Dear Jon,
This is THE problem. preconceptions.
How can it be predicted how no self will be experienced?
Yeah Jon, I cannot say how it will be experienced. It will all just be ideas I have of something I haven't yet experienced.
So what on earth are you talking about? A pot of gold at the end of a rainbow?
I'm just sitting and desiring something that I don't know a thing about.
It's nothing but ideas of something I've heard and read of. I could go on and write a passage describing some aspects of it but I've already done that before, and they're still just ideas, Jon. I don't know what I'm desiring.
But the desire of that is what has brought me this far, and there's a fear that I might slacken, lose direction or even motivation in this journey if I let go of that desire. In one sense, I'm holding onto it dearly because I don't want to do something that might probably stop taking me towards it or take me away from it.
The simplicity was in dropping all expectations and just seeing what would happen
Right Jon, I realize that I should, too.
Well that is really interesting Raam. So how about now? Does that statement resonate?
Once the apprehension associated with losing a part of myself went away, it turned into just a mental statement - a conclusion that stays at the back of the mind. The "chill"ness sort of dissolved slowly over the next couple of days as I somehow intuitively knew it would. I had decided not to fight to keep it and to do full justice to it by staying in it while it lasted, so I didn't spend myself trying to hold onto it.
Today, it has just become a statement that the mind says "I know" about non-duality, and at best, is an understanding that's at the back of the mind when explaining some Vedantic concept to someone in a conversation.
I seem to have become immune to any effect the statement might have on me. I realized that it might be best to stick to enquiry and meditation, and to delay hearing or reading such foundational statements until I was a little more receptive, but I've already had too much of reading and listening. Also, even receptivity is a characteristic of mind/thought and shouldn't be a factor when it comes to awakening right?
I suppose it had an impact while I was realizing that I needn't worry, and subsequently there's just an ordinary, mundane neutrality about it. I would mentally agree with the statement, that's all.
That articulates it well and I know what you're talking about.
Right, Jon:)
. <I didn't make much of it. I saw it as just a relief that I didn't have to amputate a part of my existence.>
Can you say more about what you mean?
To be clear, I still don't know what self realization feels like. I've made up my mind to walk into it, whatever it turns out to be like, and to forgive myself even if I find it scary or uncomfortable.
Having had my initial exposure to ideas of self realization from traditional Hindu texts on Advaita and some limited understanding of the works of Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi, I carried this idea that it involved the destruction of a local self as a necessary step in the process. Even when I read the works of modern western teachers, there were statements like "I thought there would still be a self left to experience something until it happened" and like Adyashanti says (this isn't verbatim, I think I'm paraphrasing) "Enlightenment is a destructive process.. it is the complete eradication of everything we imagined to be true", I was pretty worried about what it might feel like to have myself removed - even psychologically or spiritually and to readjust and realign whatever remained of myself to a deeper, more fundamental truth.
After this particular conversation with this person, Teja, the grip on that idea of a tangible, almost physical removal of an I from the current experience, loosened. I realized that the statement was not about removing what I am but about realizing that I already don't exist. That didn't seem to bad, because it's already true, and it's not particularly a problem.
Sure, I might realize that a lot of what I thought about myself and of reality might turn out to be false, but that's just understanding and assimilating truth, so it no longer seemed like something I had to worry about. An actual transmutation wasn't what was needed. I didn't have to have some affliction called the "ego" to be removed, but just needed to see that I already don't exist.
I could copy down screenshots of the conversation if you'd like. It's just on a comments section from Quora.
I still don't know what it's going to feel like, Jon, I understand that. I might still be wrong about what I understood from the conversation with Teja. It might still be psychologically hurtful or a relief, and I'm okay with what it turns out to be. I'd like to know the truth for what it actually is.
Merely? Are you serious?
That was poor communication from me, I guess, sorry. There was nothing inadequate about the peace or the relaxation, it was joyful and I felt nothing short of contented.
In addition to trying to express its simplicity, I suppose I also unnecessarily brought in some modesty in describing it, sort of reiterating that it was perhaps not much in comparison with the state you are in, particularly because it was a temporary experience.
This is good. See what happens if you simply forget to remember those expectations.
Yes Jon, will tell you what tha's like.
Love,
Raam