Good morning BF,
Yes, would definitely say have seen through the illusion of a separate self.
Excellent.
On the surface, that is what LU is about, however when somebody like yourself turns up, i like to check if there is any other identification happening.
If you're not a Self, what are you ? (a soul ?, awareness ?, etc ?)
"Would you settle for the recognition that a belief was about to become operative?"
Not sure exactly what this question means. Please elaborate more.
Yes, what i was meaning was that the beliefs that are operating are conditioned, and (probably) won't stop instantly.
The road to their dissolution, is awareness. When you recognize that a belief has been/is/about to become operative, that conditioning is weakened.
"then how has everything happened?"
This question was; "If there is no Self, running the show, then how did everything happen (that needed to happen for things to be the way they are.)
The body is a visible, material object, not a lasting object, as the nature of it is to age and as everyone knows dies.
This is (probably good) conjecture.
Remove the mental processes that were involved in you coming up with this statement, and what is left ? (don't use mind to do this. LOOK for what exists
before thoughts arrive to explain/describe/categorize.
What is the mind, probably just a label we use, like an umbrella type term to cover mental processes.
Yes, just as "body" is an umbrella term for the mental construct of limbs and trunk and head, etc, being assembled in a particular way.
Think of your right big toe.
Now, keep thinking of your toe, and think of your nose.
Were you able to think of both at the same time ? ..or was there quick oscillations between them ?
If you are aware of your toe, then you can add the concept that this belongs to a concept called "body".
Now if you are aware of your nose, and call that part of a body, you only have memory of the toe.
Sure you can add the memory to the bigger concept, but when we have the all of the bits together in the concept called "body", there is still a lot of bits that we don't experience. (how do you know that there is a kidney in there?)
So "body" is a useful story, but at an expriential level, it doesn't exist.
What are your thoughts on this ?
Okay, now, how could the reality be that all that exists is sensation?
From the perspective of the body/mind organism, is there anything else except sensation and thought ? ..anything else at all ?
So the fact of a thought is 'real'. There is no question that a thought occurred ? What gives that thought existence is concept. Story. Thoughts are ALWAYS about something. Right ? They are never the thing itself. They always
refer to something.
The senses are the input to the body (ha, convenient concept) and in this light i would include mind as a sense input.
For all practical purposes, we respond to thoughts, just as we respond to input to the other senses.
Stimulated Senses = Sensations.
The organism experiences sensations, and concept. Can you think of anything else ?
Is this a round about way of stating nothing exists INDEPEDENTLY?
If you grok the above pointing, then you have to come to the conclusion, that this cannot be known. It's still in the grab bag i call 'the great mystery'.
Have you experienced experiencing without the overlay of thought ?
Try this; take an object sitting on your desk and put it where you can see it clearly.
Now just look and watch both the input from your visual sense, and watch what thoughts do.
Don't focus sharply on either until things quieten down, then intensify the acuity of the visual sense while withdrawing focus on what thoughts are happening. Eventually just aware of the existence of thoughts without any need to know what they are about. Looking... Seeing, as if for the very first time...
Report your memory of experiencing.
love
vince