Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

All threads where seeing happens are stored here. The complete list, sorted by guide, contains all links. The archives include threads of those that came to LU already seeing as well.
You are welcome to continue your conversation with your guide here after your name is turned blue.
User avatar
Usha
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:32 pm
Location: Shoalhaven,NSW Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Usha » Thu Nov 06, 2014 11:55 am

Dear Vivien,
OK, let’s go back to the belief in the soul. Please examine and look for this supposed ‘soul’ from every possible angle. Look everywhere. Don’t leave any stone unturned. Find it! If it really does exist, you have to be able to find it!
Soul is just another name tag for 'I', to preserve an individualistic existence. But its seen that its one of the many stories that arise in thoughts .This story is very cleverly constructed to create and preserve 'I' and to provide explaination to all events happening to this 'I' by weaving another story of Karma through it. Nothing is really found when looked but belief in this story is what created an illusion of reality of soul and karma. All these stories are regularly seen in thoughts and heard from other people who believe in it. But 'BELIEF' is the key word and if that's lost, these stories are just seen for what they are - STORIES.
Direct experience is not confirming to any of these stories!! 'I' , 'Soul' and 'God' nothing is found in reality. All that is is just momentary experiences threaded together by memory...causes to events seem so only when thoughts are believed! Thoughts are constantly popping about everything and when that is observed,its quite comical :)

Love
Usha

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Vivien » Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:47 am

Dear Usha,
Direct experience is not confirming to any of these stories!! 'I' , 'Soul' and 'God' nothing is found in reality. All that is is just momentary experiences threaded together by memory...causes to events seem so only when thoughts are believed! Thoughts are constantly popping about everything and when that is observed,its quite comical :)
Very good looking dear Usha :)

OK, let’s examine the senses now.

Seeing
Currently there are words on the screen being read. Go to the actual experience itself, and ignore the suggestion of thoughts.
What reads these words?
Is there anything that is reading, or reading is just happening?


Look around in the room. Go to the actual experience itself, and ignore the suggestion of thoughts.
What sees?
Is there a seer somewhere, or there is just seeing happening?


Hearing
Pay attention for the background sounds. Go to the actual experience itself, and ignore the suggestions of thoughts.
Does a hearer arise in the actual experience?
Is there somewhere a hearer, of just hearing happening?


Smelling
Smell something, an orange, coffee or the hand.
In the fragrance that arises, is there any direct evidence that there is a smeller (or a nose) that is doing the smelling, or is there only smelling?

Of course, thoughts and mental images suggest ‘explanations’, but when they are examined closely, are they really the case?


Love, Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Usha
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:32 pm
Location: Shoalhaven,NSW Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Usha » Fri Nov 07, 2014 12:32 pm

Dear Vivien,
What reads these words?
Is there anything that is reading, or reading is just happening?
Reading is happening, meaning of the words is suggested by a thought, believing that meaning is suggested by another thought and reader is not experienced at all but taken for granted that its always present (which is seen as a deep set belief when looked)
What sees?
Is there a seer somewhere, or there is just seeing happening?
Again seeing is happening, of everything from physical body to other items, and simultaneously labelling is happening by thoughts but if thoughts are not believed or just noticed as they arise, then seeing and labelling are clearly seen as separated experiences and not connected to each other. Seeing is one happening and thought of the seer arising is another happening.
Does a hearer arise in the actual experience?
Is there somewhere a hearer, of just hearing happening?
Hearer is not perceived in actual experience, hearing happens just like seeing. Then thoughts label sounds coming from different objects and then thoughts arise to prove that this is heard by the body , so body moves away from the source of the sound , hearing stops happening. But all these are series of happening s that’s experienced and not clouding the first experience of hearing.
In the fragrance that arises, is there any direct evidence that there is a smeller (or a nose) that is doing the smelling, or is there only smelling?
Only smelling, fragrance is labelled but can’t be seen! Nose is suggested by a thought but can’t be smelled :)
Of course, thoughts and mental images suggest ‘explanations’, but when they are examined closely, are they really the case?
Experiencing is continuously happening , non-stop and with this thoughts are popping up to reinforce the self in experiencing and ‘better’ the experiencing , this is seen when looked but when not looking or paying attention to the thoughts , believing in it happens without realization. But sometimes neither believing happens, nor looking, the task is so all consuming that no seer or seen is actually labelled by the thought. Many hours of the day are like that for ‘me’, just tasking !!

Love
Usha

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Vivien » Fri Nov 07, 2014 10:17 pm

Dear Usha,

You did a very good looking :)

Let’s investigate the body now.

With the eyes closed, sitting still, notice the other 4 sensations: hearing, smelling, tasting, touching. With only the input from the remaining four senses, and without relying on thoughts or mental images:

Can it be known how tall the body is?
Does it have a weight or a volume of the body?

Is there a boundary between the body and the clothing?
Is there a boundary between the body and the chair?

In the actual experience does the body have a shape or a form?

Is there an inside or outside?
What is the body in the actual experience?


Love, Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Usha
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:32 pm
Location: Shoalhaven,NSW Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Usha » Sat Nov 08, 2014 2:02 pm

Dear Vivien,
Can it be known how tall the body is?
Does it have a weight or a volume of the body?
Definitely not! Unless you believe the thought that comes up as you ask the question when sitting with eyes closed, it can’t be known.
Is there a boundary between the body and the clothing?
This gets a bit tricky because the sense of touch that is felt on the clothing is different than the sense of touch on the body but then its seen that a memory is formed of the first sense of touch and then a thought appears comparing the second sense of touch with the first and suggesting that this is the body being touched. But if there is no movement then boundary between clothing and body is not even suggested by thought.
Is there a boundary between the body and the chair?
Again tricky as sensation of touching the carpet appears and a thought appears of a body sitting on the carpet but without the thought or seeing the thought as a thought makes it clear that boundary is not felt in direct experience. Direct experience is only of a sensation of pressure/ softness/ warmth.
In the actual experience does the body have a shape or a form?
Definitely not! Shape or form is just a memory thought appearing when shape or form question is asked keeping the eyes closed.
Is there an inside or outside?
No! A sound of a passing car arises, an itch arises, coffee aroma arises, tingling in the legs felt but inside and outside doesn’t arise. Boundary of experience is not felt at all!! The thoughts make that suggestion but the words lose their meaning if the context is not there, if no reference point (body) is believed that is suggested by another thought, then inside and outside is seen as a meaningless thought.
What is the body in the actual experience?
Eyes opened and body is seen in clear view. Also seen is the thought labelling the seeing as the body. But then I look around and I see other forms and recognise with thoughts and labelling happens and then other bodies and more labelling .. But this doesn’t answer your question.
I don’t know what body is in actual experience. What is it? It seems like a mixture of various sensations.

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Vivien » Sun Nov 09, 2014 12:50 am

Dear Usha,
Again tricky as sensation of touching the carpet appears and a thought appears of a body sitting on the carpet but without the thought or seeing the thought as a thought makes it clear that boundary is not felt in direct experience. Direct experience is only of a sensation of pressure/ softness/ warmth.
Good looking :) Let’s dig a bit deeper here…

In the actual experience is there really a sensation of pressure/softness/warm, or there is only pure sensation with simultaneously arising mental labels ‘pressure’, ‘softness’, ‘warmth’?

Eyes opened and body is seen in clear view. Also seen is the thought labelling the seeing as the body. But then I look around and I see other forms and recognise with thoughts and labelling happens and then other bodies and more labelling .. But this doesn’t answer your question.
I don’t know what body is in actual experience. What is it? It seems like a mixture of various sensations.
So when the eyes are open, the body emerges only, because the mental label ‘body’ is attached to the sight. In the actual experience there is no body seen, there is only patch of colouring that is labelled as ‘body’. So as soon as the label is ‘applied’ the body emerges. Can you see this?

Do you remember your first email to me about the body, pain and others? I’d like to deeply investigate the body with you if you’d like to do so.

Just consider…
Look in the mirror. See the image that is called ‘body’.

Was the ‘body’ that is seen in the mirror the one that was born on a certain date?
Or is the ‘body’ that is being seen in the mirror, different to the ‘body’ that was born on a certain date?

Other than this thought, how else is it known that the ‘body’ was born on that specific date?
Or is the thought the only link?
And because that thought is believed in, it is said to be 'reality', but is it really?

However, all it is just a thought appearing that is believed in?
Can you see this?

Can you see that “This body was born on xxxx” is simply a thought appearing that is believed in, and nothing more than that?

So, can this body have a past?
Or everything that is labelled as ‘past’ is just a mental story?
Other than contents of thought stories, is there a ‘past’?
Can time be experienced?


Love, Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Usha
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:32 pm
Location: Shoalhaven,NSW Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Usha » Sun Nov 09, 2014 6:14 am

Dear Vivien,
In the actual experience is there really a sensation of pressure/softness/warm, or there is only pure sensation with simultaneously arising mental labels ‘pressure’, ‘softness’, ‘warmth’?
Yes true , just pure sensation :)
So when the eyes are open, the body emerges only, because the mental label ‘body’ is attached to the sight. In the actual experience there is no body seen, there is only patch of colouring that is labelled as ‘body’. So as soon as the label is ‘applied’ the body emerges. Can you see this?
Yes !
Was the ‘body’ that is seen in the mirror the one that was born on a certain date?
No. I don’t remember the body that was born as I never saw it! I remember vaguely a body of 8-9 yr old in the mirror and its very different from this image that I see in the mirror now.
Or is the ‘body’ that is being seen in the mirror, different to the ‘body’ that was born on a certain date?
Yes completely different when comparison thought is believed.
Other than this thought, how else is it known that the ‘body’ was born on that specific date?
Or is the thought the only link?
And because that thought is believed in, it is said to be 'reality', but is it really?
Its not even a thought that is believed but the information given by the parents that is believed that this body was born on this date. Reality /facts of the body is seen as acquired knowledge and not something that was present instinctively. So is this really true? Well in this world of appearances its true , isn’t it? Like ‘reality’ of this ‘world’ is seen as not objective reality but experiential reality but in this experience , the image and story of body exists and this is how it is, isn’t it?
Can you see that “This body was born on xxxx” is simply a thought appearing that is believed in, and nothing more than that?
There is no memory of direct experience of being born, but there is a memory of my mum that had the direct experience of me being born and that is believed. So its not just a thought that is believed. But in saying that, I see that at this stage that memory is just a thought that arises when the question of being born is asked and its believed but it was a direct experience at one time and so it can’t be denied that it did not ever happen.
So, can this body have a past?
Or everything that is labelled as ‘past’ is just a mental story?
Other than contents of thought stories, is there a ‘past’?
Past is seen as content of thought stories but that thought is not just an arising thought but a memory thought that gets triggered for specific questions. So not just any story but a story based on a memory of an event that was directly experienced.
Can time be experienced?
Not directly, it’s a mental concept. Its derived from the memory thought, so in other words its content of thoughts. But time seem to have an effect on things as it ages everything, it seems to change the body. How does that happen if its just a thought? Thoughts are not supposed to cause anything to happen. But in saying that aging is also experienced in thought because only when comparison is made between the current and past moment, aging is confirmed by thought and its believed because the visual seeing confirms it ! so is this called experiencing time??
I am confused!!!

Love
Usha

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Vivien » Mon Nov 10, 2014 7:52 am

Dear Usha,
There is no memory of direct experience of being born, but there is a memory of my mum that had the direct experience of me being born and that is believed. So its not just a thought that is believed. But in saying that, I see that at this stage that memory is just a thought that arises when the question of being born is asked and its believed but it was a direct experience at one time and so it can’t be denied that it did not ever happen.
How is it known that your mom had a direct experience of you being born?

For her, this is just a memory, which is nothing more than the content of an arising thought in this moment.

“It was a direct experience at one time and so it can’t be denied that it did not ever happen.” – How is this known that it was a direct experience at one time?

Past is seen as content of thought stories but that thought is not just an arising thought but a memory thought that gets triggered for specific questions. So not just any story but a story based on a memory of an event that was directly experienced.
Yes, past is just the content of a thought. But how is it known that this is not just a story?
How memory is experienced?
How is it known that a memory of an event was ever been experienced?
What is a memory if not the content of arising thoughts?

But time seem to have an effect on things as it ages everything, it seems to change the body.
Really? Time is an objective entity outside of current experiencing?
Can time do anything or have an effect or anything? Look closely.


When I look into the mirror and I say that I look older than 10 years ago, what happens then exactly? There is an image in the mirror. A thought says that image is ‘me’. It says that there is a link between that image in the mirror and the felt sensations in the body. But is there really? Is there any other link than a thought?


After, when it is concluded and believed that that image and the current sensations are linked and labelled as ‘me’, another mental image arises, with a thoughts subtitle: “this was me 10 years ago”. So we have 2 mental concepts (and images) and they are compared by thoughts with a conclusion: “I got older.”
so is this called experiencing time??
Look closely, don’t consult thoughts.

Can time be experienced at all?

Love, Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Usha
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:32 pm
Location: Shoalhaven,NSW Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Usha » Mon Nov 10, 2014 12:08 pm

Dear Vivien,
How is it known that your mom had a direct experience of you being born?
By memory which is seen as the content of thought.
Yes, past is just the content of a thought. But how is it known that this is not just a story?
How memory is experienced?
By thought.
How is it known that a memory of an event was ever been experienced?
What is a memory if not the content of arising thoughts?
Nothing. Memory is a thought and that is clear. It’s an image of a past event but it exists only as a thought, nothing else.
Really? Time is an objective entity outside of current experiencing?
Certainly not!
When I look into the mirror and I say that I look older than 10 years ago, what happens then exactly? There is an image in the mirror. A thought says that image is ‘me’. It says that there is a link between that image in the mirror and the felt sensations in the body. But is there really? Is there any other link than a thought?
Yes, the link is just an arising thought.
Can time be experienced at all?
No. Time is a concept of the mind which creates the illusion of past , present and future.
But in direct experience, only the present or Now exists. I have never experienced past or future!! But I keep believing it but when looking closely its clearly seen that the believing is actually the belief in the content of arising thoughts which are also in the Present.
Time can’t be experienced directly, so its existence is just the content of an arising thought.
Memory is another thought that creates an illusion of time but again its also just the content of an arising thought ! But hanging on to it happens especially the sweet memories because its gives us so much pleasure and seems like a part of our identity but when the self is seen as non-existent then hanging on to is just seen as a conditioned response .

Love
Usha

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Vivien » Tue Nov 11, 2014 3:02 am

Dear Usha,
Time is a concept of the mind which creates the illusion of past , present and future.
But in direct experience, only the present or Now exists.
Yes. But can you see that ‘present’ or ‘now’ is just another mental label attached to what IS?
Memory is another thought that creates an illusion of time but again its also just the content of an arising thought ! But hanging on to it happens especially the sweet memories because its gives us so much pleasure and seems like a part of our identity but when the self is seen as non-existent then hanging on to is just seen as a conditioned response .
Very good observations.

Previously, you had interest in others, so let’s examine them now.

What are others in the actual experience?
Are there others independently from ‘my’ interpretation?


Next time when you talk to someone you can observe this:

There is a sound (voice of the other) and a sight that is labelled as the 'other body'.

But, is there any link between the sound and the sight, meaning that the sound is coming from that sight (the other) or only thoughts and mental constructs link them?

--

Would you like to further deconstruct the body, or would you like to stop here?
Is there anything you would like to address or examine?


Love, Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Usha
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:32 pm
Location: Shoalhaven,NSW Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Usha » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:33 am

Dear Vivien,
Yes. But can you see that ‘present’ or ‘now’ is just another mental label attached to what IS?
Yes. Present /Now whatever , its just a name given to what always is. I can see that the cycle of time that we always thought ourselves to be in doesn’t exist outside of our thoughts. We are not progressing towards the future, its just the illusion of thoughts that makes it seem so.
What are others in the actual experience?
Are there others independently from ‘my’ interpretation?
Mental labelling of others happen very subtly, hard to see that its happening. All the senses are so fully immersed in the experience that its hard to see that others are in my experience and not independent of ‘me’. Its easier to see when observing a sea of people in a shopping center but when actually interacting with a person, its hard to overcome the deep belief of a separate ‘me’ and a separate ‘other’. But in saying that a knowing is present now of what the reality is, though the seeing and labelling of bodies happen.
But, is there any link between the sound and the sight, meaning that the sound is coming from that sight (the other) or only thoughts and mental constructs link them?
Linking of sound and sight is a mental trick and not a reality and its best exploited by the Ventriloquist who entertain us with this trick. The thoughts come up instantly linking sights and sounds and if the sight is not seen then other thoughts suggesting the source of sound comes up which is either believed or not and the same with smells and sights. Same with touch and sight, all sensation gets linked to the sight as thoughts are conditioned to instantly label the source of sensation and sight is used to confirm the source. I always wonder how it works for people who don’t have sight, how do their thoughts confirm the source of sensations, may be some other way.

So yes the labelling of source is a conditioned response that always happens with thoughts and no actual link exists that can be seen or felt by any senses. Like if I am blindfolded and listening to two different people sitting next to each other, I can’t say who is speaking unless I have a memory of their voice ( which is a thought) or see their lips moving ( so thought linking the movement of lips to the sound is believed).
Would you like to further deconstruct the body, or would you like to stop here?
Deconstruction of body has happened when its seen that body is mental label given to a sight of combination of variations in color and movement , then thoughts separating the body in different parts and labelling them. Its an experience that is labelled as my body and ‘me’ is seen as a ghost that doesn’t exist in reality. And because its seen that ‘me’ doesn’t exist, its understood that ‘they’ don’t exist as well!
Is there anything you would like to address or examine?
Nothing at this stage :) I am just letting this discovery sink in and color all my experiences from now on. Now it’s a matter of playing a game of seeing this ‘me’ rise up for different things and seeing it disappear in to nothingness as soon as its recognized ;)

Thanks a million times for your beautiful presence and guidance in this journey of finding a 'ghost self'.
Looking forward to meeting you in person someday :)

Lots of love
Usha

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Vivien » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:42 am

Dear Usha,

Your depth of seeing is beautiful :)
Thanks a million times for your beautiful presence and guidance in this journey of finding a 'ghost self'. Looking forward to meeting you in person someday :)
You’re more than welcome, dear Usha. I’m also looking forward to meeting you in ‘real’ live :)

Would you be so kind for answering the final six questions again? After answering them, I’ll share the response is with other guides. They may or may not have further questions.

Once it is confirmed by other guides that seeing through the illusion of the self has happened, our conversation in this thread will come to an end, however you won’t be left alone. There is a whole community of others on FB, who have also seen through the ‘self’. Actually, there are several groups to join.

So here are the questions. Please answer as clearly as possible and with as much detail as needed. Don’t forget to add everyday examples from your experience for question 5.


1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?

2) Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience. Describe it fully as you see it now.

3) How does it feel to see this? What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.

4) What was the last bit that pushed you over, made you look?

5) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? What are you responsible for? Give examples from experience.

6) Anything to add?


Love, Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Usha
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:32 pm
Location: Shoalhaven,NSW Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Usha » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:35 pm

Dear Vivien,
Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?
No there was never a separate self in reality but it was imagined, it was a belief in a thought. It arises as a thought with different situations, sometimes its seen straight away and sometimes belief in it happens for some time and uncomfortable feelings arise and then those feelings help to recognise that ‘I ‘ thought as the root of discomfort.
) Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience. Describe it fully as you see it now.
Self is created by a belief in the existence of a world prior to ‘me’. The belief in this model of the world reinforces the existence of separate selves and objects and how an independent self is to be protected from others and nurtured with love. On behalf of this ‘Self’ everything is done, everything is felt , everything is sought for or feared. This also leads to the fear of death and desire for more as the independent self is limited in time and space. This illusion is fool proof as every phenomena is explained through this model and the ‘others’ that are perceived confirm to all the beliefs. Some questions that still remained unanswered are answered by the blanket rule of Karma that applies to every living being. Also to keep this ‘Self’ alive forever, its referred to as the ‘Soul’ so that the body dies but the ‘Soul’ continues forever in different bodies. So then the motivation is provided to do good deeds and be born in better circumstances and so all the preferences for doing good is also seen as based on the fear of suffering later in some other life if its not done. This whole illusion creates a way of life that is restricted with the bondage of Karma and the only way out is salvation ‘of’ this ‘individual self’. Again this model never strives for salvation ‘from’ this ‘individual self’.
How does it feel to see this? What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.
To actually SEE this as just a belief is like having a weight of a mountain lifted off from the shoulders!! When I started this dialogue I believed strongly that 'I' as a soul intended to achieve ‘my’ salvation in this birth so I get free from the cycles of birth and death and then there is some pure heaven where souls rest forever without inhabiting a body. I also strongly believed in good karmas and to not hurt anyone as otherwise this goal of my life will never be fulfilled. So I can see it clearly that it was all very ‘self’ driven though the ‘self’ was seen as a soul and not a body.
But over the course of this dialogue and contemplating on the knowledge of ‘no self’ and how this belief deeply colors all the experiences and then finally seeing the whole model of world fall apart when the belief of a separate self is seen as just an arising thought with no existence in reality, this itself is seen as liberation/ salvation that ‘I’ was striving for!!
What was the last bit that pushed you over, made you look?
The first time ‘I’ as a separate self came in to questioning, after reading the first interview in the Gate crashers book. That started the process but over the course of this discussion and being hammered about the belief in content of thoughts actually made the seeing possible that the ideas about self and questions relating to it were just the content of thoughts and nothing more.
It’s just so easy to keep looping in to the thought circle until unless the person guiding is not getting in to your loop of thoughts but pulling you out by constantly pointing out that ‘you’ are still spilling out the contents of thoughts and not actually concentrating in the actual experience of being.
The Darth Vader example is also a good one :) when taken in deeply, it was at that point the realization happened that person or object in thought is not real but an image! Its simple when I see it now that very easily the content of thought is believed to be actually ‘real’ and that belief is not even realized as belief. It’s then the realization happened that the belief of ‘me’ sitting on the chair typing this is also just an image in the mind which is nothing more than the content of an arising thought.
Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? What are you responsible for? Give examples from experience.
Decision and intention is clearly seen as thoughts that reinforce the belief of a separate ‘self’. Free will, choice and control are all the aspects and functions of the separate self that is believed to exist somewhere inside the body. When the illusion of ‘self’ is seen through careful scrutiny, it is then seen that things happen spontaneously but closely followed by an ‘I’ thought. So there is no ‘separate self’ responsible for anything. All there is, is experiencing of happenings arising in Awareness and of course all the words used to describe this process are labels used to explain it as best it can be explained and none of the labels are actually the facts.
So the smallest task of waking up in the morning can be seen that there is no ‘self’ ordering the body to wake up. And when Seeing the complex task of interacting with some other body, its seen that there is no ‘self’ that can be found that orders the eyes to make eye contact and simultaneously orders the tongue to speak words while directing the mind to form the sentences. Its just seen as experiencing of the sight, sounds, thoughts and movement happening simultaneously. Words are seen as sounds then interpreted by the thoughts and that interpretation is believed.
Anything to add?
Gratitude towards ‘everyone’ involved in this process of providing a platform where the ‘self’ is welcomed and systematically dissected in to nothing :) and the clear ‘Awareness’ or ‘Spaciousness’ opened up to infuse the life that is now going to be lived in oneness.

Thank you with lots of love
Usha

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Guide Available - Let's Have a Look, Shall We?

Postby Vivien » Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:43 am

Dear Usha,

I'm happy to say that the guides are satisfied that you have seen through the illusion of a separate self and none of them has any further questions.

I'm sending you a private message, so please check your inbox.

Love, Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/


Return to “ARCHIVES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 8 guests