Conviction is made of thought.What is conviction? How is it experienced?
Thought is fueled by belief or identification in/with it.As always with these questions, report from experience. No theory.
Now, looking in experience (actually the memory of experience) locate the sensation (or emotion) and look at the thoughts associated with it. Then dismiss (temporarily) the thoughts - put them in the background, and observe if the sensations change.
Sensations/feelings dissipate when detached from thought.
I have come to understand that the sense of self is simply a collection of thoughts, emotions, and labels that constantly change
Yes, this collection of thoughts and also the patterns of thoughts and every day "doing" fuels the sense of self.Would you say that this is a source of a SENSE of self?
The patterns in every day life has a "me"-shaped hole in it, like a groove that the usual doings of every day life fits into and perpetuates the idea of this separate self named "T".
Hmmm...
Could this be the "attachments" that I hear referenced in these discussions?
No. Not at all. That was a careless expression. There is an illusion of a separate self named "T", when that illusion falls away there will be no self, no person left, only emptiness.Do you imagine that there is a "truly" you?
Very very subtle labels (thoughts) provoke a sensation/feeling.How does "taking credit" manifest? What are the sensations and thoughts that attract the label "credit"?
Not the gross thoughts, the obvious narration that I hear in my head right now as I type these words. Much more subtle.
For example; Someone laughs at something I said, very subtly a label "pride" comes in and brings a fluttering sensation in the chest. This combination is interpreted by me as "taking credit", as thought/mind saying "I made a joke and made someone laugh".
This, I think, is the crux of it.Is it possible that seeing through the illusion and having a paradigm shift are not connected?
Have I seen through the illusion? Or have I just looked for the illusion and not found it?
There has never been the slightest "Aha!"-moment. It has just been like solving a basic mathematical problem.
1+2=3, yeah ok.
Direct experience experiment + direct experience = No separate self, ok.
One could argue that I'm expecting too much, sure. I'm absolutely not expecting any kind of fireworks, just.. something.
I've checked that the stove isn't on several times but STILL every time I leave the house there's this feeling that the stove is somehow on. When do I KNOW it isn't on?
Well, I think maybe in my case, being a very analytical person might require some extra work perhaps. I don't think this is always a binary experience as in: looking and not finding a self - BOOM! Bob's your uncle.The brief at LU is to focus on the 1st fetter - recognizing that self is a concept. My experience is that if this is 'properly' done, then other fetters will weaken or even fall.
The shift that you seek will happen when all of the necessary conditions are present and aligned. We don't know what they are, but shuffling around the investigation makes it likely to happen.
Do you have it in mind that the last time that you searched for a self that one wasn't found?
with this in mind, is there any point in going and looking again?
I'm not trying to be difficult. I'm sincerely honest when I say that something, maybe intuition, is pointing me to keep chasing the "me"-feeling.
When I walk to work, Thought: "he/she looked at me" Inquiry: "who did they look at? who is here?"
Someone asks me for a task, Thought: "I don't know if I'm able to live up to their expectation" Inquiry: "Who? Who isn't able to live up to expectations? IS there someone, anything here?"
So now we are focussing on why we don't believe this. ..or is it that our conditioning (to respond to these things) is n conflict with what we know of the sense of self?[/quote]the sense of self is simply a collection of thoughts, emotions, and labels that constantly change
I'm not sure I follow what you mean here.
Our conditioning (the groove I wrote about above) definitely snags us up quickly and we follow the beaten path as if on autopilot.
I will attempt a clumsy analogy to summarize. Driving a car with stick shift.
I've read all the instructions and I completely understand the theory of stick shift driving.
I've started the car a couple of times but there's something with connecting the drag in the clutch that doesn't quite happen.
I'm burning the clutch here because I feel soon, very soon I'll understand what this combination of shift, clutch and drag I've read about and understand intellectually amounts to.

