take any distractions from difficult sensations/feelings, but just to stay with them?
Yes

No, there is the thought of frustration and the sensory experience. But no me experiencing frustration, but yeah you could say that there is frustration.
Yes, absolutely - frustration is happening!
And when you dive into the body sensations and let go of the thought label "frustration" what is left?

Not a specific weight or volume. I can feel that the body has some weight, but it doesnt really matter in direct experience.
How is weight known in DE? Is it this a thought concept?
Take away the thought concept, what is left? (Go back to DE)



One could say the skin, but in DE there is the thought of the skin and the direct sensory experience of the clothing on the skin.

In DE, How is skin known?
How is there a direct sensory experience of clothing on the skin? Is this not thought content of rational conclusion?
So outside of a thought there are just the sensations.
YES!

but there is just the sensations around the back and sitting bones.
More rational conclusions! There is a habit of creating a visual image of the body for mapping and orientation purposes, but can you see this IS ALL THOUGHT. And this is totally natural thing for the mind to do, but here we are not looking for what mental suggestions (thoughts) of what is obvious and rational.
In DE, can the back and sitting bones be known without thought?

The sensory experience, just that. One ever changing sensory experience. But nothing is seperate from this experience, sounds, tastes, smells, thoughts, all happen in the same space. There is no division between them or between outside and inside, it is just one big happening. Everything is welcome. In fact there is no way to not welcome anything. I feel like I am completely not in control. I notice the urge to do something else, but at the same time the investigation is winning more and more. But without effort, investigating and inquiry is just happening. Where am I in all this? I guess nowhere. Who is looking? There is just looking. Who is hearing? there is just hearing. Who is feeling? There is just feeling. What is this reality? Indescribable.
AWESOME! YES!
I tried to look as much as I could during activities, but noticed how quickly I got drawn into thoughts. Especially when there are other people involved, but in general thoughts really know how to take over attention.
When other people are around we naturally move into a mode of social engagement. Perhaps this analogy might be helpful.
Sitting in a stationary car, simply DE experiencing (as you wrote so beautifully in the paragraph above).
Then the car shifts from DE mode into gear and into social engagement mode, and if this revs up further, then gears shift up to a higher gear and then down again. Up and down... Stationary DE..... Up and down etc. a full spectrum of experiencing, and with no autonomous, independent car operator to be found!

It still seems to expand a bit, but the investigation stops at some point, because there is no full readyness to fully feel it yet. Readyness from who? No one, but it is not happening yet. I can have thoughts that urge me to do so, but these are just thoughts. There is no me in the whole process. But there is something powerful here. When I stick with the senses for a while, thoughts get transferred to the background, when getting in an intens moment I turn attention upon myself, ask myself where am I, and find nothing, from there the attention moves wherever it wants and ends with a lot of tension around the hips. I can still feel it, typing here. It is very intens, but super interesting to explore.
If there is not readiness to fully feel, that's OK. Short sessions of gentle exploration of this tension.
If you have a chance to look online into TRE there are some good explanatory videos and it might be a good way to get the energy moving in this area as the warm-up exercises allow the body to go into a natural shaking movement which helps release tension especially around the thighs, hips and lower torso.


DEEPER BODY INVESTIGATION

Here is an even deeper investigation of the body. Please follow each step, don't leave out any. Take your time. Don't move to the next step until the previous one is clearly seen. Remember all descriptions and explanations are thought overlay!

Repeat the exercise several times.

Stand in front of a bigger mirror.

(1) First, close the eyes and feel the sensations labelled ‘body’.

(2) Then open the eyes and look into the mirror while still paying attention to the sensations. Is there any connection between the felt sensations and the image in the mirror? Or just thoughts (and/or mental images) suggest that there is?

(3) While still paying attention to the sensations move one hand and observe the movement from the mirror. Is there any connection between the felt sensations (labelled ‘hand’) and image of movement in the mirror?

(4) Now do the same movement with the hand, but this time look at the hand directly, not from the mirror. Is there any connection between the felt sensations (labelled ‘hand’) and the image ‘of movement’? Or only thoughts suggest it?

(5) Now, pay attention only to the image in the mirror. Does the image by itself suggest in any way that is ‘you’ or ‘your body’? Does the image itself suggest in any way that it is a ‘body’ at all? Or are there only colours and shapes?

(6) Where the mirror ends, some parts of the body (probably legs) cannot be seen. Just by the image in the mirror, is there any ‘knowledge’ that there must be legs, or only thoughts and mental images suggest so?

(7) Now turn away from the mirror and look forward (don’t look directly to any body parts).

Is there a ‘body’ anywhere when all thoughts and images are ignored, or are there only sensations?

(8) Start to walk slowly.

Is there a ‘body walking’, or are there only sensations?
Is there actual experience of ‘walking’ at all?


Or just THOUGHTS ABOUT ‘walking’?

Can such a thing as ‘body’ be found OR just THOUGHTS ABOUT a ‘body’?

Can such a thing as ‘walking’ be found?

(9) Are the sensations localized in space, like ‘going through the room’; OR is there only an image that is labelled ‘room’ and appearing sensations without any location?



With love,
Rowena
"Experience is an incredible explosion of energy appearing in inconceivable, infinite consciousness." Peter Brown, from Yoga of Radiant Presence,

User avatar
Secrethippie
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:38 am

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Secrethippie » Mon Dec 30, 2024 10:07 pm

Hi Rowena,

I can imagine there is also a part that wants to experience the peace and fully embrace everything, but there is also a part that believes that I still need to improve or get better before I do so, maybe there is also a part trying to keep me safe.
If you can FEEL into or INTUIT (not analyse) the drive to care for others, you think up completion sentences for deeper insight such as:
I want to be there for other people so that they appreciate me
When they appreciate me, this makes me feel worthy
When I am not willing to be there for other people, I feel guilty
Now stay with the body sensations of that feeling as much as you can.
Very uncomfortable that feeling of guilt, but staying with it for a while it kinda loosens and becomes less intens
And when you dive into the body sensations and let go of the thought label "frustration" what is left?
Just a formation of sensations.
How is weight known in DE? Is it this a thought concept?
It is definitely a concept, you can't know it in DE
Take away the thought concept, what is left? (Go back to DE)
Sensations, sounds, sights, thoughts, taste
In DE, How is skin known?
Not, there is just the sensing, skin is a label and an imagination
How is there a direct sensory experience of clothing on the skin? Is this not thought content of rational conclusion?
There are just the sensations. The clothing is a thought and the skin is also a thought or imagination.
In DE, can the back and sitting bones be known without thought?
Yes I get what you are going at, it is all content of thoughts. Without zooming in to the content of thought, back and sitting bones are just labels. Even saying the area around the back and sitting bones is just thought. There is just this sensing and than there is the labeling, which can take many different labels, but a label is a label, just like a sensation is a sensation. The combination of the 2 can create the biggest illusions, but in DE there is nothing to say haha. Just this, and its gone. Just this, and its gone. Nothing to grab hold of. You can't even notice the changing, because it changes opposed to what? There is just this.... impossible te describe
When other people are around we naturally move into a mode of social engagement. Perhaps this analogy might be helpful.
Sitting in a stationary car, simply DE experiencing (as you wrote so beautifully in the paragraph above).
Then the car shifts from DE mode into gear and into social engagement mode, and if this revs up further, then gears shift up to a higher gear and then down again. Up and down... Stationary DE..... Up and down etc. a full spectrum of experiencing, and with no autonomous, independent car operator to be found!
Yes that is a nice example. The difficult thing about the social engagement mode is that is seems to recuire more thinking. At least, that is how the operating system seems to work. When the car shifts gear to that mode, the person sitting into the stationary car seems to automatically get more engaged in the thought sense. Involuntarily, but still it happens.
If there is not readiness to fully feel, that's OK. Short sessions of gentle exploration of this tension.
If you have a chance to look online into TRE there are some good explanatory videos and it might be a good way to get the energy moving in this area as the warm-up exercises allow the body to go into a natural shaking movement which helps release tension especially around the thighs, hips and lower torso.
I did some of the exercises. Of course, as a yoga teacher, large parts of those poses I already do regularily, but the shaking part is a nice addition. And very related to the fact that I start shaking when getting in an intense bodily meditation.
(1) First, close the eyes and feel the sensations labelled ‘body’.
(2) Then open the eyes and look into the mirror while still paying attention to the sensations. Is there any connection between the felt sensations and the image in the mirror? Or just thoughts (and/or mental images) suggest that there is?
There is the image of the body (which is without label, just image) and the sensations. Thoughts can only suggest a link between the body and the image.
(3) While still paying attention to the sensations move one hand and observe the movement from the mirror. Is there any connection between the felt sensations (labelled ‘hand’) and image of movement in the mirror?
There are the sensations in the hand, and there is the visual image of the hand moving. Then a thought comes to connect the two and explain causality
(4) Now do the same movement with the hand, but this time look at the hand directly, not from the mirror. Is there any connection between the felt sensations (labelled ‘hand’) and the image ‘of movement’? Or only thoughts suggest it?
There are just the sensations and the hand moving. Thoughts indeed create a very realistic (and logical) idea that there is a connection. But without a thought, there is no need for a connection. There are the sensations in the hand and the image, nothing more. There is also no idea of there being no connection, because that is also a thought.
(5) Now, pay attention only to the image in the mirror. Does the image by itself suggest in any way that is ‘you’ or ‘your body’? Does the image itself suggest in any way that it is a ‘body’ at all? Or are there only colours and shapes?
The image does not suggest that it is my body, or that it is me. Only thoughts can say so. The image does also not suggest that it is a body, because also that is a thought. Even saying that there are shapes and colours is a thought. In that sense, in pure DE there is just the image, just the looking, just the visual experience. And shape, or color classification would still need thought. There is just the image, where if having to use thoughts, the mirror is part of, I am part of, the background is part of, the periphery etc.
(6) Where the mirror ends, some parts of the body (probably legs) cannot be seen. Just by the image in the mirror, is there any ‘knowledge’ that there must be legs, or only thoughts and mental images suggest so?
Im trying not to focus on the content of the thoughts and only to stay with the image. When doing so, there is no body, there is no mirror, and so there are also no legs. Not in the mirror and not outside of the mirror. There is a mental projection of legs being there, but again that is thought content. There is just the image, just the looking.
(7) Now turn away from the mirror and look forward (don’t look directly to any body parts).
Is there a ‘body’ anywhere when all thoughts and images are ignored, or are there only sensations?
Aaah it is all just a thought haha. There are the sensations, there is the image (i wouldnt even say looking, because that would imply a voluntary action from me), and there are the thoughts. No body without the thoughts. But everything is a thought. The objects, my feelings and emotions, things happening in my life, myself. All just a thought haha. Me believing the thoughts is also a thought. It one enormous web of thoughts. There is no way to think yourself out of this web, it will only make it bigger. There is just the raw experience. Time and space are fading a bit, because also those are thoughts. Waha what? Its all just thoughts. But it stays thoughts until a very subtle level.
(8) Start to walk slowly.

Is there a ‘body walking’, or are there only sensations?
Is there actual experience of ‘walking’ at all?
There is only sensations, and thoughts coming by
There is the experience of the senses, the sensing. Walking is also a concept. It is an idea about something that is being done. It is a projection in the future. In DE there is just the sensing, the thinking, the hearing, the being, the seeing.

Or just THOUGHTS ABOUT ‘walking’?
Just thoughts and projection and imagination about walking, nothing else
Can such a thing as ‘body’ be found OR just THOUGHTS ABOUT a ‘body’?
It is just a thought yes, nothing more. The rational thinking tries to take over attention again, but science....
However, also just content of thought. Content of thought is not a reality. It is an effective method to make sense of reality and to communicatie with eachother, but it is false, because it bends reality and it creates a seperation between objects and between subject and object. But all of them are just thoughts. It are all ways to make sense of thoughts. It does not say anything about what is happening in the moment. Which is just this beingness. Beingness does not require a thought to take place, it is here right now. My whole spiritual career I have been trying to solve the identification with thinking by thinking, but it is simply impossible. Only by tuning into DE you can experience a reality where thoughts are seen for what they are, or rather, not are. But yeah, how to stay there? haha
Can such a thing as ‘walking’ be found?
No, there is the movement that is connected to sensing, all happening by itself. No one doing the movement. Even movement is a concept, but is for lack of better words.
(9) Are the sensations localized in space, like ‘going through the room’; OR is there only an image that is labelled ‘room’ and appearing sensations without any location?
The localization is a concept, a projection of the mind. Without that projection or thought, there are just the senses. The senses are sensing, independent of the location. Without thought there is no room, there is no me, its all one big space I guess, but than it is easy to create the image of one big space, which is still a thought. There is simply just the sensing and the image, and thoughts putting labels on as many objects as it can.

I did this exercise 3 times, especially the second time was amazing, very insightful. Thanks!

Loving regards,
Thomas

User avatar
Noro
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:42 pm

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Noro » Tue Dec 31, 2024 3:13 pm

Hi Thomas,
I can imagine there is also a part that wants to experience the peace and fully embrace everything, but there is also a part that believes that I still need to improve or get better before I do so, maybe there is also a part trying to keep me safe.
Yes, Ive come to think of it like that. IFS parts can be viewed as impersonal energies and thought patterns simply arising and some mechanism of habit/conditioning that connects an "I" or 'ME" thought to them.

Yes I get what you are going at, it is all content of thoughts. Without zooming in to the content of thought, back and sitting bones are just labels. Even saying the area around the back and sitting bones is just thought. There is just this sensing and than there is the labeling, which can take many different labels, but a label is a label, just like a sensation is a sensation. The combination of the 2 can create the biggest illusions, but in DE there is nothing to say haha. Just this, and its gone. Just this, and its gone. Nothing to grab hold of. You can't even notice the changing, because it changes opposed to what? There is just this.... impossible to describe
And yet, you have described this so beautifully! <3

Yes that is a nice example. The difficult thing about the social engagement mode is that is seems to recuire more thinking. At least, that is how the operating system seems to work. When the car shifts gear to that mode, the person sitting into the stationary car seems to automatically get more engaged in the thought sense. Involuntarily, but still it happens.
Yes, immediately the mind/thoughts take over.
See if you can become more aware of any change in body sensations when there is a shift from DE mode to engaging with social/conventional mode. Which mode feels more open and expansive?

Time and space are fading a bit, because also those are thoughts. Waha what? It's all just thoughts. But it stays thoughts until a very subtle level.
Well seen, all thoughts, all concepts!! And thoughts continue to operate at a very subtle level.

Find something in the visual field that you can label.
Settle your gaze on that 'object'.
Now look at the object, drop the label, and soften your gaze.
What's left?
How does this feel in the body?


Beingness does not require a thought to take place, it is here right now. My whole spiritual career I have been trying to solve the identification with thinking by thinking, but it is simply impossible. Only by tuning into DE you can experience a reality where thoughts are seen for what they are, or rather, not are. But yeah, how to stay there? haha
What is the need to stay there?
To what (who) does that need refer?




DRIVING AND READING ROAD SIGNS - Noticing thoughts - Visual Field.

Next time you are out driving on a calm stretch of road, bring your attention to a road sign coming up. Repeat the words of the sign in your head.
Notice if there are any sensations in your head as you do this.
Is the thought happening out there or inside your head?
Is there a line of separation between the sign and the thought?
Can it be found?


Now, when the next road sign comes up just notice the sign without saying the words to yourself.
Would you still know what the sign means?
Is the overlay of thought actually required to register the meaning of the directions?


When you see written words, do you need to think to register the meaning of those words?
What is it that is registering the meaning of those words?
Can a registerer of words be found in DE?



Finally, how is the impact of this inquiry showing up in daily life?
Answer from your current experience:
Do you think that an inherently independent self exists?
Do you feel that an inherently independent self exists?
Do you control events as they happen?
How important is intention? Is there an actual past or future?
How do you relate to your thoughts?
How do you relate to your emotions?
Has your relationship to other people changed?
How do you react when conflict/problems arise?
What is you relationship to life?
Are there doubts? If so, please describe them.
If you are not the separate self, who/what are you?


There is no right way to answer the above questions.
Try to be concise and honest with your answers, they are for review to show up any areas that could be investigated further.


With love,

Rowena
"Experience is an incredible explosion of energy appearing in inconceivable, infinite consciousness." Peter Brown, from Yoga of Radiant Presence,

User avatar
Secrethippie
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:38 am

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Secrethippie » Sat Jan 04, 2025 10:54 am

Hi Rowena,

It took me a bit longer to react. I was doing a little retreat with some friends and it was difficult to react and also I dont have a car, so was finding a way to do the exercise haha. I was really struggling with these thought exercises.
See if you can become more aware of any change in body sensations when there is a shift from DE mode to engaging with social/conventional mode. Which mode feels more open and expansive?
Yes DE feels more open and expansive, whereas Social mode seems contracted. The social engagement mode creates this narrow feeling.
Find something in the visual field that you can label.
Settle your gaze on that 'object'.
Now look at the object, drop the label, and soften your gaze.
What's left?
How does this feel in the body?
WHat is left is just the visual image
It feels expansive and calming, like a spacious peacefulness
What is the need to stay there?
The need to stay there I guess is the feeling that there is more to be realized from DE, but also to know that living in the content of thought is creating a lot of suffering.
To what (who) does that need refer?
Good question. No idea actually. I guess there is actually this feeling, intuition, sense that there is something pure in DE. Although there is a fear to loose the mind identification, there is also a fear to loose the touch with DE and fall back into complete mind identification again. Like happened a little bit more the past days. There is just this urge to not be mind identified anymore, because although I realize I am not a someone, my experience still feels uncomfortable a majority of the time.

DRIVING AND READING ROAD SIGNS - Noticing thoughts - Visual Field.
Next time you are out driving on a calm stretch of road, bring your attention to a road sign coming up. Repeat the words of the sign in your head.
Notice if there are any sensations in your head as you do this.
So it is a little bit difficult as I dont own a car. I took my bike and watched the signs in the city, but they are not clearly about a direction. However, when repeating the sign, there came some sensations at the front of my head.
Is the thought happening out there or inside your head?
It is very difficult to locate the thought. It feels to be happening in the area in the front of my head, however when looking for it, I can't find the exact location of the thought. Or even find what exactly the thought is.
Is there a line of separation between the sign and the thought?
No there is no clear line of seperation. The sign is an image and the thought is somehow the appearing of the letters somewhere in my consciousness together with the subvocal voice. But I can't find the thought, so it is impossible to find a line of seperation.
Can it be found?
No, in general when looking for clear boundaries they can't be found.

Code: Select all

Now, when the next road sign comes up just notice the sign without saying the words to yourself.
This seems almost impossible. I tried it a couple of times and everytime I read the letters it would be assisted by a subvocal voice. Like the voice that is subvocally talking now while typing and reading these letters. I am clearly not creating the voice, but it really seems to be there. However, is it really a voice? It doesnt make a sound. I can't pinpoint it, but is definitely feels like there is always a narrator of everything I read.
Would you still know what the sign means?
I am not sure about this, because I can't seem to detach the thought from seeing the sign. I am now looking in the room at a book called 'behaviour in organisations'. When reading that the words are subvocally said and I see the image of an organization. I can't imagine what it would be like if thoughts would not be used to understand it, because it seems to constantly be overlaying everything where I look at. It labels automatically and seems to be the only thing that can make sense of words.
Is the overlay of thought actually required to register the meaning of the directions?
So I can't say I could properly do this test with directions and signs, but generaly it appears that some form of thought is required to make sense of things and to find the meaning behind them. However, at the same time, I am typing right now, without thinking the words upfront. So something is making complete sentences and thereby making sense, without the need to actively think about it. Don't we need the content for thoughts at all?
When you see written words, do you need to think to register the meaning of those words?
Reading this question, I am answering without really thinking about it. I am not sure what is the answer that is being typed, but it seems that there are thoughts working anyways. I can't see how you can read words without the use of thought, as it happens automatically. Than what actually is a thought? This subvocal voice, combined with the visualizing of the letters and/or an image. I don't think you need to register the meaning of the words actively, but it seems to be happening all by itself. There is no one to actively register the meaning.
What is it that is registering the meaning of those words?
I have no idea. It seems like the words are formed into thoughts and they are just understood. But by who? I feel frustration now, because I clearly can't find this registerer, but it doesnt relieve me or something.
Can a registerer of words be found in DE?
Nowhere, that is the stupid thing. When really looking there only seems to be emptiness and yet shomehow words are being made sense of and thoughts seem to be the thing that makes this sense. But does it actually? Is there a way to make sense without thoughts? Words are coming out of nowhere, but to really read a book without using thoughts to understand it seems impossible. In DE there is thoughts, sensations, hearing, seeing. But doing activities completely in DE seems difficult.
Finally, how is the impact of this inquiry showing up in daily life?
The past few days there's seems to be a lot of frustration and inner chatter. The weeks before I felt more a sense of calm by doing the exercises. I feel like my triggers towards others are more and more felt. Last days I also started thinking a lot again about my ex-girlfriend, and I know it is all illusiory, but it seems that all the parts are at play here. The one that wants to be loved, the one that is loving, the one that is angry, that one that feels betrayed, etc. All of it coming together and the thoughts about her, and situations in the past just wont stop. They keep coming in different forms, and go together with strong uncomfortable sensations that I really don't like to feel (yesterday these stayed almost the whole day), is there anything I can do when this happens? I tried to allow it all, but it was so difficult. It is like a constant storm that wont stop. I know it will pass again, but still.
Do you think that an inherently independent self exists?
No, there are thoughts about Thomas (content), but there does not seem to be someone independent from everything else. Thoughts are saying that no Thomas exists.
Do you feel that an inherently independent self exists?
Well yes, there feels to be something/someone here, that is seperate from things out there. Someone that experiences shame when doing something awkward, someone that feels hurt when someone says something hurtfull.
Do you control events as they happen?
No, there is no control whatsoever. Everything arises spontaneously. No control of external events, and no control over internal events.
How important is intention?
What is intention and who is creating the intention? Intention for what, for the inquiry? I think that it is important to have the intention to fully allow what is happening in your experience and to intimitely be curious in who you are. However, I am not creating this intention, it just is there or not.
Is there an actual past or future?
No, that is all just thoughts. There is only this DE, and the overlay of thought content giving the idea that there is a past and a future.
How do you relate to your thoughts?
I don't particulary like my thoughts. I feel like I am addicted to thoughts. They tend to be very critical towards me. But also that is just a thought. I have defnitely tried to fight my thoughts for a long time, since starting this process with you I became more in acceptance mode, but past days I started to fight my thoughts again. Who is fighting the thoughts? There are thoughts and the content tends to be more negative than positive, but that interpretation is also a thought. Do I think I am my thoughts no, do they often occupie a space that makes it feel and seem like they are my life, yes.
How do you relate to your emotions?
I noticed that the past week I was less in touch with my emotions, because I saw them as sensations in the body with thought overlay. However today I cried again, for the first time in a long time in a couple of months and it gave some relief, from the tension I am feeling the last few days, and I saw again that emotions really do have a purpose and are very natural. Some I find more difficult to give space than others, like anger for me is a difficult one to embrace and express. Not many people have seen me angry. During the christmast days I became really aware of frustration towards some of my family members. It did not happen often, but when it did happen it was very strong and present, like I was going to explode (which I didn't).
Has your relationship to other people changed?
Yes and no, I can feel much more appreciation for others, and the conversations are a lot more real. Also I act less from trying to pretend to be someone, and stay closer to myself. However, I can still experience this distance with others and find it difficult to really let people come closer or more intimate to me. And although to a much lesser extent, I still feels this pressure to behave in a certain way when being around others.
How do you react when conflict/problems arise?
I tend to keep it for myself, be very conflict avoidant. I always feel like it is my first responsibility to be mindful around it, so see what in the conflict is happening from my interpretation. Often times it will lead to me eventually not mentioning it. However, when someone is really crossing my boundaries, I will definitely take actions against it. This just does not happen often. I try to no expect to much from others, tho thoughts still create this idea. I consider myself very considerate, so when others are not, it tend to trigger and frustrate me.
What is you relationship to life?
At times I have felt very attuned with life and the fact that I am alive. I also realize that it has always been dependent from moment to moment. There are moments in where you would have asked me I would have answered with: I feel grateful to be alive, to have an experience, to learn new skills, to meet people, to taste food. At times I can feel very in tune with the city I live in, with the people around me, and with nature. However, like mentioned the past few days there is this dissatisfaction, which kinda overshadows everything and make it appear like I am dissatisfied with life (which is often also the case). Dissatisfied with where I am in some aspects of life and dissatisfied that I still feel often seperate from the life around me. I realize how special it is to live, but I don't generally experience it like that.
Are there doubts? If so, please describe them.

There is a doubt about whether or not I will ever cut through the illusion of the self. Like I am actually capable of it.
There is a doubt about how much of my focus and energy I should put in this and neglect some other things in life, like I am already doing: not seeing friends, not going out there to date, not putting more energy in my career. However, I know that all those things will remain in someway unsatisfied when still experienced as a self.
If you are not the separate self, who/what are you?
The awareness of the senses? It is a big mistery, I don't know what I am.

Loving regards,
Thomas

User avatar
Noro
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:42 pm

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Noro » Sat Jan 04, 2025 6:00 pm

Hi Thomas,
The need to stay there I guess is the feeling that there is more to be realized from DE, but also to know that living in the content of thought is creating a lot of suffering.
Are you sure that a feeling would/could say that?
Developing a good use of language is so important for seeing clearly.
I guess there is actually this feeling, intuition, sense that there is something pure in DE.
Yes, this is actual experience, and then finding descriptive words to share or communicate that experience.

there is also a fear to loose the touch with DE and fall back into complete mind identification again. Like happened a little bit more the past days. There is just this urge to not be mind identified anymore,

LOOK here, who or what is fearful of losing touch with DE?
Who or what does not want to fall back into complete mind identification?
Is this not mind identification???

WE are looking for a 'someone'; a separate, independent and autonomous self that thinks it can have control over what is arising.

Yes, it is uncomfortable when we get swept up into the contracted state of mind identification, but this gives another perfect opportunity to notice this happening and to acknowledge that thinking is taking over. Once seen, attention can move towards feelings and sensations in the body and the other sense fields.
Since childhood, we have learned to give priority to thinking and to disregard the senses, this is a well entrenched habit pattern which will not change overnight.
Feelings of frustration etc. can arise, this is normal.
Acknowledge the label 'frustration'
Feel the sensations.
INQUIRE: Is there an "I" or ME that is frustrated?

"because although I realize I am not a someone, my experience still feels uncomfortable a majority of the time."
Is it true that you realize you are not a "someone"? It's not clear from the way you have expressed this that this is an actual understanding that you have gained through your inquiry.
If you are not a 'someone' or a separate self, then what are you? And what can own experience by adding the label "my?"
Please clarify:
When you say or think 'I', what do you refer to with the word 'I'?


So I can't say I could properly do this test with directions and signs,


Yes, if you are not habitually driving around in a care, this is not such an easy exercise to do, but you found an alternative version! :)
but generaly it appears that some form of thought is required to make sense of things and to find the meaning behind them. However, at the same time, I am typing right now, without thinking the words upfront. So something is making complete sentences and thereby making sense, without the need to actively think about it.
There is a point when it can be seen that the written word can be taken in effortlessly, but there is some kind of brain or neuronal activity going on that recognizes and cognizes. If it were a foreign language this would not happen.
Thought content can arise effortlessly in some situations, with or without identification. In other situations, say doing a crossword puzzle or playing scrabble it might seem that there is some kind of efforting or searching going on.
Don't we need the content for thoughts at all?
Conventionally, there might be thoughts about a 'someone' needing to know more in order to understand etc.
But LOOK: who or what could need content of thoughts, and for what purpose?
It takes very little to get diverted away from the senses and into thought content!

I don't think you need to register the meaning of the words actively, but it seems to be happening all by itself. There is no one to actively register the meaning.
YES!!!

But doing activities completely in DE seems difficult.
Think of DE as part of a spectrum of experiencing. Think of a dimmer switch. At one end, i.e. with DE, all labels are dropped, there is just the simple experiencing through the sense fields. At the other end of the spectrum, attention is fully taken up with thought content. Awareness of the present moment forgotten as thinking/memories/imagination etc. Follow this movement, back and forth without holding on to the thought that one end of the spectrum is more desirable than the other.

All of it coming together and the thoughts about her, and situations in the past just wont stop. They keep coming in different forms, and go together with strong uncomfortable sensations that I really don't like to feel (yesterday these stayed almost the whole day), is there anything I can do when this happens? I tried to allow it all, but it was so difficult. It is like a constant storm that wont stop. I know it will pass again, but still.
This does sound very intense Thomas, and you are meeting all this intensity very courageously. Delving into this is more in the domaine of shadow-work and exploring early childhood trauma patterns. It is not really part of this LU enquiry.
You are asking whether there is anything 'you' can do when this happens? My suggestion:
Can you remain in the body with all these sensations passing through?
If there is a body response of "YES" then there will be a relaxing of the body in agreement with the "YES"
"Yes, I can be in the body with all these sensations moving around."

If there is a body response of "NO" then respect the response that there is strong resistance to feeling the body sensations.
Allow for that resistance to have the right to be there and give it a voice!
"No! I absolutely cannot be in the body with all these sensations moving around!"
The "I" here is voicing the body response which does not need to be identified with as a 'separate self'.
Try that and see what happens.

I don't particulary like my thoughts. I feel like I am addicted to thoughts. They tend to be very critical towards me. But also that is just a thought. I have defnitely tried to fight my thoughts for a long time, since starting this process with you I became more in acceptance mode, but past days I started to fight my thoughts again. Who is fighting the thoughts? There are thoughts and the content tends to be more negative than positive, but that interpretation is also a thought.
I so get what you are sharing here..... I too have had a very strong inner critic and that harsh inner voice can be very uncomfortable. Since we are not investigating IFS or other trauma or Shadow work here, inquiry always returns to LOOKING at whether this is happening to an "I" or a ME.
Do I think I am my thoughts no,
This is not a response from Direct Looking.
Do you remember this exercise?

COLORED SOCKS
If I ask you what color socks you are wearing right now you have two ways to answer:
1. You can think about it, trying to remember, or guessing what colour they are.
2. You can have a look at your socks and see what colour they ACTUALLY are!
You will agree that only by looking you could be 100% certain, right?

do they often occupie a space that makes it feel and seem like they are my life, yes.
Yes, it can feel and seem like that. But feeling/seeming is not a fact and is pointing you back to LOOK again.

Where is this 'ME'?
To whom or what does "My life" belong?
Does this "My life" suggest that life should be other than it is?
Is there a separate thinker of such a thought?
Can that thought be allowed to be voiced?



COLORED SOCKS
If I ask you what color socks you are wearing right now you have two ways to answer:
1. You can think about it, trying to remember, or guessing what colour they are.
2. You can have a look at your socks and see what colour they ACTUALLY are!
You will agree that only by looking you could be 100% certain, right?

There is a doubt about whether or not I will ever cut through the illusion of the self. Like I am actually capable of it.
Doubt is natural. There is the illusion of a separate "I" that has been assumed to exist and yet it cannot be found and even so, out of habit, identification with thoughts and beliefs continue. Mental fixations continue, like the inner critic.

Please look again for this the thought content above: Is there an independent "I" that is thinking these thoughts?
Keep LOOKING, it is only through looking and seeing that the doubt will be seen for what it is.... more thinking.
And doubt also points to feelings of resistance in the body.
Can an actual 'doubter' be found?
There is a doubt about how much of my focus and energy I should put in this and neglect some other things in life, like I am already doing: not seeing friends, not going out there to date, not putting more energy in my career.
I can see that there is a lot of resistance going on to what's happening.
Thoughts about how things "should" be.
Thoughts about neglect of some other things in life.
However, I know that all those things will remain in someway unsatisfied when still experienced as a self.
How do you know this?
Is this your direct experience or is it some figment of imagination based on expectations?

Expectations are a hindrance. They cling to an idea of how it is supposed to go, which is not necessarily correct. When realization happens, it can be very subtle and if there are expectations of any kind, then it can be missed and the guiding becomes very difficult. I can promise you there will be no fireworks; it is just a subtle shift in perception! The only true expectation, that you can have, is that the seeking will end. If there are any other expectations, it's good to acknowledge them and then set them aside. It is all much simpler and ordinary. Is that OK with you?


Lets look at this again:

What comes up when reading there is no separate "self," never has been and never will be? It is all a made-up story?

Don't go to thought,
Go to the senses.
Let me know



With love,

Rowena
"Experience is an incredible explosion of energy appearing in inconceivable, infinite consciousness." Peter Brown, from Yoga of Radiant Presence,

User avatar
Secrethippie
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:38 am

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Secrethippie » Sun Jan 05, 2025 8:26 am

Hi Rowena,

Feeling more capable today to react from DE. It was so intens the past days, but I realize it always passes and also just investigating the contraction is all that has to be done, but somehow I got swept away by fear and mind identification. Doesnt matter now, happens all by itself, lets start again.
Are you sure that a feeling would/could say that?
Only thoughts can say that. The feeling in DE just feels more expansive, direct and intimate than the feeling in thought content. It is as if everything gets amplified and slows down a bit, all appearing in a spaciousness. The body sensations, the thoughts, the sounds outside and inside, the wide visual experience.
LOOK here, who or what is fearful of losing touch with DE?
Only thoughts are fearful of losing touch with DE, it is just another thought, another persona. And you can always come back to DE, it is always here.
Who or what does not want to fall back into complete mind identification?
Is this not mind identification???
Yes this is just mind identification in the form of a spiritual seeker/critic. Its all thoughts that dont want to be identified with themselves.
Acknowledge the label 'frustration'
Feel the sensations.
INQUIRE: Is there an "I" or ME that is frustrated?
No there is just frustration in the form of the label and the sensations associated with it. All I can find about a me or I is a thought. When a thought says yes, I ask, "okay, but where is it then"? and everytime this results in nothing to be found. There is no one here.
Is it true that you realize you are not a "someone"? It's not clear from the way you have expressed this that this is an actual understanding that you have gained through your inquiry.
If you are not a 'someone' or a separate self, then what are you? And what can own experience by adding the label "my?"
Sitting with the question, "what am I"? Sensing in the forehead, sensing in the chest, looking into the room, hearing the clock. But is there someone having this experience. Formations of senses on my face and an image of myself, but is this me? Thoughts about who I am, but is that me? All are already gone, so what is here now, what is left? Who or what am I? I can't find anything stable, anything that remains. Outside of thoughts I can't find a me.
When saying "my experience" the same thing happens, sensations in the forehead and chest, sensations moving throught the whole body, the image of the room, sensations in the throat, who is having the experience? Very strong sensations now in the body, still no experiencer found.
Please clarify:
When you say or think 'I', what do you refer to with the word 'I'?
No idea, clueless. there is a sad feeling, because there is something being overlooked. Is there an I a me? Where do I refer to with I? Thomas, the experiencer. But is there an experiencer? not where I look, not in DE.
But LOOK: who or what could need content of thoughts, and for what purpose?
The conventional Thomas, the persona needs the content of thoughts in interaction with others or to think about his conventional life. In DE there is no need for thought content. There is a need for thought to write this to you, but is that thought content? No it is just the writing down of the initial thoughts and words that come up in my mind.
It takes very little to get diverted away from the senses and into thought content!
Yes very little, it is so subtle
Think of DE as part of a spectrum of experiencing. Think of a dimmer switch. At one end, i.e. with DE, all labels are dropped, there is just the simple experiencing through the sense fields. At the other end of the spectrum, attention is fully taken up with thought content. Awareness of the present moment forgotten as thinking/memories/imagination etc. Follow this movement, back and forth without holding on to the thought that one end of the spectrum is more desirable than the other.
Wow interesting, the switch is clearly felt, but at some point it merges more into eachother into one seeming experience.
This does sound very intense Thomas, and you are meeting all this intensity very courageously. Delving into this is more in the domaine of shadow-work and exploring early childhood trauma patterns. It is not really part of this LU enquiry.
You are asking whether there is anything 'you' can do when this happens? My suggestion:
Can you remain in the body with all these sensations passing through?
If there is a body response of "YES" then there will be a relaxing of the body in agreement with the "YES"
"Yes, I can be in the body with all these sensations moving around."

If there is a body response of "NO" then respect the response that there is strong resistance to feeling the body sensations.
Allow for that resistance to have the right to be there and give it a voice!
"No! I absolutely cannot be in the body with all these sensations moving around!"
The "I" here is voicing the body response which does not need to be identified with as a 'separate self'.
Try that and see what happens.
Will do this next time the storm arrives, thanks!. Today I am much more okay with feeling everything, so now my body is saying YES, of course with some habitual resistance still there.
This is not a response from Direct Looking.
Do you remember this exercise?

COLORED SOCKS
If I ask you what color socks you are wearing right now you have two ways to answer:
1. You can think about it, trying to remember, or guessing what colour they are.
2. You can have a look at your socks and see what colour they ACTUALLY are!
You will agree that only by looking you could be 100% certain, right?
Yes only by looking you can be 100% certain! The thoughts are observed, so they can't be me. They are part of what is being known. You can be certain about the color when you look at the sock, but how can I be certain there no self if I can't find anything when I look? Where else can I look?
Where is this 'ME'?
I am here, very close and intimate, yet nowhere to be found.
To whom or what does "My life" belong?
This life is just happening, it does not belong to anyone. What is my life even? That is only a thought. There is just this moment.
Does this "My life" suggest that life should be other than it is?
Identification with "my life" does, but in DE No, it really is just as it is. There is no way life could be otherwise now. Thoughts might say it should be different, but in DE it is clear that this is it. No other life, no other way than this being it. All happening by itself.
Is there a separate thinker of such a thought?
There are just the thoughts and the awareness of them, but a seperate thinker? No. No one who seems to be consciously creating thoughts. The only thing that can be a seperate thinker is a thought.
Can that thought be allowed to be voiced?
Yes it is okay for the thought of improving My life to be there. Forcing it to not be there will also be a thought, so that won't make any difference. It makes sense that parts of me want to have a different life, they want the best for me. But these thoughts are not of use to me in this process, so I will allow them to be there, but at the same time look for the "my" it is referring to and stay with the DE.
Please look again for this the thought content above: Is there an independent "I" that is thinking these thoughts?
Keep LOOKING, it is only through looking and seeing that the doubt will be seen for what it is.... more thinking.
And doubt also points to feelings of resistance in the body.
Can an actual 'doubter' be found?
No they are just thoughts these doubts. Is someone having these doubts? More thoughts about a me. There is doubt in the form of resistance. But also this resistance is hard to find. There are just the sensations, a contraction of sensations in forehead and chest that are associated with a me, and doubtful thoughts, but is there a doubter? I am getting stuck here. I don't know where to look. Where am I actually looking from? Resulted in pain in the forehead.
How do you know this?
Is this your direct experience or is it some figment of imagination based on expectations?
This is indeed not DE, but more a projection in the future, based on a manipulated interpretation of the past. There is no way to know it. But it is what is keeping me on this path, the dissatisfaction with living in the illusion of being an I.
Expectations are a hindrance. They cling to an idea of how it is supposed to go, which is not necessarily correct. When realization happens, it can be very subtle and if there are expectations of any kind, then it can be missed and the guiding becomes very difficult. I can promise you there will be no fireworks; it is just a subtle shift in perception! The only true expectation, that you can have, is that the seeking will end. If there are any other expectations, it's good to acknowledge them and then set them aside. It is all much simpler and ordinary. Is that OK with you?
Yes that is completely fine by me, I will try to let go of any expectations and just remain in the inquiry of the self and DE.

Lets look at this again:
What comes up when reading there is no separate "self," never has been and never will be? It is all a made-up story?
Strong pull into the senses, senses everywhere in experience. No Self to be found. Many thoughts and stories about a me coming up. I will stay with this investigation as much as I can.

Thank you for your patience!

Loving regards,
Thomas

User avatar
Noro
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:42 pm

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Noro » Sun Jan 05, 2025 1:58 pm

Hi Thomas,

I am happy to hear that you weathered the emotional storm..... there's nothing like the holiday season to set off a few triggers! And then a wonderful opportunity to actually look and see what is happening. Well done!
When saying "my experience" the same thing happens, sensations in the forehead and chest, sensations moving throught the whole body, the image of the room, sensations in the throat, who is having the experience? Very strong sensations now in the body, still no experiencer found.
Yes, the sensations can be very intense. You are venturing deeper into sensations that have, until now, had you diverting into thinking and or doing. Anything to keep away from feeling.
Yes very little, it is so subtle
Like a razor's edge!

Will do this next time the storm arrives, thanks!. Today I am much more okay with feeling everything, so now my body is saying YES, of course with some habitual resistance still there.
It can help to think in terms of layers. For instance:
When there is resistance this is often an outer protective layer to avoid venturing deeper.
So long as the resistance is acknowledged (and allowed a little 'rant' if it needed), ie: "No I do not want to let go!"
It will often dissolve so that inquiry can be taken deeper.
But intentionally trying to remove resistance through effort will only strengthen.

but how can I be certain there no self if I can't find anything when I look? Where else can I look?
AH BINGO! This is the biggest catch! Look at what the illusory self habit pattern has just thought up! It is looking to find proof or certainty that it doesn't exist. It has thought itself into existence, spinning a web of mental overlay on everything that is happening effortlessly.

LOOK for that "I" that wants proof! In which sense field can it be found?
LOOK at what is right here, now, in front of you:
What is here, without thought overlay?
What are 'you' without all personal labels and 'life-story' ?
Where are 'you' without all that thought content?
What is it that needs proof?


Please LOOK carefully and sincerely here. It is so easy for thinking to take over and answer by rote, as if it was reciting a multiplication table.

Thoughts might say it should be different, but in DE it is clear that this is it. No other life, no other way than this being it. All happening by itself.
Yes, thoughts will continue to say thing's should be different, and sometimes this can easily be seen as thought content, at other times there might be more of an early wounding pattern or fixation that still needs to be looked at and the '"I" ME narrative will become active again.

I am getting stuck here. I don't know where to look. Where am I actually looking from? Resulted in pain in the forehead.
Don't try and force inquiry when there is stuckness happening....back off a little, take a break.
Who/What is getting stuck?

Strong pull into the senses, senses everywhere in experience. No Self to be found. Many thoughts and stories about a me coming up. I will stay with this investigation as much as I can.
FEAR is the body holding onto the world. The body becomes afraid because it thinks that what it knows or thinks it knows, or is familiar with is its security, and that is the only way it can feel safe in the world.

This video might be helpful:
Looking at Fear - meditation
https://youtu.be/jKX1llYtlKE?si=Hj2f27P4aXCk9hKY


MEMORY EXERCISE
Almost everybody believes that a memory thought is referring to something that has happened. That a memory thought is a different thought than a non-memory thought.

Please don’t go into thought analysis or explanations, but just let a memory be there, and look at it.

Look at what is actually going on and not what thoughts say - but what actually is.

What is memory exactly?

What is the memory ‘made of’?

WHEN does the memory appear?

What is the exact difference between a ‘general’ thought and a ‘memory’ thought?

How is it known EXACTLY that a ‘memory’ thought refers to something that has happened?

Then, look at a thought about the future.

What is the future thought ‘made of’?

WHEN does the future thought appear?

What is the exact difference between a ‘general’ thought and a ‘future’ thought?

How is it known EXACTLY that a ‘future’ thought refers to something that will happen?

Then let’s compare a thought about past and a thought about the future.

What is the EXACT difference between the thoughts about past and future?

If there is difference, how is that difference is known exactly?



With love,

Rowena
"Experience is an incredible explosion of energy appearing in inconceivable, infinite consciousness." Peter Brown, from Yoga of Radiant Presence,

User avatar
Secrethippie
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:38 am

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Secrethippie » Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:29 am

Hi Rowena,
It can help to think in terms of layers. For instance:
When there is resistance this is often an outer protective layer to avoid venturing deeper.
So long as the resistance is acknowledged (and allowed a little 'rant' if it needed), ie: "No I do not want to let go!"
It will often dissolve so that inquiry can be taken deeper.
But intentionally trying to remove resistance through effort will only strengthen.
Hmm good one. It is constantly this paradox between looking (effort), and just allowing. But yeah certainly with resistance, or painful emotions, the more you fight them the more they take space. So I will invite them with open arms. "you are welcome and can leave whenever you feel like it"
LOOK for that "I" that wants proof! In which sense field can it be found?
When looking there is are senses at the forehead, chest, tickling sensations on arms and legs. Feeling the whole face and chest area feeling even narrower. Feels like body is contracting everywhere. Hearing the sound of the computer. Where is the one that wants proof? Hmm, no answer arrives. Nothing conceptual, nothing in the senses. Then why is there looking if there is nothing to find? Thoughts trying to capture attention, but the sensory field is very strong now, cant be missed. Than who is looking? Is the whole looking also made up? Just a thought? Than what is happening right now? Again feeling the senses. Hearing sounds. Noticing a certain calmness, despite the contractions. Again thoughts trying to take over, but being brought back to the senses. Who is looking? No one answers. Thoughts trying to bring me back to a conceptual answer on this search, but the answer can't be found in thoughts. The sensations are the doorway, because they show there is something else than just thoughts. Many tactics used to draw me away from them, to not look. Not settling for an answer, staying alert and close to the senses. Where am I? The I that wants proof is a thought. Nothing else is seeking. The senses are not seeking.
LOOK at what is right here, now, in front of you:
What is here, without thought overlay?
Only answers in thought. There are the senses. Than thoughts. Is there someone witnissing this process? There is a lot of alertness now, everything is being noticed, not just content of thought. There is a lot happening in experience. But am I seperate from experience? Everything that I experience here is also just senses. A thought saying they are closer than the sounds outside. All thoughts. What is here? Sadness coming up, there is sadness today. Looking and not finding, looking and not finding. Sounds happening and going again. Feelings in the body, constantly changing. What is here without thought overlay? Just the raw experiencing. Constantly questioning the conceptual answers that come. Thoughts trying to do everything to convince that there is something here. Something with memories, feelings with a body. But where is it? haha.
What are 'you' without all personal labels and 'life-story' ?
Staying long with each of these questions. There is just the constant experiencing. I don't know what I am, there is nothing particular to find.
Where are 'you' without all that thought content?
Nowhere. Here does not make sense and everywhere doenst as well. In DE there is no here or there.
What is it that needs proof?
Only a thought needs proof
Who/What is getting stuck?
Again, thoughts are getting stuck. Making themselves getting stuck and finding a solution to get out of it. It is all just thoughts. It is a thought telling me I am not there yet. A thought saying there is something to find. A thought saying that now I understand it. Thought after thought after thought hahahah. When attention moves away from thoughts, there is no stuckness, because there is nothing to look for. Only the self, formed by this web of thoughts is searching and therefore getting stuck on the search. Yet it is not about fighting the thoughts, because that can only be done by more thoughts. Just staying present with the senses. A thought now saying, there is nothing to find aha. Still a thought... getting back to the senses. Looking outside. Feeling presence. Who am I? It is a mysterie.
This video might be helpful:
Looking at Fear - meditation
https://youtu.be/jKX1llYtlKE?si=Hj2f27P4aXCk9hKY
Wow, beautiful approach. Fear is welcome and is here to protect my younger self from when I got hurth. It does not need to go, but it can relax a bit more when I give it the attention it deserves. I will do this one again tonight.

MEMORY EXERCISE
Almost everybody believes that a memory thought is referring to something that has happened. That a memory thought is a different thought than a non-memory thought.

Please don’t go into thought analysis or explanations, but just let a memory be there, and look at it.

Look at what is actually going on and not what thoughts say - but what actually is.
What is memory exactly?
Just a thought, combined with a sensory feeling (emotion).
What is the memory ‘made of’?
An internal movie, with internal sounds, and an emotion attached to the movie. Thoughts labeling on that experience.
WHEN does the memory appear?
Just randomly, but it only appears now. The thought of having thought about a memory is another thought in the present.
What is the exact difference between a ‘general’ thought and a ‘memory’ thought?
Nothing, just the content is different. But a thought is a thought, nothing more than that.
How is it known EXACTLY that a ‘memory’ thought refers to something that has happened?
Only with another thought. When a memory thought is seen for a thought, it is just that together with a sensory experience, that might be familiarized again by a thought.
Then, look at a thought about the future.
What is the future thought ‘made of’?
Same thing, an internal movie, sounds, and sensations in the body, and than thoughts about this experience.
WHEN does the future thought appear?
Randomly and right here, right now.
What is the exact difference between a ‘general’ thought and a ‘future’ thought?
Nothing, only the content of the thought is different
How is it known EXACTLY that a ‘future’ thought refers to something that will happen?
Only by more thoughts. In DE there is just the thinking, the thoughts arising. No difference between the thoughts. Different thoughts are acompanied by different sensations, but again without focusing on the content, there are just the thoughts, and there are just the sensations.
Then let’s compare a thought about past and a thought about the future.
What is the EXACT difference between the thoughts about past and future?
Only thought content, no other differences
If there is difference, how is that difference is known exactly?
Only thought can create this difference. There is no difference in the pure experience of the thought, which is just the image, the internal sound and from there a movement of attention to the sensing.

I am feeling some sadness arising these days, with occasional crying. Feeling a certain love for myself, your help, the process and life. But also the sadness of a being that wants to be seen and heard and finally wants to feel fine with itself. I think it shows me that I can approach this process with more love and compassion. Not more self criticism.

With love,
Thomas

User avatar
Noro
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:42 pm

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Noro » Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:39 am

Hi Thomas,

It is my pleasure to be guiding you, and I really enjoyed reading your last post.
The inquiry process was very precise, and the language describing your experiencing was clear and beautiful to read! Keep writing! <3

I am feeling some sadness arising these days, with occasional crying. Feeling a certain love for myself, your help, the process and life. But also the sadness of a being that wants to be seen and heard and finally wants to feel fine with itself. I think it shows me that I can approach this process with more love and compassion. Not more self criticism.
Oh yes! What a beautiful process. And when self-criticism arises, can there be love and compassion for that too!

And an opportunity to LOOK again:
Is there an "I" that can approach this process with more love and compassion?
Is there an "I" that can call up love and compassion on demand?
Is there an "I" that can choose, decide, or intend to do anything?
How does it work?
Where is love and compassion to be found?


Here is another video by Ilona Ciunaite:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJQcD588g2w


And I like this poem:
POEM: I walked down the street, Portia Nelson
https://www.mindfulnesstherapy.co.uk/wp ... nelson.pdf


Take a look at these questions again; are there still hopes or fears?
Without getting too wordy, feel in to any lingering thoughts/beliefs/expectations that might be active to the questions and let them be voiced.

1. What will be different when you realize there’s no separate self?

2. What do you expect to happen as a result of this?

3. What do you want not to happen?

4. What are you hoping for?

5. What is missing?



With love,

Rowena
"Experience is an incredible explosion of energy appearing in inconceivable, infinite consciousness." Peter Brown, from Yoga of Radiant Presence,

User avatar
Noro
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:42 pm

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Noro » Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:41 am

I forgot to use color for these, so just in case:

And an opportunity to LOOK again:
Is there an "I" that can approach this process with more love and compassion?
Is there an "I" that can call up love and compassion on demand?
Is there an "I" that can choose, decide, or intend to do anything?
How does it work?
Where is love and compassion to be found?
"Experience is an incredible explosion of energy appearing in inconceivable, infinite consciousness." Peter Brown, from Yoga of Radiant Presence,

User avatar
Secrethippie
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:38 am

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Secrethippie » Tue Jan 07, 2025 6:27 pm

Hi Rowena,

And an opportunity to LOOK again:
Is there an "I" that can approach this process with more love and compassion?
Again tuning in the senses. That strong feeling in the chest. The wind outside. The typing. The breath is going by itself. The senses are active all over the body. Thoughts coming and going. Is there an I that can apply love and compassion? There is this feeling in the belly, that is connected to love and compassion. But is there an I applying it? Again just the wind and the senses answer. Feeling in my throat. The I that can apply love and compassion is also a thought. Love and compassion arive by themselves.

Sensations in the forehead. Feeling tiredness, wich is sensing+label. Future thoughts coming about today, which is just thought content. Is there an I in this process. Answer thought yes. Than where is it? Feeling in the belly. Where is this I? Nothing to find.
Is there an "I" that can call up love and compassion on demand?
There are thoughts that claim they can. But is there an "I" that can do this on demand? Is anything happening on demand? The sounds outside dont. The typing of these letters dont. My next thought does not. Sensations in the body come however they like. Keep investigating and searching for an I. Someone that pulls the strings. Thoughts taking away my attention. Who's attention? Strong contraction in the forehead. Appears "I" am looking from the eyes. Yet attention moves to the belly. Feeling pain in the forehead, so taking a little break.
Is there an "I" that can choose, decide, or intend to do anything?
Not looking for an answer in thought, but still looking. Thoughts saying yes, but where is it? Where is this me? No Answer. Again, who is investigating and asking these questions? They come by themselves? Looking in the room, one image, labeling happening on objects. Is there someone looking, or is there just the seen? Again, who is asking the question? The question is just a thought. A thought saying there is no one choosing is also a thought. There is just nothing to find, but also no looking? No looker? There are sounds, there are sensations, there is taste, there are letters appearing, but someone looking? There is the visual image and the thought about a looker. Thought always connects itself to another sense, making it appear like it is me doing it.
How does it work?
There are no choices made at all. Just the happening of one thing after another. Attention goes wherever it goes and that determines what is experienced. Thoughts try to bind it together and create the idea that there is someone making decisions.
Where is love and compassion to be found?
Just a sensory experience with a thought putting a label on it. In DE love and compassion are not different than the other senses (or emotions).
Here is another video by Ilona Ciunaite:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJQcD588g2w
Nice, resting in being is what I am trying to do as much as I can and letting the process unfold by itself. And I also recognize that today the thought content came more to the foreground again, also because there was a lot of tiredness because I could not sleep. No control over it. So lets see if DE comes back again more to the foreground.
POEM: I walked down the street, Portia Nelson
https://www.mindfulnesstherapy.co.uk/wp ... nelson.pdf
Beautiful
1. What will be different when you realize there’s no separate self?
More in pure DE experience and less in made up stories. That is the difference.
2. What do you expect to happen as a result of this?
Attuned to the environment and therefore experiencing the oneness.
More resting in being and therefore at ease.
3. What do you want not to happen?
Thoughts (in form of an ego?) still want to remain (so they don't want to loose their grip), but that is the only thing that wants something. That likes or dislikes. Without focussing on the thoughts, there is no need to favor one thing over the other. When listening to the thoughts, if that is this exercise, they still dont want to loose (want to say my job, but that feels strange) the current job.
4. What are you hoping for?
Non identification with thoughts about the future and the past. Fully experiencing each and every moment, without needing to be somewhere else (thoughts). Being present with whatever is arising.
5. What is missing?
Again in DE not much is missing, but when raising this question the following words come up: Love, calmness, clarity, stability

Something feels different yesterday and today, but I can't quite point it. There is more attunement with the senses, and less identification with thoughts, maybe that is it. Im standing in front of groups these days at the university, so the self referential thoughts come up a lot, but they seem to be more easily recognized thoughts.

Loving regards,
Thomas

User avatar
Noro
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:42 pm

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Noro » Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:39 pm

Hi Thomas,
The I that can apply love and compassion is also a thought. Love and compassion arive by themselves.
Lovely :)


Is there an "I" that can choose, decide, or intend to do anything?
Not looking for an answer in thought, but still looking. Thoughts saying yes, but where is it? Where is this me? No Answer. Again, who is investigating and asking these questions? They come by themselves? Looking in the room, one image, labeling happening on objects. Is there someone looking, or is there just the seen? Again, who is asking the question? The question is just a thought. A thought saying there is no one choosing is also a thought. There is just nothing to find, but also no looking? No looker? There are sounds, there are sensations, there is taste, there are letters appearing, but someone looking? There is the visual image and the thought about a looker. Thought always connects itself to another sense, making it appear like it is me doing it.
Keep on looking here.
How does it feel in the body when you can't find anything (chooser, decider etc.)?
Stay with the feelings, watch them move and then LOOK again.


Nice, resting in being is what I am trying to do as much as I can and letting the process unfold by itself. And I also recognize that today the thought content came more to the foreground again, also because there was a lot of tiredness because I could not sleep. No control over it. So let's see if DE comes back again more to the foreground.
Who or what is trying.... or is this just a bit of identification with a thought!

Tiredness does muddy the waters, and as you said, there's not control over it. Just a continual play between resting in being and being diverted by thoughts. Like the clouds in the sky that obscure the sun, sometimes covering over for days, and then blue sky returns. Thoughts are much the same!


Regarding the expectations; you answered them straightforwardly in conventional manner, but (please forgive me) the first one especially was kind of sneaky and misleading, and it shows how easily thoughts seem to follow the track of the question! We have looked at thoughts relating to memory/future! It is so easy for thoughts to get diverted. Your answers are totally reasonable, but for the purposes of continuing our inquiry I think it would be good for you to LOOK again. Look into all thoughts wanting things to be different generally. This is a default thinking pattern that we all have that takes us away from our actual experience of what is present here and now.

1. What will be different when you realize there’s no separate self?
More in pure DE experience and less in made up stories. That is the difference.
Is there a "you" that is still wanting to realize that there's no separate self?
Who or what are "you" without that thought?
Without that thought can anything be different?



2. What do you expect to happen as a result of this?
Attuned to the environment and therefore experiencing the oneness.
More resting in being and therefore at ease.
I think you confirmed this in your last paragraph! :)


3. What do you want not to happen?
Thoughts (in form of an ego?) still want to remain (so they don't want to loose their grip), but that is the only thing that wants something. That likes or dislikes. Without focussing on the thoughts, there is no need to favor one thing over the other. When listening to the thoughts, if that is this exercise, they still dont want to loose (want to say my job, but that feels strange) the current job.
It's perfectly natural that there are thoughts that are still trying to maintain a grip by causing diversion away from DE.


4. What are you hoping for?
Non identification with thoughts about the future and the past. Fully experiencing each and every moment, without needing to be somewhere else (thoughts). Being present with whatever is arising.
The more you notice when you get caught up in thought content, the easier it becomes to let them pass without becoming identified with them. If identification happens, no worries, it's simply time to do some more inquiry. This is a process of unbinding conditioned patterns, it takes time.

5. What is missing?
Again in DE not much is missing, but when raising this question the following words come up: Love, calmness, clarity, stability
And when you let go those thoughts (words or concepts) what is actually missing?
Something feels different yesterday and today, but I can't quite point it. There is more attunement with the senses, and less identification with thoughts, maybe that is it. Im standing in front of groups these days at the university, so the self referential thoughts come up a lot, but they seem to be more easily recognized thoughts.
Don't worry about pointing it, relax into it and enjoy!


NATURE EXERCISE

Go out into nature and spend some time watching the movement of the whole. See how clouds move, trees swing, leaves wiggle (or maybe not since it is winter!), grass moves, insects, birds - all move all the time.

Then move focus to sensations and see how they too are in constant motion, thoughts come and go, sounds, colours, sensations come and go.

Notice that everything is part of one movement.

Then close your eyes and see if there is a line between you and out there, between you and life itself. If yes, where is the boundary?

Is there an inside and an outside of Life?

Is there something which is not included in the movement of the whole?

Is there a witness that is watching life happening from a distance?

Is witnessing part of the one movement, too?

Is there anything which is not just happening?

Go out, come back and tell me what you found.



With love,

Rowena
"Experience is an incredible explosion of energy appearing in inconceivable, infinite consciousness." Peter Brown, from Yoga of Radiant Presence,

User avatar
Secrethippie
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:38 am

Re: Recognizing my non-dual nature

Postby Secrethippie » Sat Jan 11, 2025 12:36 pm

Hi Rowena,

A bit of a later response, It was a very busy week, my brother was visiting and I had to find a moment to go outside when it was not heavily raining.
Is there an "I" that can choose, decide, or intend to do anything?
Standing in front of groups past 2 days and almost no sleep past days increased illusion of self. But that is now a past thought. What is here now. The typing. Coldness on feet. Window open, so thought about it being the wind. Sounds outside from cars (thought). Feeling pains in the body and soarness (feeling+label). Is there a me in all of this? A me creating these words. Or is everyting arising by itself? Without a center? Where would this center be. In the sensations in the head. But who observes those? Shift to sensations in the throat and chest. More sounds outside (outside is thought). Sensations everywhere. Tiredness (thought). No center to be found. Just this openness where everything is happening. Also thoughts about me and the feeling of me are happening in this space. Thoughts trying to make sense, but trying to bring attention back to senses. Am I trying to do that? Who is trying? Me. Where is this me? Here. Where is that exactly? No looking at conceptual answers now. Looking for proof in experience. Who is looking for proof? There seems to be just looking as a thought. Then, is there an I that can choose, decide or intend to do anything? Thoughts ariving, formations of sensations. But is there a decision maker? Experience is a bit cloudy now.
How does it feel in the body when you can't find anything (chooser, decider etc.)?
Stay with the feelings, watch them move and then LOOK again.
It feels alive, like all the senses in the body become more subtle.
Then when I look again from this strong bodily awareness, the sensations itensify very stronly all of a sudden with a strong contraction in the center. The chest area feels a bit narrower and I also feel it strongly in the lower belly. Then attention went to the gut feeling, which feels connected to some kind of fear. Strong awareness now in the body.
Who or what is trying.... or is this just a bit of identification with a thought!
Yes this is identification with thought. There is no trying. There is what is happening and than thought overlay claiming that a someone is trying. But who is trying? There will only be conceptual answers on that. Starting to realize more and more that there is no one with control. But who is understanding that? haha. Just tuning into the senses. Hearing the sounds of the birds outside and seeing the typing. Than that feeling again in the chest and belly. There is not control. No controller.
1. What will be different when you realize there’s no separate self?
Is there a "you" that is still wanting to realize that there's no separate self?

Yes that is still a me in thought. The habit of thinking and identification with it that wants to realize no seperate self. It is another thought. Only a thought can create the idea of me, and it can also create the idea of a me realizing there is not me. Now, where am I in this web of thoughts. Am I the sensations in the body? But they are observed by something. Than what is observing? Who wants to find a me? A something that is observing? There are sounds, sensations, thoughts, sights, tastes.
Who or what are "you" without that thought?
Just looking and looking. Who am I? There is nothing to find.
Without that thought can anything be different?
Than there is no me perceiving anything, so also not liking or disliking anything. There are thoughts doing so, but without the thoughts of a seperate me, there is just this experience. The senses happening in different forms. Without a thought nothing can be different, because only thoughts can compare. Pure experience doesnt compare, it just is the way it is in the moment. So this moment is perfect as it is. Any thoughts about a better state of being are just that, thoughts and they are the only thing obscuring this desired state. But even a state is something that can only be found in thought, because it is temporary and time also only exist in thought. Yet it feels like there should be something more. Or is this another thought. There is maybe still a feeling of dissatisfaction. But where is this? In the belly there is a strong gut feeling that does not feel super comfortable. But only thoughts want something else. There is just this pure sensing, hearing, looking, and all the thoughts overlaying everything. Than yet, what more is there to realize? Or are thoughts just trying to realize something?
2. What do you expect to happen as a result of this?
Expectation is future thought, so can't really say much about it.
And when you let go those thoughts (words or concepts) what is actually missing?
Everything is just the way it is. Just thoughts wanting something different and using the senses to give the wishing and wanting more strenght. However, without thought there is no thing missing, because there does not seem to be something anywhere.
Then close your eyes and see if there is a line between you and out there, between you and life itself. If yes, where is the boundary?
Difficult to find nature in my city, but I found a quite spot in the park haha. It is a beautiful sunny day, for the first time in a long time, and nature really came alive, so it was perfect. The only boundary that can be found is in thought, either in a visualization of this boundary or in the form of a logical sentence. But outside thought no outside or inside appears to exist.
Is there an inside and an outside of Life?
Again, only thoughts can make this division. Other than there there are just the immediate senses in contstant movement.
Is there something which is not included in the movement of the whole?
Everything is in constant movement. The sensory experiences, attention, thoughts, animals, humans. Whatever I am is part of that constant movement.
Is there a witness that is watching life happening from a distance?
Again only thought can create this distance. Even with eyes closed there is the seeing and than thoughts labeling, closeby, far away, animal, human etc. Without the content of the thoughts there is just this immediacy of everything appearing. There is the feeling of a witness, which is a contracted sensory experience combined with a thought that that is me, but when seen for a thought, it appears to be more of an expansive space where everything is arising.
Is witnessing part of the one movement, too?
hmmm, well, although I could not find a witnesser, there seems to be a constant witnessing happening. This wisnessing seems to be always there, although the attention and so what is being witnessed is constantly changing. However the witnessing in itself does not seem to have any inherent quality other than it is just noticing and being aware. But it is constantly there throughout experience, even when the experiences within it are constantly changing. However, everything is in coexistance with this witnessing. Remembering the sock experiment, it is the only thing that you can be sure of. It is also happening when caught up in thought, only then the purity of it seems to be obscured. It brings everything it shines light on into existence. But it does not seem to exist on itself. It is nothing seperate either. It is here while typing, while thinking, while tasting my coffee, while looking at the screen, while feeling sensations in the back, not seperate from anything.
Is there anything which is not just happening?
nope, everything is really just happening. Nothing is excluded from that.

Loving regards,
Thomas


Return to “ARCHIVES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests