Returning for another shot

All threads where seeing happens are stored here. The complete list, sorted by guide, contains all links. The archives include threads of those that came to LU already seeing as well.
You are welcome to continue your conversation with your guide here after your name is turned blue.
User avatar
marknathan
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby marknathan » Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:42 pm

Don’t worry, we’re not there yet….
You can say that again :-)
Foot' points to these beautifully-shaped ends of our legs. Our actual experience of sensation there arises, and the thought 'foot' jumps in automatically. So while the label points to something which physically exists,

You describe this well, and this is probably beyond the scope of this inquiry, and I may be slow in understanding…. but if sensation + thought-label 'foot', is how foot arises, how are you defining physical? Or, if all you can find is sensation + thought-label +thought-story + mental-image (or sight-image), where is physical? Where is foot – outside of thought?
I mean that the thing that 'foot' points to exists outside of thought. The content of the thought 'foot' is not real, but it points to something real, though the label is limiting and is an arbitrary definition. Not sure if I'm making myself any clearer. Perhaps I'm on the wrong track.
one thought arises in dependence on another

this can be a useful way of modelling – in dependence on the wind, the feather is blown across the path – but is it seen this too is modelling. What says this, other than thought?
Yes, a thought says this. But a thought also says “there is no 'I'”. But you're not saying it isn't necessarily true, but rather that is not the immediate experience? I think I can see that. It's a thought which arises with the content “this is happening because something else happened before that.” In immediate experience, there is just one though after another, seemingly coming out of nowhere.
Their flow can be slowed when the attention is absorbed in something, as in meditation

Can be slowed? Or slows? Is there an author of the slowing? Is there an agency that controls the slowing?
Slows, absolutely. Can slow. There is no author of the slowing. No agency, no doer.
Look closely. Are thoughts aware? Can one thought know another? Can thoughts do anything at all? When we say ‘thought says’, we imply an agency… is it really so?
No, they're not. It's odd though, isn't it? Where does understanding come from? Thoughts seem to be the articulation of understanding (or misunderstanding), after the fact. Understanding happens, and then the thought arises, “I understand!”

User avatar
Aragon
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:03 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby Aragon » Mon Jan 11, 2016 8:04 pm

Hi Mark...

Is no-agency, no-doership, seen, or something you just say because you think it's right?

Aragon
... dancing in the ebb and flow of attention, more present than the breath, I find the origins of my illusions.... - Nirmala

User avatar
marknathan
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby marknathan » Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:06 pm

Well there's the million dollar question. There are a lot of preconceptions about what "seeing" should feel like. On the basis of those, the experiences of my friends and people I've heard talk about it, I would say no. Having said that, I cannot find an 'I', and it seems much simpler now. Certainly far less esoteric than I was expecting. There is seeing, hearing, smelling, there are felt sensations and thoughts. That's all there seems to be.
The feeling that I exist is still there though. The feeling of a someone. But it kind of falls apart when looked at closely.

User avatar
Aragon
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:03 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby Aragon » Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:24 pm

Hi Mark,
Well there's the million dollar question. There are a lot of preconceptions about what "seeing" should feel like. On the basis of those, the experiences of my friends and people I've heard talk about it, I would say no.
- You mean it is not seen?
Having said that, I cannot find an 'I', and it seems much simpler now. Certainly far less esoteric than I was expecting.
- Sounds about right
There is seeing, hearing, smelling, there are felt sensations and thoughts. That's all there seems to be.
- (+ tasting) seems to be, or is?
The feeling that I exist is still there though. The feeling of a someone. But it kind of falls apart when looked at closely.
- Sounds about right. We're not talking non-existence here. It's just seeing what is. Something IS, no?

Notice: The sun rises and falls. Trees grow and die. The wind blows the leaves across the path. A squirrel climbs a tree. Are you separate from this, from life? Or is that just a thought? You move, go to the loo when you need a pee, the fridge when you are hungry, bed when tired.

What says you are different? What says you are separate?

Notice the hands as they wash your hair, the feet as they manouvre rugged ground, the arms and legs as they drive the car.

Does life show up effortlessly, or is it all orchestrated by a 'you'?

Observe....

It isn't going to be some paradise. It is just seen as it is. Yes, the feeling (+label + thought) of being a person shows up, but is the story seen? The sense of separateness still shows up, but it is seen for what it is....

You were into Buddhism no? See how the fetters beyond self still imply self? This is freeing but it is just the start. Self-ing still happens.

What is uncertain now?

Aragon
... dancing in the ebb and flow of attention, more present than the breath, I find the origins of my illusions.... - Nirmala

User avatar
marknathan
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby marknathan » Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:46 pm

Well there's the million dollar question. There are a lot of preconceptions about what "seeing" should feel like. On the basis of those, the experiences of my friends and people I've heard talk about it, I would say no.
- You mean it is not seen?
I'm not sure, Aragon. I mean, I can't see an 'I'. All the exercises we've done, the reflection I've done, the questions I've asked, and I can't find a self. I think I see there is no self. I say I “think” because there is some doubt – I doubt that I've seen through it because of expectations of what seeing would be like. Expectations, I know.
There's a quiet joy. I go through the day, I get annoyed by things, but I must admit that, for the time being at least, I don't seem to be as perturbed. And I seem to be able to sort of “tune in” to that knowledge, and there's a peace. But is it knowledge or just another bloody belief? And if I even have to ask that question then surely it isn't really seen?
There is seeing, hearing, smelling, there are felt sensations and thoughts. That's all there seems to be.
- (+ tasting) seems to be, or is?
That's all that I can find. There is understanding too. Understanding arises, followed by a thought. So where does understanding fit into it: seeing, hearing, tasting, feeling, thinking. Understanding? Is understanding a thought?
The feeling that I exist is still there though. The feeling of a someone. But it kind of falls apart when looked at closely.
- Sounds about right. We're not talking non-existence here. It's just seeing what is. Something IS, no?
Yes, something is.
Notice: The sun rises and falls. Trees grow and die. The wind blows the leaves across the path. A squirrel climbs a tree. Are you separate from this, from life? Or is that just a thought? You move, go to the loo when you need a pee, the fridge when you are hungry, bed when tired.

What says you are different? What says you are separate?

Notice the hands as they wash your hair, the feet as they manouvre rugged ground, the arms and legs as they drive the car.

Does life show up effortlessly, or is it all orchestrated by a 'you'?
There is no orchestration. Just arising. It's very mysterious. Perhaps I just want to understand it, to get my head around the mechanism of it all. Seeing through the illusion of 'I' doesn't provide those answers though, does it?
It isn't going to be some paradise. It is just seen as it is. Yes, the feeling (+label + thought) of being a person shows up, but is the story seen? The sense of separateness still shows up, but it is seen for what it is....

You were into Buddhism no? See how the fetters beyond self still imply self? This is freeing but it is just the start. Self-ing still happens.

What is uncertain now?
Yes, I swotted up on the fetters around the time I first heard of LU, and was surprised by how much there is to go after self is seen through. It's only the beginning, as you said. And it made breaking the first fetter seem much more possible.

What is uncertain now? I suppose what I wrote at the top of this post. On one level I feel certain there is no 'I'. I'm just afraid it might be an intellectual understanding. The LAST thing I want is yet another belief; I'm done with those. It should simply be known when seeing has happened, shouldn't it?

User avatar
Aragon
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:03 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby Aragon » Tue Jan 12, 2016 11:17 pm

Hi Mark,

Doubt arises. What is doubt (in actual experience)?

You can sit with this a while. You can raise anything you'd like. Or I can give you the final questions and see what comes out of those...

It's entirely up to you.

You decide ;-)

Aragon.
... dancing in the ebb and flow of attention, more present than the breath, I find the origins of my illusions.... - Nirmala

User avatar
marknathan
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby marknathan » Wed Jan 13, 2016 12:00 am

Thanks Aragon. I'll sit with doubt and check in again tomorrow.
Thanks again for your patience.
Mark

User avatar
marknathan
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby marknathan » Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:34 pm

Hi Aragon,
So, what is doubt? A thought. Mental images and stories about other people's experiences, and thoughts like "it's not like that for me", "shouldn't it be more like this, or that?"
The thing is, if I'd never heard of their stories, if I'd never been a Buddhist and didn't have all that expectation baggage, if there was just this conversation and the question, 'is it seen?', the answer would be yes.
Those comparing thoughts arise, doubt arises, but there's no "I". There's sensation in the body, and the thought "me", but it's just a thought, with a mental image and a story of "my" past.
It seems to be a gradual settling, like the establishment of the habit of seeing, if that makes sense. Sitting is more of a joy than it has been in years - thoughts and distractions arise, and it's ok, it's just part of the flow; there's no "me" at the centre, struggling to meditate. There's just what is.
What do you think?

User avatar
Aragon
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:03 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby Aragon » Thu Jan 14, 2016 12:53 am

Hi Mark,

Sounds nice :-)

Shall we do the final questions? It might help clarify....

Aragon
... dancing in the ebb and flow of attention, more present than the breath, I find the origins of my illusions.... - Nirmala

User avatar
Aragon
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:03 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby Aragon » Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:55 am

P.S. you know there is nothing to fear. If you're not there, you're not there. If you are, you are. There are, many groups and forums after this dialogue. It does not end here. The questions just might bring clarity. Something does seem to have changed for you. But you can wait if that feels right for you....
... dancing in the ebb and flow of attention, more present than the breath, I find the origins of my illusions.... - Nirmala

User avatar
marknathan
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby marknathan » Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:54 pm

Hi Aragon,
Thanks for that. As you say, there's nothing to fear, either way. If you think it might be useful, let's try the questions.
Mark

User avatar
Aragon
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:03 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby Aragon » Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:20 am

Hi Mark,

Okay, let's do it!

There is no hurry. Write what feels true. Please number (and quote) the answers with the corresponding numbers. You don't need to answer them all at once. Let's see where this takes us:

1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?

2) Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience. Describe it fully as you see it now.

3) How does it feel to see this? What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.

4) What was the last bit that pushed you over, made you look?

5) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? What are you responsible for? Please give examples from recent experience.

6) Anything to add?

Be well,

Aragon
... dancing in the ebb and flow of attention, more present than the breath, I find the origins of my illusions.... - Nirmala

User avatar
Aragon
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:03 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby Aragon » Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:15 pm

Everything okay Mark? Not rushing you, just checking!
... dancing in the ebb and flow of attention, more present than the breath, I find the origins of my illusions.... - Nirmala

User avatar
marknathan
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby marknathan » Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:27 pm

Hi Aragon,
Thanks for checking up :-) I've been sitting with the questions for the weekend, letting them roll around, like loose shot on deck.I'd like to tell you what's been going on, before I answer them, if that's ok.
We talked a little about doubt.It still comes up, and it's hard to ignore. What it comes down to is that I'm not sure I feel any different. I mean, something's different. But different enough to say seeing has happened? So "selfing" continues. The thought 'I' arises. Some of the time I catch it, and maybe for a few moments can tune into that perspective - no separate self. But then I don't feel particularly connected to the world, to the flow of life, doubt arises around that. I feel I can see, logically, that there is no 'I', but that the belief is still held. When I went to type up my answers to those final questions, I felt disingenuous; I kind of know what the answers should be, and it's genuinely hard for me to tell the difference between writing what I think is right, and writing what I really believe is right.
Then at other times, including now to a certain degree, I think "no, there really is no separate self; I can see that." Maybe it's a little harder than I expected to get past the expectations. I've been searching since I was 18. I was a Buddhist for 8 years or so. The thought arises, "Me? A stream entrant?!" Followed by,"No, there is no me to be a stream entrant." I'm going a little crazy here :-)
I read in the LU Enlightening Quotes app that it's not uncommon to get stuck at the gate intellectualising. Resistance? Avoidance? I'm not interested in attainments or joining a club - I need to be sure. Am I being stupid?

User avatar
marknathan
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:18 pm

Re: Returning for another shot

Postby marknathan » Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:28 pm

Basically, how does one know if seeing has really happened?
Thanks Aragon.


Return to “ARCHIVES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 151 guests