Hi Edward
Sorry about my slow reply. I went away for a long weekend with some friends, and there was very little opportunity to get online.
I see that Finloh and Vivi have asked you a couple of questions, so I won't bombard you with any more until you've answered theirs. I'll just try to explain what we're trying to do here, and where we're going with this process.
We're trying to help you to discover that what you think of as subjectivity is
deeply profound in nature. The experience of the colour red is not the same as the word red. The experience of love is not the same as the word love. And every single experience is accompanied by a stream of words and "thought commentary".
This thought commentary creates a sort of "veil of ideas" over direct experience, and at the same time tells a story that all experiences are 'centred' in a location. Thought tells a story of a 'mind'. There is no such thing as 'mind' and there is no such thing as "subconscious", even cognitive scientists will admit that 'mind' and 'subconscious' are nothing but concepts. Thought even tells stories about subjectivity, and gives it a "location", but thoughts CAN NOT BE TRUSTED.
These thoughts that create the "veil", and that tell a story about an "I" are NOT your thoughts. They only say that they are yours. We will go through the exercise of testing whether you're the thinker of thoughts, but for now you have to trust us, and do your very best to report ONLY direct experience, with as little thought story as possible.
I explained what I mean in my first post on your thread.
Here is an example from your reply to me:
Can you describe this "feeling that there is a me"? What does it feel like? Try not to use any thought stories in this description. Try to describe the exact sensation of what a "me" feels like. And keep a check on how much of that description is a thought story when reporting back please.
It's actually a knowing rather than a feeling; that is, it feels like I know that there is a me. The experience is that I know there is a me.
Can you see here that you have NOT used direct experience to report back to me? You were unable to find any direct experiential evidence of a "me", so you reported what thought says. When you say "I know that there is a me", you are
reporting ideas, not experiences.
All you KNOW is that you are aware of experiences. You KNOW that because you directly experience them, but you do not directly experience any feeling of a "me". You may experience sensations of a body, but you do not experience feelings of a "me". When you say "I know that there is a me", what you should have said is that there are thoughts appearing that say there is a "me".
Anyway, i'll let you answer Finloh and Vivi's questions for now.