Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

All threads where seeing happens are stored here. The complete list, sorted by guide, contains all links. The archives include threads of those that came to LU already seeing as well.
You are welcome to continue your conversation with your guide here after your name is turned blue.
User avatar
pockets
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:02 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby pockets » Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:49 am

I have been thinking more about your question all day today:
What is a mind in your own words ?
After further looking, I am not certain my last answer was fully from direct experience. I don't know the distinction between a "mind" and this knowing. There is no experience happening outside of this mind/knowing. Maybe my definition of "mind" is not helpful, but the best analogy I can think of is that all of this experience is happening on a screen, and each moment that screen is showing something, either a sound, or a sight, or a thought, or taste, or a touch, feeling, etc. And it can (and does) change very rapidly sometimes, and sometimes "I" forget there is a screen. The mind/knowing is the screen itself. It's not quite a perfect analogy for me because I don't know what it would mean if the screen was "off", but its the closest description I can make given my experience.

Sorry, I know this answer is very "thoughty" but I just had to follow up, because I was not satisfied with my description from my previous response.

Thank you,

User avatar
warissem
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 6:45 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby warissem » Tue Mar 16, 2021 11:32 am

Hi pockets
A mind is a lens (for lack of a better term) in which experiences (sensations/thoughts/everything) are perceived... It is simultaneously the "thing" that enables experiences to exist and the experiences themselves. It is the foundation of "my" existence. It feels like the background/canvas of the entire experience that is happening.


What is the title of the book ? It is not an answer through direct experience. I read the answer in your last post : look directly at the concept "mind" and tell me where it points to in direct experience.
A key rule : all concepts are thoughts. There are thoughts which point to objects and there are thoughts which point to other thoughts.

The emotion I was referring to in the last post was one of confusion regarding the "distinction" between this knowing and contents of thought. This emotion comes when there is hazy seeing, and there is difficulty distinguishing between thoughts and experience. This is an especially bizarre feeling because I have /seen/ things to be a certain way, but then am unable to see it clearly consistently. Does this make sense?

This is an exercise for you :

1. Imagine holding sensation in the right hand and thought in the left hand.
Does thought, on the one hand, and sensation, on the other, know about each other?
Is there a link between the two?

2. Imagine sensation and thought are resting on either side of a pair of scales. When sensation is looked at it gets heavier. When thought is looked at it gets heavier.
Is it possible to look at both thought and sensation at the same time to balance the scales?

In regards to the emotion surrounding this actual "knowing" feeling specifically, I wouldn't say "beautiful", because there is no awe/surprise/wonder involved... but I would say its very passive and easy, it just is what it is... but this is only when there is clear seeing.
There is always clear seeing : sometimes there is a blue sky, sometimes there are clouds.

I would also say that when there is knowing, it feels obvious, like "woah, it was here all along". But then when it "goes away", so to speak, it fees merely conceptual.
Sure there is a vivid presence during the experience. Afterwhile, there is a memory of the experience which is seen as thoughts about the experience. This functioning is also available for a cup of coffee you had this morning. The knowing of the experience and the knowing of thoughts about the experience are both clear. Aren’t they ?

Warissem

User avatar
pockets
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:02 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby pockets » Wed Mar 17, 2021 5:37 am

Hello Warissem,
look directly at the concept "mind" and tell me where it points to in direct experience.
The concept of mind is a thought. When I try to conceptualize it in direct experience, I only observe complicated thoughts/labels, which are recognized what what they are quickly.

1. Imagine holding sensation in the right hand and thought in the left hand.
Does thought, on the one hand, and sensation, on the other, know about each other?
Is there a link between the two?
The sensation "knows" nothing of the thought. The sensation is as bare as a "thing" can be. The direct sensation of a touch is just a touch. The thought has contents that are relating to the sensation. I can witness a thought "explaining" the source of the touch "it is the shirt on my skin" for example. But the thought and the ACTUAL sensation are separate in my experience.

2. Imagine sensation and thought are resting on either side of a pair of scales. When sensation is looked at it gets heavier. When thought is looked at it gets heavier.
Is it possible to look at both thought and sensation at the same time to balance the scales?
I spent a fair amount of time with this exercise. I cannot feel thought clearly and sensation clearly at the same time whatsoever. It is always one or the other. The only time I "feel them both" is in the contents of thoughts, which is reallly just itself another thought.

After a while, there is a memory of the experience which is seen as thoughts about the experience. This functioning is also available for a cup of coffee you had this morning. The knowing of the experience and the knowing of thoughts about the experience are both clear. Aren’t they ?
Yes. Yes exactly, this is exactly what I was trying to convey. I can see this distinction. That analogy makes sense to me, thank you.

User avatar
warissem
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 6:45 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby warissem » Wed Mar 17, 2021 9:38 am

Hi pockets

Is there any doubt about seeing through the illusion of a separate self ? Feel free to discuss it here.

Is seeking still going on and if so, what are you looking for?

Are you ready for the final questions ?

Warissem

User avatar
pockets
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:02 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby pockets » Wed Mar 17, 2021 6:46 pm

Hi Warissem,

Thanks for your response and patience throughout this process. I have reviewed our entire interaction, and have a couple comments:

In your first response to me you said:
The truth is that : the experience is trully here now but beliefs are different from the experience.
I didn't know what this meant when I read it the first time, but I can see it now. Beliefs are concepts that are being layered as a filter of the raw experience. But those beliefs and concepts are also part of experience. A cloud cannot exist without a sky to be in.


Early in this dialog you asked about my expectations. My answer was as follows:
I have a loose understanding of what I expect from descriptions others have given, but when I truly try to put those to the side, it’s very hard to say what I actually expect. I guess the best description would be “prolonged states of being /here/”. When I try to just experience raw sensations in the exact moment of now, I am “here” for an instant, but not long enough to really feel immersed/present. The thoughts and labels come so incredibly quickly, that I almost don't even have a sense for what those sensations really /are/. It feels like I go from processing a sight/smell/feeling to analyzing that sight/smell/feeling so quickly, that there almost isn’t a distinction between the two concepts.
After reflecting on this sentiment, I have a couple thoughts: I still feel this haziness between the mental activity and the "physical" perception of sensations, however I now have experienced that they are both just experience, and neither are "my" own. Though this is not my default state. As you said in your last response, I can say with confidence that the knowing of the experience and the knowing of thoughts about the experience are both clear, which I absolutely could not say with confidence before our conversation. There is no longer the expectation to "prolong" these states, or to "get rid of thoughts", but rather just to be aware of thought content as thought content.


Your response was the following:
You are always being here 24/7. There is no need to prolong something. Yes there are sensations, thoughts and labels, it is normal and ordinary.
When I read this response the first time, it did not register with me. To me it felt like there were two separate states of being -- being aware, and being on autopilot. In some ways this still feels true, but when I look closely, I can see that even while being absorbed in the contents of thoughts, "i" am still here, always. To use your words, the sky is still there despite there being clouds. I see this.


Later you asked, and I responded:
Is there a separate self driving the show ?
No one is driving the show, the show is happening always. 90% of my day I forget there is even a show, and when I do spontaneously remember, I realize that even though I wasn’t actively aware during that period of time prior to “waking up”, that the show was still going on nonetheless. When I do remember there is a show, I try to process just the visceral sensations I am experiencing, but almost immediately find myself adding labels/sinking into thoughts.
This is still true in my experience. Having seen more clearly the lack of a self driving the show, this feels more concrete in my experience, however my answer still remains the same.

I also reviewed our dialog regarding intentions and the nature of thoughts, and realize that my understanding of how they "work" has changed dramatically from our interaction, and from looking very closely at how they arise/change.

At one point I gave an answer:
There were no body sensations that were me. Almost feels like i am whats "behind" all the sensations. When I touched my face i did not feel "behind them" in the directional sense, but behind them in a observational sense, like they were on a screen.

To which you responded:
Look at direct experience and tell me if awareness is behind sensations ? If it is the case, there will be a separation between them. Have you seen really that there is no separation between the knowing and what is known ?
And I now see that even the idea of “separation” of my sensations is not real. Awareness is not “behind” sensations.


Today you asked:
Is there any doubt about seeing through the illusion of a separate self ?
There is no doubt that i have had direct experiences that have fundamentally changed my perception of “I”. The phrase “Illusion of separate self” is still a bit ambiguous to me though. I have seen clearly that there is no “I” running the show. I have seen there is no separation between “me” and experience. I have seen, for short periods of time, through pure sensate experience, that that is all there is. I have seen how fast the filter of my thoughts/labels construct “me”. So in some sense, there is no doubt of what I have seen. But it doesn’t fully feel real/solidified because I cannot maintain this experience. It is not my default. It is not easily reproducible for me.

I have also seen that when I am looking without labels, that there is very rapid perception of sensate reality, and it is seen as "one at a time". I cannot clearly perceive a thought and sensation at the exact same moment. I can see attention/awareness move very quickly between objects.


Today I went back and watched the two videos you previously linked:
In this second video, she expresses feelings of joy and delight and awe. And I currently am unable to relate to this at this moment. I feel ease, and extreme curiosity and desire to understand better, but these feel like thoughts. So when you ask:
Is seeking still going on and if so, what are you looking for?
I would be lying if “I” said I wasn’t still seeking in some capacity. I am seeking for more clear seeing. I am seeking for the ability to not seek. I can see these are concepts, and I can see that they are not “me”, yet they remain at times very strongly.

Without doubt, I am (at times) able to distinguish my true direct experience and sensations before the labeling/thoughts/filter. This is something I didn’t even know was possible before our conversation. I get caught up in thoughts about thoughts, and have been trying to just relax, and see them for what they are. So... as a very long winded answer to your question. I do not know if I am ready for the final questions or not. I sense that I am on the beginning of a journey, with a better toolset to understand my "true" nature, though I do not feel like there has been massive shift in my "being". I hope what I am explaining makes sense. I recognize that there are a lot of concepts/ego in my answer, but I am trying to be as honest and straightforward as I can with you to respect the time and energy that you are dedicating to "me"... a stranger on the internet. I am extremely grateful.

-Pockets (Kevin).

User avatar
warissem
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 6:45 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby warissem » Thu Mar 18, 2021 10:19 am

Hi Kevin
Thanks for your response and patience throughout this process. I have reviewed our entire interaction, and have a couple comments:
You are welcome. You have done a resume of the dialog, the sole goal is to see that there is no you, no separate self.

There is no doubt that i have had direct experiences that have fundamentally changed my perception of “I”. The phrase “Illusion of separate self” is still a bit ambiguous to me though.

What is illusion of separate self in direct experience ?

I have seen clearly that there is no “I” running the show. I have seen there is no separation between “me” and experience. I have seen, for short periods of time, through pure sensate experience, that that is all there is. I have seen how fast the filter of my thoughts/labels construct “me”. So in some sense, there is no doubt of what I have seen. But it doesn’t fully feel real/solidified because I cannot maintain this experience. It is not my default. It is not easily reproducible for me.

Yes, the experience is not reproducible for whom ? Who or what is wanting to maintain the experience ? Anyway can any experience be maintained ? Let’s say experience of joy, or sorrow. An experience comes and goes but the knowing is still here. What is seen can never be unseen. That’s why I ask : are you 100 % certain that there is no you, no separate self ?

I have also seen that when I am looking without labels, that there is very rapid perception of sensate reality, and it is seen as "one at a time". I cannot clearly perceive a thought and sensation at the exact same moment. I can see attention/awareness move very quickly between objects.

It is of no need to look for experiences of seeing without labeling, there is effort in it. The case is to just be what you are : seeing is happening, labeling is happening. It is OK.

Today I went back and watched the two videos you previously linked:
https://youtu.be/wyNwhK2Ur1c
https://youtu.be/WNiZiCwcBZU

In this second video, she expresses feelings of joy and delight and awe. And I currently am unable to relate to this at this moment. I feel ease, and extreme curiosity and desire to understand better, but these feel like thoughts. So when you ask:
Is seeking still going on and if so, what are you looking for?
I would be lying if “I” said I wasn’t still seeking in some capacity. I am seeking for more clear seeing. I am seeking for the ability to not seek. I can see these are concepts, and I can see that they are not “me”, yet they remain at times very strongly.
Joy and delight are experiences, they come and go. The habits, old tendencies of this body –mind functioning won’t disappear in a click of a finger, they won’t disappear at the end of this dialog. Seeing that there is no you driving the show is a beginning of a process of disentification with body – mind. There is still a kind of seeking but you know for sure that there is no you to seek, it is a day to day happening to no one. Is there a seeker in any shape or form ?

I do not know if I am ready for the final questions or not. I sense that I am on the beginning of a journey, with a better toolset to understand my "true" nature, though I do not feel like there has been massive shift in my "being".
You can give answers to what is called "final questions" at any time, it is not an exam. The questions are given to give an end to the dialog. You are ready when you have seen for sure that there is no you, no separate self in any shape or form.
Now you have spoken about a massive shift : would you elaborate on this massive shift you are expecting ?

I hope what I am explaining makes sense. I recognize that there are a lot of concepts/ego in my answer, but I am trying to be as honest and straightforward as I can with you to respect the time and energy that you are dedicating to "me"... a stranger on the internet. I am extremely grateful.
Thank you for your honesty.

Warissem

User avatar
pockets
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:02 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby pockets » Fri Mar 19, 2021 12:58 am

Hi Warissem,
What is illusion of separate self in direct experience ?
There is no separate self or illusion of separate self in my direct experience, other than within the contents of thoughts. A separate self is a concept. An illusion of this is also a concept.

Yes, the experience is not reproducible for whom ? Who or what is wanting to maintain the experience ? Anyway can any experience be maintained ?
The only who/what that is trying to "maintain" the experience is a concept/content of thought. I recognize this when looking closely and acknowledging the thoughts as thoughts. In the moment, when this is acknowledged, the "wanting" goes away, temporarily.

Let’s say experience of joy, or sorrow. An experience comes and goes but the knowing is still here. What is seen can never be unseen. That’s why I ask : are you 100 % certain that there is no you, no separate self ?
I can see the distinction between emotions and knowing. I can see the distinctions between thoughts and knowing. Knowing is always present. I believe this cannot be unseen. But when you ask "are you 100 % certain that there is no you, no separate self", it is very hard for me to say this with 100% certainty.

Joy and delight are experiences, they come and go. The habits, old tendencies of this body –mind functioning won’t disappear in a click of a finger, they won’t disappear at the end of this dialog. Seeing that there is no you driving the show is a beginning of a process of disentification with body – mind. There is still a kind of seeking but you know for sure that there is no you to seek, it is a day to day happening to no one.
I have seen there is no me driving the show. When we started our dialogue, I could not say this. I felt like I could (to an extent) control my thoughts, and my intentions. Now I can see/know this is not the case, at least when I look carefully and honestly.
Is there a seeker in any shape or form?
There is no seeker, but there is "seeking" in the contents of thoughts. Thoughts feel real, and for so long, up until now, have been real to "me". Is separating the seeker from the concept of seekING part of this journey?

Now you have spoken about a massive shift : would you elaborate on this massive shift you are expecting ?
The shift that I am referring to is exactly what you mentioned above: "a process of disidentification with body-mind". A shift away from being a "separate" entity whose thoughts/emotions are them.

For a concrete example: since starting this process, experiences/thoughts/emotions have been much more noticeable and detached, from the sense of self that I have lived with my whole life. However, when I stub my toe, or feel deep sadness/anxiety, this illusory attachment to "I" and "my pain" and "my sadness" returns. I can even recognize it, and see it for what it is. I can see the sadness as an emotion that is not me, or even "mine". Yet the pain remains. This is related to the shift I am referring to.

Even my daily mediations have changed. I used to meditate and focus on the breath for 45 minutes, and would occasionally catch "my mind" wandering every now and then. Now, after our dialogue, I feel so many sensations, and observe thoughts come and go constantly during the meditation. These sensations and thoughts don't feel like "mine", and more interestingly, 'I" don't feel like an observer of these sensations. The sensations just ARE. The experience just is.

Thank you again for all of this,

Warissem

User avatar
warissem
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 6:45 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby warissem » Fri Mar 19, 2021 11:37 am

Hi Kevin
There is no separate self or illusion of separate self in my direct experience, other than within the contents of thoughts. A separate self is a concept. An illusion of this is also a concept
.
Yes.

The only who/what that is trying to "maintain" the experience is a concept/content of thought. I recognize this when looking closely and acknowledging the thoughts as thoughts. In the moment, when this is acknowledged, the "wanting" goes away, temporarily.

Good, the thought “I ” continue to arise but you do recognize it as a thought.

I can see the distinction between emotions and knowing. I can see the distinctions between thoughts and knowing. Knowing is always present. I believe this cannot be unseen. But when you ask "are you 100 % certain that there is no you, no separate self", it is very hard for me to say this with 100% certainty.

What is missing ?

I have seen there is no me driving the show. When we started our dialogue, I could not say this. I felt like I could (to an extent) control my thoughts, and my intentions. Now I can see/know this is not the case, at least when I look carefully and honestly.

Fine.

There is no seeker, but there is "seeking" in the contents of thoughts. Thoughts feel real, and for so long, up until now, have been real to "me". Is separating the seeker from the concept of seekING part of this journey?

An exercise about thoughts :
Let's look at the difference between thought content and the content of direct experience.

Put a glass of water on the table then close your eyes and imagine this glass of cool fresh water in your hands.
Feel the weight of the glass, its texture, the temperature. Does the water sparkle? Have an imagining sip. Feel the coolness in the mouth running down to the stomach, the refreshing feeling.
Now open your eyes, take the glass of water and drink it.

What is the difference between thought content and the content of direct experience in the world of the 5 senses and what do they have in common?

The shift that I am referring to is exactly what you mentioned above: "a process of disidentification with body-mind". A shift away from being a "separate" entity whose thoughts/emotions are them.
There is seeing that there is no you, no separate self, driving the show in daily life. As I said before, this dis-identification won’t happen in a finger click. It needs vigilance : during each activity there is a need to look at the “I” and recognize it as a concept, an illusion.

For a concrete example: since starting this process, experiences/thoughts/emotions have been much more noticeable and detached, from the sense of self that I have lived with my whole life. However, when I stub my toe, or feel deep sadness/anxiety, this illusory attachment to "I" and "my pain" and "my sadness" returns. I can even recognize it, and see it for what it is. I can see the sadness as an emotion that is not me, or even "mine". Yet the pain remains. This is related to the shift I am referring to.


Yes the bodily pain is still here but the suffering is not here. It does not happen to you.

Even my daily mediations have changed. I used to meditate and focus on the breath for 45 minutes, and would occasionally catch "my mind" wandering every now and then. Now, after our dialogue, I feel so many sensations, and observe thoughts come and go constantly during the meditation. These sensations and thoughts don't feel like "mine", and more interestingly, 'I" don't feel like an observer of these sensations. The sensations just ARE. The experience just is.

Great. Take a walk in a park and enjoy what is going on : seeing, hearing, … and see that everything is happening without a you.

Warissem

User avatar
pockets
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:02 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby pockets » Sat Mar 20, 2021 12:32 am

Hi Warissem,
Good, the thought “I ” continue to arise but you do recognize it as a thought.
For my current situation, I would clarify this as "I have the ability to recognize it as a thought, and often can, but this doesn't mean it always happens".

What is missing ?
I do not know exactly, maybe nothing?

What is the difference between thought content and the content of direct experience in the world of the 5 senses and what do they have in common?
The thought content is abstract. I can imagine the sensations, but there is no visceral sensation. This "thought" is still being experienced, and is rich with details, but it is not comparable to the actual physical sensations. In direct experience, the 5 senses feel unique and distinct. Touch vs smell vs site feel categorically distinct, whereas in the contents of thought, site/smell/feel/etc. all feel like its made of the same "stuff".

It needs vigilance : during each activity there is a need to look at the “I” and recognize it as a concept, an illusion.
This happens many times throughout the day in my experience. Sometimes I catch myself recognizing the "i" as a concept... in a conceptual way, as opposed to through direct experience (which I have done many times on accident throughout this dialogue as well). But I am starting to quickly recognize the feeling of the difference.

Yes the bodily pain is still here but the suffering is not here. It does not happen to you.
It is interesting, when it is minor pain, like a scratch, it is very easy to recognize it as sensations that are not mine or happening to me. But when the pain is significant or all-encompassing, it is harder to recognize as merely a concept, and not as "my" pain until after the fact.

Great. Take a walk in a park and enjoy what is going on : seeing, hearing, … and see that everything is happening without a you.
I have been trying to spend as much time each day doing something like this.

Warissem

User avatar
warissem
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 6:45 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby warissem » Sat Mar 20, 2021 12:38 pm

Hi Kevin

Good observations. Here are the final questions. I'll give you a part of them now :

1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? a
Was there ever?

2) Give in your own words what the illusion of separate self is and how it shows up in experience.

3) How does it feel to see this?
What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.

Warissem

User avatar
pockets
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:02 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby pockets » Sun Mar 21, 2021 4:36 pm

Hi Warissem,
1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? a
Was there ever?
There is no separate self. There is no separate anything. There was never a separate self. "Self" was always concepts overlaid on experience.

2) Give in your own words what the illusion of separate self is and how it shows up in experience.
The illusion of separate self is a set of convincing thoughts/labels that paints existence as there being a "me" (my thoughts, my feelings, my emotions, my pain) that exists separately from experience itself.

There is no separate self. The separate self is just a self-perpetuating concept that reinforces itself with thought. The separate self is a concept. The illusion of separate self is also a concept of thought. The illusion of separate self shows up in experience as thought content, as labels, as default responses to experiences. It appears most strongly in experience when the physical sensation is intense (strong pain, strong emotion, etc.). It have been engrained in "me" at a young age and has since reinforced itself as a default response to stimuli.

3) How does it feel to see this? Please report from the past few days.
It feels like it has been here all along and was so "obvious", and simultaneously still feels like it's so easy to "forget". And as soon as it is "remembered" (so to speak), it is obvious that it was never gone.

It feels simultaneously very "easy" because it is just what it is. But it also can feel illusive because it is so engrained in my default mode of thinking, until it is recognized. When it is recognized, it feels relieving -- like "i" am just sinking back into experience.

What is the difference from before you started this dialogue?
Prior to this conversation... I would constantly think and read and analyze and conceptualize about what "no-self" meant. I was convinced I could understand it if I tried hard enough. Through this dialogue, I finally "understood" what people were referring to when they said that it is not something you can "think through" or "learn". It is something that is always there, but for so long I could not see it clearly. There is nothing to "get", but it is simultaneously so hard to explain to others. It needs to be experienced.

From this dialogue (specifically being repeatedly called out for giving answers not through my direct experience :) ), I was able to see that my approach of understanding was not helping "me" see my experience clearly and without labels and thoughts.

I am very grateful for your patience, exercises, and questions,

User avatar
warissem
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 6:45 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby warissem » Sun Mar 21, 2021 6:46 pm

Hi Kevin

There is a need for clarifications :

This is a part of your answer to question 2) :
The separate self is just a self-perpetuating concept that reinforces itself with thought.
Can a concept “separate self” reinforce itself with thought ?

It feels like it has been here all along and was so "obvious",


A big YES;

and simultaneously still feels like it's so easy to "forget". And as soon as it is "remembered" (so to speak), it is obvious that it was never gone.


Who or what is forgetting or remembering ? What is reading these words is not obscured when there are thoughts. Sunshine is not obscured by the clouds, sunshine shines on the clouds.

It feels simultaneously very "easy" because it is just what it is. But it also can feel illusive because it is so engrained in my default mode of thinking, until it is recognized. When it is recognized, it feels relieving -- like "i" am just sinking back into experience.
The old mode of being won’t go in a finger click.

Warissem

User avatar
pockets
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:02 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby pockets » Mon Mar 22, 2021 5:11 am

Hi Warissem,
The separate self is just a self-perpetuating concept that reinforces itself with thought.
Can a concept “separate self” reinforce itself with thought ?
The concept of a separate self cannot reinforce itself. The concept of a separate self cannot /do/ anything. What I meant by this statement is that the separate self (or the illusion) is perpetuated by continued (likely unconscious) acknowledgment of the separate self as existing.

and simultaneously still feels like it's so easy to "forget". And as soon as it is "remembered" (so to speak), it is obvious that it was never gone.
Who or what is forgetting or remembering ? What is reading these words is not obscured when there are thoughts. Sunshine is not obscured by the clouds, sunshine shines on the clouds.
The only "one" forgetting is also a concept. When I try to describe this "knowing", it also becomes a concept because even words/thoughts/attempts to describe are adding labels/concepts to experience. The "knowing" itself is always there. I don't know what else even could be there, it is all there really is. I have had no "experience" that is not this, because it is experience.

When I try to describe forgetting, I just mean leaving this "mode" of active recognition vs the "old" mold.

Thank you for helping clarify,
Kevin

User avatar
pockets
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:02 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby pockets » Mon Mar 22, 2021 5:21 am

There is loneliness. It does not feel like the thought/emotion of loneliness that I have experienced before, it doesn't "feel" like an emotion at all, and it doesn't feel like it is happening to "me". It just feels very empty.

User avatar
warissem
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 6:45 pm

Re: Conceptual Understanding vs Experiential Knowing

Postby warissem » Mon Mar 22, 2021 2:32 pm

Hi Kevin

The clarifications about the questions are fine.
There is loneliness. It does not feel like the thought/emotion of loneliness that I have experienced before, it doesn't "feel" like an emotion at all, and it doesn't feel like it is happening to "me". It just feels very empty.
Can you call this "peace" instead of loneliness ? It is empty of thoughts but it is full of presence knowing.

Now i'll give you the next questions :

4) What was the last bit that pushed you over; made you look?

5) a) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work?
Give examples from your own recent experiences to how things happen and how things work.

b) What are you responsible for? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how this works.

6) Anything to add?

Warissem


Return to “ARCHIVES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 254 guests