when notions of 'I' or the thought 'I' or 'I' arises this is a thought self, an imaginary notion, not real, not actually existing.
CHECK it! Can you locate a 'self'
in reality?
experience has no inherent meaning.
Check it! Breathing happens. And it means that...??? Walking happens. And it means that...?
Ok, now I can see that the story written by the imaginary me provides meaning for that imaginary me. The experience that is given meaning by the story is inherently meaningless, ie without meaning.
Exactly.
So "existence" is 'everything' that is not me, the imaginary label.... And that/this 'everything' is just happening, appearing, flowing.... This is rather a cool experience here.
Yeah—it's a pretty cool experience here, too.
CHECK it! Everything
real continues to exist when you stop thinking about it; label 'me' disappears when you stop sustaining it.
thought real, content of thought imaginary; ie, real/imaginary or territory/map.
There is some difficulty here with this real/imaginary divide. Sometimes it seems here that 'everything' is in mind, and not in my mind in the sense of a person's mind. In other words 'the world' is all imaginary.
No worries. This is due to the way
perception works. All of your perception takes place in mind, so in a sense everything
is imaginary. Here's how neuroscience explains it:
You have an experience, a sensation, a stimulus. Data about the stimulus are sent to the brain, but
before being processed the data are
massaged by one's perception, or frame of reference, which is made of all one's memories of similar stimuli and their
meanings. [Has this stimulus happened before? Yes/no. To the same part of the body? Yes/no. While in the same location on the earth? Yes/no. What happened when this stimulus happened before? Is it dangerous?]
Then the massaged data get sent for processing. End result: you never actually experience the stimulus
directly; everything you experience has been filtered through a frame of reference, and is thus 'imaginary'.
What do you fear would happen without a 'me'?
The fear here is that things will not get done, meals cooked, house and garden maintained, etc; that no one will 'look out' for me. Things are already starting to 'slip' here as I age. I see that I am actually not going to be able to do this maintenance at some stage in the future.
Things are getting done without 'you' all the time! Look! Most of the time we operate "on automatic pilot".
Is a 'self' required to cook and garden? A little Graham who sends memos to the body, telling the legs how to bend and stretch, fast- and slow-twitch fibres to extend and flex, feet to strike the ground, hands to grasp the rake or shovel or whisk or saucepan...all these get done
automatically and then thought attaches an "I" to it. Cooking happens, Gardening happens, and then an "I did it" gets tacked on at the end. Check it!
I see that I am actually not going to be able to do this maintenance at some stage in the future
In what future? What you
see is a projected
image of some imaginary time when what happens automatically will not. But there
is no future; there is only This Moment Now. The one in which you are breathing. The one before the "I" gets run over by a bus or falls off a mountain.
I see that all this is in mind only and that life will go on now and now and now.
Indeed. And without your assistance or direction!
this fear can be the experience here - however now I know it is an experience only, experienced by no one.
Fear can be experienced; it is a thought. But the content of the thought, the imagined future of incapability, is imaginary. It exists
only in imagination.
When fear arises, stare it in the eye. Fear is a protective mechanism; ask it what it's
protecting. It doesn't need to protect a 'self'; there is no self requiring protection.
Ok, have been noting this noticing or looking, and it is rather wonderful. Experiencing just coming and going being noted by no one.
It is rather wonderful. How's it going today?
Last night, in bed, attention was moving from a headache to a stomach ache to a pain in my side, to one in my leg;
It is interesting to notice that wherever one shifts one's focus,
that is experienced! For example. i was riding the stationary bicycle at the gym. Suddenly i looked down and focused on my feet, pedaling. Before that moment, i had no experience of feet; with the shift in focus, BOOM! Feet!!!
then attention sort of 'spread' so that 'everything' was only one sensation and it was not an ache or a pain, merely a 'sensation' or 'experience', an experience not experienced by anyone - rather wonderful
Yes. There is sensation; until we describe it in thought, it is merely an experience. 'Pain' is just another label we tack on to an experience.
It's fun to take this walk with you!