So how can "I" tell if "my" non-existent self is fighting the loss of identity in "my" case?The ego/mind or false self in this dualistic life does fight the loss of identity. Ultimately there is no self as we know.
It is understood what is meant by "In the absolute no one does."Consider the paradox of the absolute and the relative. Ego/mind seeks control, the self of illusion, though it is a very convincing illusion. In the absolute no one does.Ok, so this is where there seems to be confusion.
If there is no one "understanding" or "practicing", it gets confusing when it's suggested that letting go and acceptance are needed. Who (or what) does the letting go and accepting?
Is it the illusory self letting go of itself? - brings to mind the image of a snake eating it's own tail.
But not understood what is meant by the 2 preceding sentences.
Still feels like there is confusion as to Who (or what) does the letting go and accepting?
Are you saying that in relative terms there IS actually a self doing the letting go and accepting but in absolute terms it's just another dance of awareness?
And by implication, what we are aiming for is to see things more from the absolute?
The old "drop/ripple in the ocean" metaphor?
Would like to see the response to this message before final questions if that's ok, as it feels like there is some doubts still.Do you feel ready for the final questions?
Love & Light,
Peter.

