The entity can be labeled "Ian"; is there an Ian that is not merely a label? What is it?There is an entity here which can be labeled Ian...there is evidence of this, (as i see it this is not the point which the Looking for no self is trying to make, it is not not questioning life that erupts into unique living formations
Is there any evidence of Ian that is not a thought? What is it? Please be very specific.
No there is nothing that is anything more than a mere label called Ian. there is no evidence, thoughts have been confused as evidence of an Ian, but only ever thoughts.
We don't look for no self; there is no no-self to find. Same as there is no self. And we are absolutely questioning whether Life is unique, i.e. separate.
what i meant here is we Look for evidence of a Self as a way to get clear that Self is an idea found only in thoughts. Eventually it is seen to be ideas only. Of course a no no self is also an idea in thoughts which is seen too.
Is there any separate/unique self at all; is there anything at all that remains outside of Life living itself in all its expressions?
No there is no separate self at all. What i mean by unique is distinguishable as life being here and life being there, ie life /Ian in uk and life/Nona in New Zealand...unless i am missing something here. There is nothing at all outside of life...as its all there is.
Nona ...Thats all i've got at present. Perhaps something is being missed here. Can i ask you what your take is on the evidence of experience that this experience labelled Ian, seems differentiated from that experience labelled Nona, is it not legitimate to say these experiences are unique is certain ways? If that's not the case, there is something in understanding that Ian is missing, which will need to be Seen.
love
Nona[/quote]

