Thank you for your feedback.
Halelujah :)Yeah :).Yes I know this one. What I think it means is that in the beginning there is identification and “objects” like mountains and rivers are assumed to have their own existence. Then a realisation happens and it is seen that there are no “objects” with their own existence, that it is all one, but still viewed from a place of subtle identification (this is where I have been stuck). And at the end what remains is all the Direct experiencing and nothing else, no identification, just THIS.
YesIn the beginning objects are taken as really existing, then later it is seen that objects are just labels (empty of inherent existence), and at the end it’s going back to the market, where words are still used but just as tools for communication and their emptiness is known.
Yes of course :)Grey is still a colour (seeing) :)It is just colour (or actually it is just light as here in the Netherlands there is no colour in the winter, everything is gray now that the leaves have fallen).
It is just the content of thought.What is a memory?I don’t know like I said, I don’t have memory of being that young so I cannot confirm in that way. But I was just thinking about this… does memory only happen when the mind can conceptualise things, and hence remember them in that way as concepts? If that is the case then I probably did not know anything in the sense of knowing as a concept.
They are taking place now, the only "place" there is (its not really a place)Past and memory go hand-in-hand as a memory thought (words or mental images) is believed to be referring to something that has happened in the past. Memory thoughts are also thoughts about a future that may or may not happen based on past experiences. A future thought is a thought that projects an idea about a future based on past memory. The majority of us ‘live’ in past or future, but when are those seeming memory thoughts actually taking place?
Ok yes.Sit quietly somewhere for 10 or so minutes and watch the arising thoughts. Notice the thoughts that contain content that refer to a past or future. Please don’t go to thought explanation, but just look at what the direct actual experience is.
Memory is a thought, it is made of thought, thinking.What is memory exactly? What is the memory ‘made of’?
NoIs there any difference between a ‘general’ thought and a ‘memory’ thought?
NowWHEN does the memory actually appear?
It is a belief.How is it known that a ‘memory’ thought refers to something that has happened?
OKThen, look at a thought about the future.
Its the same like any other thought, made of thought/thinking.What is the future thought ‘made of’?
NowWHEN does the future thought appear?
NoIs there a difference between a ‘general’ thought and a ‘future’ thought?
This is a beliefHow is it known that a ‘future’ thought refers to something that will happen?
No differenceThen let’s compare a thought about the past and a thought about the future.
What is the difference between the thoughts about past and future in actual experience?
Any difference is just more thought/beliefs.If there is a difference, how is that difference known exactly?
No it doesn’t actually exist so it cannot be known/experienced.Can a past or future be known?
YesOr all that is known are the AE of thoughts labelled as ‘memory’ that are appearing now?
Last week is a label which is here NOW and it is actually just thought/thinking.In actual experience:-
Where is last week?
Same as last weekWhere is yesterday?
Also same as any of these labelsWhere is this morning?
Nowhere to be foundWhere is five minutes ago?
Just a thoughtWhere is one minute ago?
A label in thoughtWhere is last night?
A concept in thoughtWhere is midnight?
An idea in thoughtWhere is tomorrow morning?
it is just a concept/labelWhere is next week?
same like the othersWhere is next month?
Yes this is clear, these are just concepts in thought labeled as memory/past or futureCan you find any of these? Or only ‘memory’ thoughts about these appearing now?
Yes that is an assumption.So if a memory is nothing but a generic thought, how can you know for sure that you have been a baby, that you had or had not experiences and that you were aware, OR that is an assumption?
Im struggling because I HAVE TO use language to communicate, and there is of course a habit of communicating in a certain way.Let’s play language as it seems that you can’t make the difference between language and direct experience.But awareness is not knowing as concept, it is just seeing/witnessing without holding on to anything.
No I would have to say that the logical conclusion would be that there is no perceiving either.If there is no perceiver and nothing to be perceived, is there perceiving at all?
Indeed awareness is not there as an entity, and being aware related to that entity is then also not there. Actually I wrote a whole story here to prove that its there, but then I was LOOKING NOW and I think that I see your point now. I don’t seem to be able to see “as the awareness” when LOOKING in NOW. Because “seeing as awareness” seems to be just mind trying to make a story of it - of “I am seeing THIS now”. But it cannot ever describe it, cause there is nothing there to describe. This is so weird I have to admit. There is nothing there, I am a bit shocked to be honest. There is just nothing…If there is no awareness as an entity, and no-thing to be aware of, is there being aware/awareness at all? Awareness of nothing is an oxymoron, a play of language :)
Yes I see that, these were just stories from the past.To know something is merely to attach a word to it – even if it is just “witnessing” (you have to know what you are witnessing and that you are witnessing, witnessing is still a concept, and don't start me on the duration of witnessing, which suggest continuation). To be aware means "to know about", some common synonyms of aware are cognizant, conscious, and sensible. So let's look at all of these words - consciousness, awareness, cognition.
By using a word, you create something out of nothing (concepts, objects, reality, conditions, qualities, etc). Without words, there is no knowing. To know that you are aware is knowledge. Without words, there is no framework to separate, categorize, interpret, or define. Awareness is a word that is just attached to nothing.
Yes indeed.Consciousness is not a mystical entity but a by-product of memory. It arises only when memory supplies the words needed to categorize and interpret raw "experience". Without memory, there can be no consciousness as you understand it. And what is memory? A repository of words, mental images and mental constructs.
YESConsciousness, then, is not an awareness of the present but a narration of the present built on the words stored in memory. The so-called “conscious mind” is merely a storyteller, drawing on memory (thought) to weave the illusion of an observer/witness.
My mind is in utter disbelief hahaha.. but yes this is so clear now.Awareness is not some innate, universal truth but a mental construct. It is the mind’s ability to narrate its own sensations. Strip away the words, and there is no awareness—only the raw, unprocessed flux.
Indeed there is nothing.The idea of “awareness” is rooted in the same linguistic delusion as the concept of self. You are aware of something only because language supplies the framework to distinguish it from everything else. Without words, there’s no “I” to be aware, no “thing” to be aware of, and no “awareness” to connect them.
Yes this is clearI gave you the baby analogy to force mind’s logic to see the emptiness of ALL concepts (awareness included). A baby simply exists. Before acquiring language, a baby doesn’t distinguish between self and environment, between sensations and objects, between peaks and troughs in experience. Awareness emerges only as words are learned, carving the flux of existence into categories and relationships – something to be aware of. In the begining it could be very basic - before the development of mental concepts there is still pattern recognition in various shapes, and once the concepts are attached to that, its' game on. That’s why you don’t have memories of anything, but you are presuming that you were aware (you are imposing a quality so you can justify the idea - basically a thought). Furthermore, as the baby’s name has been repeated that many times, the self-awareness starts "forming". That’s why babies experience separation anxiety at the age of about 18m – they become separate from the whole. To be aware of oneself is to be burdened by the illusion of separation, to carry the weight of a fabricated identity. Without awareness, there is no conflict—only the natural flow of life.
I can SEE this now, (or the lack of this really) thank you so much for sticking with me. But I am curious if this will still be my experience tomorrow. I will keep LOOKING and report back if "awareness" tries to creep back in somewhere... hahaha ;)Awareness is simply the mind narrating sensations. Consciousness is the memory bank of those narrations. Thought is the manipulation of those narrations into new forms. Without words, these phenomena do not exist. Strip away language, and what remains is pure biological functioning, devoid of self, meaning, or narrative. Thought, awareness, consciousness, and memory are one and the same. They are mental constructs, dependent entirely on words. Without words, they collapse into nothingness. Cases like dementia expose the mental nature of these constructs, proving that without words, there is no self, no thought, no awareness, and no consciousness. Life operates without the need for words, knowledge, or awareness.
*Example of experience broken down into DE
Having a glass of red wine
Seeing the red colour = sight(seeing)
Hearing the sound of the kristal glass = sound (hearing)
Smelling the wine = smell(smelling)
Taking a sip = taste(tasting)
Feeling the wineglass in my hand = sensation (feeling)
Thought how wonderful it tastes = thought (thinking)
Love,
Marina

