Hi Bill,
I appreciate your inspiring account.
We discount thought in this inquiry because the inquiry is about knowing who we really are ... and who we really are is NOT thought. It can't be found in thought.
Yes.
Here is something I wrote in my "awakening journal". I'm interested to know how this applies to your direct experience.
First, we have a belief, such as "there is a separate self". Then we see how the illusion is constructed and we adopt the opposite belief. This is still conceptual, and so doubt will continue to arise. Finally, we see the big picture and then the question, "Is there a self?" no longer makes sense. Then no doubts and no further questions arise.
This can be seen by analogy to Santa Claus (of course). At first, we believe there is an actual man with magical powers called Santa Claus. Then we see how the illusion is created and we believe there is no such actual man. But the question, "Is Santa an actual fire-breathing dragon?" never arises. This question is nonsensical because it contains a contradiction (between "actual" and "fire-breathing dragon"). Nonsensical questions don't arise. The categories of truth, falsehood, belief, and doubt are inapplicable to nonsense.
I had been proceeding under the belief that there is no self. Naturally, this leaves some room for doubt. Today, I saw this: When undivided, ineffable THIS is seen, ALL questions are nonsensical. All questions contain the assumption that meanings exist. “Meanings”, being relationships between parts, is nonsensical because experience doesn’t contain parts. Can meanings exist outside of direct experience? No, there is nothing outside of direct experience. Which brings us to Mu. I understand Mu to mean something like, "unask the question". Mu is the answer to ALL questions.
SEE that it is impossible for a thought to refer to anything other than a thought.