No efforts are required to see whatever is in front if eyes are open and the same with hearing and thoughts.
Good.
Is what you said from direct experience ? I recommend to you to do the exercise of looking at what you said :But if I have to see a particular thing or hear a particular sound, or think about a particular topic, it does need efforts, intention and direction of attention towards that. And that means an “I” (or someone) has to make that effort.
Let's say : you listen to the news. Sure, attention is directed to the news but is there a you, or someone needed to direct the attention ? Is there someone needed to make the body walk one pace after the other ? There is no need for deduction like "it means so and so". During our dialog you sign for Looking at direct experience : seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching (sensations). All other stuff is thought story.
No, it is not the same kind of looking for finding “I”. I is the one which is trying to find the tiger under my bed and not finding it.
Before looking for a tiger, look first at this "I" : does it exist ? If you say yes, describe it for me.
Are you speaking through direct experience ? How do you know that "I" exists prior to experience ? Does any word exist before the experience of it ?It takes effort and intention to try to find a tiger under the bed. "I" exists prior to having that direct experience of not finding the tiger.
It is not a labeling game here. You have to see it for yourself. Awareness = being aware, knowing principle.Yes, I see the difference. Perhaps labeling it as “I” is a matter of habit and thereby making it personal. Changing this habit to label it as awareness will take intention, effort, and time.
What is coming up when you read this : there is no you, in any shape or form, there never was, it will never be
Best wishes
Warissem

