Aftershock

Welcome to the main forum. When you are ready to start a conversation, register and once your application is processed a guide will come to talk to you.
This is one-on-one style forum, one thread per green member.
User avatar
DonnBeach
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun May 03, 2026 3:03 pm

Aftershock

Postby DonnBeach » Sun May 03, 2026 3:06 pm

LU is focused guiding for seeing there is no real, inherent 'self' - what do you understand by this?
There is absolutely no self in experience. 'I' is a thought-claim that reproduces itself. If it is sought, a new 'I' is created to seek it.

What are you looking for at LU?
I'm looking to sort out some after-the-fact stuff of a long search that essentially has come to an end. I'm also hesitant to do this because outside validation isn't something I'm keen on, especially with regard to self-discovery.

What do you expect from a guided conversation?
I have no idea. I could see it going nowhere (the highest probability), but I could also see it being a helpful place to serve as a backboard to sort some things out. Since I have to write 200 words, this is the last sentence.

What is your experience in terms of spiritual practices, seeking and inquiry?
I started to notice how baseless things were toward the end of graduate school, even things I was doing myself. I had read somewhere, a long time ago, a short story that ended with the phrase "I am". It stuck with me and kind of grew like a seed. To cut some details, I began seeing through a lot of things in my life such as my career motivations, my relationship, and more generally society's expectations and behaviors. I came across Ramana Maharshi's "Who am I?" and intensely investigated in that way for a few weeks until a "pop" in perception occurred while on a bench: that projected thought-self essentially vanished and what was left was the entire field of perception, visually oval-like (eyes) with nothing behind it. I actually looked over this in hindsight and kept seeking.

I came across Jed McKenna's book, which set me on the right track and got me focused. I spent the next three years trying to determine what was true. I wrote a lot and thought a lot. My relationship was breaking down, and I was isolating myself from pretty much everything because I was extremely one-pointed on finding truth. I suppose what I was attempting to do was determine the "ground of being", what reality really is, what "the ultimate witness" is, what Truth is.

The 'pop' situation from earlier I could make come on and off; one of the things I'd do was have it 'come on' and try to deepen into it. I'd then try to see what was seeing even that "no-I" state. This was in fact almost impossible to do without losing it again. I was essentially just creating new vantage points from which to see what was false.

When I looked at 'I', I created another version of 'I'. I actually didn't realize this for an embarrassingly long time until a couple of weeks ago, when I had my line of questioning reflected back to me via an LLM (I was pretty desperate). If I can only exist in states, and I am looking for a non-state (truth), I am chasing a ghost. 'I' was chasing 'I' round and round and round, like light bouncing off of two mirrors facing each other. There is no 'I' aside from a heavy mental thought-idea that comes and goes. And whatever truth is, it is not a thing to be attained, and it can't be hiding somewhere that I have to go to. Truth is here and now, ever present.

This realization is majority intellectual, but it is a certainty. Now, I see things pass by and happen. 'I' actually still pops up a lot but is seen through pretty easily. Looking directly, it is also obvious it's a fiction. There is more to this, though; the attempts at determining what reality is or isn't are also futile. They are conceptual overlay. If I claim that what is in front of me right now is real, I am fooling myself ('real' is arbitrary and meaningless). If I say it is not real, I am also fooling myself. What is left is an odd disorientation that includes the fluctuation of separation and non-separation. Every attempt to speculate things (self, world, whatever) is seen through and comes to a halt, and every attempt to not speculate things is seen through as well. And even the recognition of these is seen through.

On a scale from 1 to 10, how willing are you to question any currently held beliefs about 'self? 11

Admin note for DonnBeach: You can only see answers in your thread when you’re logged in. Please check your thread regularly while logged in, as email notifications don’t always work.

Return to “THE GATE”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 176 guests