Red is actually seen. You went a little too far."Red" colour is experienced as thought/concept. "Green" is experienced as a thought/concept."
The point is that you see red, but not green.
Can you see that?
Loving,
Red is actually seen. You went a little too far."Red" colour is experienced as thought/concept. "Green" is experienced as a thought/concept."
Oh yes, I see the point here. The red colour is whats in actual experience. The Green label is not. I went too far.Red is actually seen. You went a little too far.
The point is that you see red, but not green.
Can you see that?
I clearly see the that there is no controller here. No thought required. But I kept looking because there is something there. It was really elusive. It's a bit of a dynamic mix of attention, impulse and/or a bit of curiosity?How is the movement controlled?
No it does not.Does a thought control it?
No.Can a ‘controller’ of any description be located?
It just happens, theres no deciding.How is the decision made to turn the hand over?
Attention just moved to the right handWho or what chose which hand - the left or right hand for the exercise?
No. I also can't locate where the impulse or curiosity is originated from either. Theres no suggestions outside of the hand itself is the closest I could get.Can you find a separate individual or anything that is choosing when to turn the palm up or down?

Very similar to the exercise labelling experience with the prefix "I" and without "I". Also intertwined with the experience of the truth/lie. Just seeing how unnecessary that thought is, how redundant to experience, it feels cleaner and expansive.How does it FEEL to see this?
"im looking at a pink apple" - ie; label pink / label apple & theres an "I" looking at it.What about the content of thoughts, what they describe?
Only a colour/image and a thought labelling "apple". "Apple" is not in direct experience of the image colour/sensation etc.Is there really an ‘apple’ here, or only color and a thought ABOUT ‘apple’?
NoCan ‘apple’ be found in actual experience?
There is nothing in direct experience of the senses of sight, sensation, sound, smell or taste that is found to have "apple" included and could be experienced in the senses previously listed. Only in thought does this label appear and the experience of that thought does not actually change or affect actual experience at all.However, is an apple actually known?
Too much thinking.However, is an apple actually known?
There is nothing in direct experience of the senses of sight, sensation, sound, smell or taste that is found to have "apple" included and could be experienced in the senses previously listed. Only in thought does this label appear and the experience of that thought does not actually change or affect actual experience at all.
No. Understood.Did you notice that this is a yes or no question?
Is there any clear dividing line between them?
Only sensationOr only the Sensation with no clear division?
Users browsing this forum: Cedarwood, vinceschubert and 94 guests