The object seen in the mirror is simply an object in the mirror being experienced.
It's a human form, man and an Asian. It's an image. The image is not the object, it is just the reflection of assumed object; it's assumed because there is no way to verify.Could you describe that "object" in the mirror, without just saying it's an object, or an experience?
What is this "object" in the mirror? Would you elaborate?
Although I'm still not sure what exactly "more plain, worldly way" way means, let me try again with my best!Could you describe it in a more plain, worldly way?
He wears a white t-shirts with a print on.
He is a person named "Sky".What or who is "he" in the above sentence?
When another person stands there, the key difference is that I can see their eyes in the mirror and outside of the mirror at the same time while Sky's eyes only available from mirror.What is it that differentiates this "he" from other "objects" that are reflected in the mirror?
He is a person named "Sky".
When another person stands there, the key difference is that I can see their eyes in the mirror and outside of the mirror at the same time while Sky's eyes only available from mirror.
Also, when I touch the objects in the mirror, I see the touching sense on hand and touching image in mirror. For Sky, there is additional sense on face being touched.
"He" only exists in a thought, or called label. Without the label, there is no ground "He" can stand.Without the label “Sky” or “person,” what is “He”?
In my memory as a thought. That's it.Where are the “Sky’s eyes” right now?
"Ownership" does NOT exist. It's illusion. I said it's Sky's eye as communication tool to differentiate the eye on the face from the eyes on another face and the towel in the mirror image. However, if you ask whether it's owned by Sky, I cannot say yes or no. Because the question bases on the assumption that there is ownership, which I'm clear that "ownership" does not exist and there is no "Sky" that can own anything.Are they owned by Sky?
Yes, it's a face because there is a thought saying it's face.Please touch your face now. Is it a face?
My answer is same as the one for "Are they owned by Sky". There is no ownership and there is no "me" that can own anything.Is that face yours?
There is no one who feels. Rather, there is a thought saying "there is Sky who feels the touch" or "I feel the touch". "There is one who feel the touch" is part of the experience (as a thought), rather than there is one who feel or experience or thought.Also, who is feeling that sense of touch?
"He" only exists in a thought, or called label. Without the label, there is no ground "He" can stand.
Yes, it's a face because there is a thought saying it's face.
Nothing.Without using the label “he,” could you tell what is reflected in the mirror?
Nothing.If there is no thought about it, what is it?
That exists in Experience as thought. So, there is nothing to talk about or point to without using the label "he" or thought.What do you mean by nothing?
Would you elaborate?
I see myself and try to remove a white hair. I see white hairs in the mirror and try to remove one. Somehow it's so hard to grab one because the direction is 180 degree different and it seems my brain is not used to move like that. Hard, but slowly pulled the hair successfully. There is smiled face looking down the hair on the hand.Again, could you say something about what is reflected in the mirror?
Actually I have 5 years old child, so I'm so familiar. First of all, there is nothing to discuss with the child.According to your experiential understanding of reality, how would you convey that to, say, a 5-year-old child?
With conversation with the previous guide Mathew, the term came up to point what actually is here and now including everything.Oh, and also, could you say something about what you call "Experience"?
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 177 guests
