And what would this experience that you are waiting for look and feel like?To be honest, from the very first time I read these statements they are kind of empty to me. They do not mean anything. I could try to conclude what they point to. It means that experience is everything and there is nothing detached from it. It is however 'dry' conclusion, there's no experience of it.Experience is not derived from people and things. People and things are derived from experience.
What does the word ‘experience’ mean to you?This sentence has exactly the same meaning as the previous one. It shows as well, that there is not independent thinker.2. Thought appears that ‘tell stories’, and thoughts appearance is not thought, but experience itself showing up as thought.
I asked you not to read stuff while we were doing this exploration because it can be counterproductive to the exploration. Not only do Ilona and I guide differently, but I am trying to get you to LOOK so that you get those ‘aha’ moments for yourself from looking. If you had been able to ‘get it’ from reading, you would have already gotten it. Having an intellectual understanding is good, but it’s the ‘aha’ moments, the moment when it is felt that symbolises recognition of what is being understood intellectually. Please refrain from reading stuff while we are doing this exploration.Today, again, I've been reading Ilona's blog. The conversations she's had with other people. LOOKING at some questions she's posed and practicing it. SEEING that an "I" doesn't exist. It is a thought. It doesn't even last. It appears and disappears. How could something that is impermanent be a person? The 'I' screams that it is a doer. It monopolises 'own' part of experience creating illusion that there is someone who's in charge.
What are you referring to as ‘experience’? What experience are you talking about? It sounds to me you are referring to the experience of a person – the doings of a person who is living life (ie working, eating, sleeping, laughing, crying) and that that person is waiting for some sort of experience that says they are not a person.
For a person to become enlightened it would first need to be aware. Yet if you look right now, you'll see that there is zero evidence of people being aware.
Are you a person that is aware or are you simply aware? Do you perceive the world via a body and mind, or are the world, body and mind simply known to you? If it's clear that you are not a person that is aware, it should also be clear that "other people" aren't either, and that the world, body and mind, or shall we say "experience", is known by you in its entirety right here and now.
You that are aware of experience couldn't possibly be more enlightened or awake than you are now. People that seem to be aware are but appearances in and as experience, and are no more aware than the appearance of a rock or a sound are.
And to take this a step further, where is the line that separates you from experience? If you look right now, can you find a "you" that is separate from experience? Or is there only experience, which is the knowing of itself?
I asked you to contemplate the fact that experience, which is thoughtsoundtastesmellcoloursensation is not derived from people and things, but people and things are derived from experience. Your response was that experience is dry! This is all there is. THIS is IT…there is nothing more. There is no other experience or experiences, but somehow, it seems, you are still waiting on some sort of experience, whether it be a change in state by becoming blissful or somehow integrating with everything and becoming one, or somehow you disappear and something mystical takes it place or something. Whatever this moment is…IS IT. There is nothing more.
Colour IS an appearance, and an "appearance" is just another word for THIS (or 'experience') exactly as it is.
Thought IS an appearance, and an "appearance" is just another word for THIS (or 'experience') exactly as it is.
Sound IS an appearance, and an "appearance" is just another word for THIS (or 'experience') exactly as it is.
Smell IS an appearance, and an "appearance" is just another word for THIS (or 'experience') exactly as it is.
Taste IS an appearance, and an "appearance" is just another word for THIS (or 'experience') exactly as it is.
Sensation IS an appearance, and an "appearance" is just another word for THIS (or 'experience') exactly as it is.
Yes, it might be clear, but you still think there is a doer. So, it’s not clear at all. Also, you are looking at thought as if it is a separate object, but thought is experience appearing as thought…and when you contemplate that, it’s quite an amazing phenomenon.Thought is so slow and shallow. When I'm at work doing various activities at the same time, it is so clear that thought wouldn't be able to do all of that. It wouldn't be able to comprehend those actions. Especially when thinking is completely somewhere else concerned with something else. It's so clear that thought is not a doer.
This exploration is not about seeing what you are, but is about seeing what you are not. It’s seeing how the mechanisms of an “I” are held in place. That is all this exploration is about. It is an entirely different exploration into seeing what you are, although it is touched upon throughout this exploration.
Love, Kay
xx

