Hi Lubo!
I hope you are doing good.
Thanks a lot for your response.
Do you really expect thoughts to tell you what is going on here?
No. You asked me to tell you my experience from my direct experience. So I told you everything from my direct experience. There were thoughts in my direct experience that's why I told you about those thoughts.
Please read again all questions on which you replay:
but the answer that appeared as thought is "I don't know.".
Find the answers, they are here, and do not wait for the thoughts to say the answer, OK?
How is it even possible to reply without converting my direct experience into thoughts?
If I will disregard the thoughts then our discussion will end here and you will not get any response from me.
Let me give you an example:
Your Question from your last post: What is here?
If I Look in my DE and try to look at what is here then a few
"thoughts" will appear & say Here is "seen, sounds, sensations, taste, smell". But this answer came from my thoughts and these thoughts are based on past knowledge. But in reality, "I don't know" what is here. And you do not want me to share my thoughts with you. If you do not want me to share my thoughts with you then How can I even share anything with you?
If I say "Here are seen, sounds, sensations, taste, smell" This answer is still from the thought and that is based on past knowledge in reality I do not know what is here.
If I say "I don't know". That answer is also from thought but that answer is more close to DE or Reality and that answer is not based on my past knowledge or memory.
But If I disregard/ignore the thought altogether then I will not be able to come up with any answer then you will not get any reply from me.
Does This know that appear for you?
If I say: "No". <- That is also a thought based on my assumption. In reality, "I don't know" if this know or not. But the answer "I don't know" is also from thought but closer to the truth and not based on any assumption or prior knowledge.
But you want me to disregard & ignore all of my thoughts and then answer. Sorry, that's not possible for me.
Without thought, I can not come up with the answer to this question.
Is it possible for the empty space to do something to any appearance? Look!
If I say: "No". <- That is also a thought based on my assumption. In reality, "I don't know" if space can do something or not. But the answer "I don't know" is also from thought but closer to the truth and not based on any assumption or prior knowledge.
But you want me to disregard & ignore all of my thoughts and then answer. Sorry, that's not possible for me.
Without thought, I can not come up with the answer to this question.
Is it possible for the empty space to become something else, but not space?
If I say: "No". <- That is also a thought based on my assumption. In reality, "I don't know" if space can become something else or not. But the answer "I don't know" is also from thought but closer to the truth and not based on any assumption or prior knowledge.
But you want me to disregard & ignore all of my thoughts and then answer. Sorry, that's not possible for me.
Without thought, I can not come up with the answer to this question.
Does the empty space have a brain?
If I say: "No". <- That is also a thought based on my assumption. In reality, "I don't know" if space has its own brain or not. But the answer "I don't know" is also from thought but closer to the truth and not based on any assumption or prior knowledge.
But you want me to disregard & ignore all of my thoughts and then answer. Sorry, that's not possible for me.
Without thought, I can not come up with the answer to this question.
If you think it's possible to answer those questions without thought then please give me an example so I can understand how to answer without thought.
Waiting for your response.
Thanks
Regards
Jawad
