Hey Divya,
This is still a bit tricky. I spent a bit of time looking at this. The attention is moving from one place to another place – that is clear. Sometimes focus is on thoughts, sometimes on feelings, sensations, it seems to move slower or faster. It seems to identify or not …It also seems like something sees this. I am not sure what that is , knowing now that is not “I – thought”. There is still an impression that IT is not always present, especially when the attention identifies with thoughts, feelings or sensation, experience etc. However, while doing this investigation in slow motions, I can see that my previous statement is illogical because Something sees identifications too so it is always there. It is very interesting. I would like to explore this further if have another pointers to IT.
You can keep looking at this until this becomes clearer. Anything we look at here doesn't have a 'time limit' on it :).Yes, thoughts seem to veil IT but do they really? When thoughts aren't there you don't exist? When feelings aren't there you're not either? When there is sensations you're not present?
When sitting and looking, there will be looking happening all by itself, or the same with the additional sense/idea that "Divya is looking". Simply see that idea for what it is. Not to push it away. Just to see it clearly as an idea, an assumption, of a "Divya", for so long, seemingly at the centre of experience - and now, there's a growing seeing that life does not need an "intermediary", as "person" to do, think, act, eat, walk, breathe."
Go with the noticing aspect for now. Confusion comes when we try and work it out rather than just see it.
This truth expressed in your words has become factual to me. I have been investigating “this entity – I/ME for a while and I can’t find it. I investigated how “I – subject” function without “I thought” and life seems to go on with its challenges and enjoyment, giving an impression that it doesn’t need “ME thought” to unfold. Things are done or not done but it seems like they don’t depend on “ME – subject”. There is still a slight bizarreness in this experience and I won’t be able to give a confident answer of who I am because truly I don’t know. I feel aliveness so I assume I must exist in some way, ha, ha...
Yes life just flows as it will without the "ME thought". It's quite beautiful :) and great that this has been noticed. Maybe the bizarreness is because it feels like a different way of looking at things although this is how it has always been.
The standard view of 'I', 'me' is that of a person - A body with a mind.
The standard view is that 'I' refers to this body that appears here in awareness. I am this body. Also 'I' have control over this body.
Since 'I' am this body, 'I' see, 'I' hear, 'I' feel etc - I perform all the senses.
This body was born - It will live a number of years - And then it (I) will die.
Feel free to reject what I have suggested if they don't match what you currently believe yourself to be
Currently, would it be fair to say that you believe that currently you are a person sitting in a chair, looking at a computer screen and reading words off it right now?
What does the word 'I' point to?
What makes this body ‘yours’?
What makes this body ‘you’?
This is also a bit tricky/unclear. There is noticing, like seeing, thinking, feeling, experiencing , etc but it feels like there is something else because that “something” can see it. Does this “something else” come only from the mind? The true answer is I don't know .
Ok lets look at the senses for a start.
Seeing
Currently there are words on the screen being read. Go to the actual experience itself, and ignore the suggestion of thoughts.
What reads these words?
Is there anything that is reading, or reading is just happening?
Look around in the room. Go to the actual experience itself, and ignore the suggestion of thoughts.
What sees?
Is there a seer somewhere, or there is just seeing happening?
Hearing
Pay attention for the background sounds. Go to the actual experience itself, and ignore the suggestions of thoughts.
Does a hearer arise in the actual experience?
Is there somewhere a hearer, of just hearing happening?
Smelling
Smell something, an orange, coffee or the hand.
In the fragrance that arises, is there any direct evidence that there is a smeller (or a nose) that is doing the smelling, or is there only smelling?
Touching
With eyes closed, put one of the hands onto the table. Pay attention only to the pure sensation.
Does the pure sensation itself suggest in any way that the hand is doing the touching?
Does the pure sensation itself suggest in any way that there is a hand (subject) that touching the table (object), or is there only touching?
When all mental images and thoughts are ignored is there a ‘hand’ or a ‘table’ at all, or is there only touching (pure sensation)?
Of course, thoughts and mental images suggest ‘explanations’, but when they are examined closely, are they really the case?
This spots my confusion which I expressed in my previous fragment. It feels like experience is flow of life, movement with many different flavours, doesn’t have a purpose or meaning, it is unpredictable. Knowing feels like awareness of these experiences. I am not sure about my last sentences as it may came form the mind which tries to put a meaning to experiences.
You're onto something with that first sentence :) Experience is flow of live, a movement with many flavours with no purpose or meaning, unpredictable. Could it be possible that experience and knowing are one and the same? Are you aware of this sentence?
Observe this:
Say out loud the word ‘I’ several times. At the same time try to trace back where the word ‘I’ point to. Try to localise where is the ‘I’ exactly.
You can observe that whenever the word ‘I’ is said or even thought about the focus of attention goes automatically to the bodily sensations (usually somewhere to the upper body or head or both). So there is a direct, automatic association between the word ‘I’ and the felt sensations in the body.
So the word ‘I’ and the bodily sensations are welded together, creating the SENSE of ‘me’. The ‘sense’ part is coming from the felt sensations, and ‘me’ part is coming as a thought. When this is not seen, BOOM! The illusion of ‘me’ is created. Can you see this?
So, can the ‘I’ be found in the actual experience other than a thought?
Yes, I am looking at this. I want to look at this over next week or longer as I want to go through different states and see how much I am buying into the thoughts that accompany my experience. At the moment if feels like most of the time there is a story attached to experiences.
Ok, yeah definitely keep looking :) Just remember that you're not aiming to maintain a certain state or experience :)
I am glad that this expectation has been challenged within me. I can see that expectation is another illusion or any projections of the future outcome is only an obstacle of true seeing. I can see that any experience is actually unknown and it is only the mind that attaches an interpretation of it.
Excellent that will really help LOOKING :) and I would add that all experience is known but it doesn't require any input from thoughts to BE <3
Yes, I am not English so please ask if something is unclear or misspelled.
Ok :) I understood what you were saying. I just like to ask a question to be clear what's being said
So, if I experience a self as “don’t know”, it is because it can’t be found? It can appear as a thought but it seems not to be its true expression as it is true expression is unknowable and unfound? I am putting these in questions as I want to contemplate it. It feels like a movement is taking place. It basically feels deep and moving … not sure how else to express it. It is a penetrating movement.
It can be hard to put into words, I get that, I really do :). I would love to hear the answers to those questions you've just asked to contemplate. The answer doesn't come from thoughts.
Yes, that is clear. I can only say that feelings of deep appreciation are appearing right now.
thank you Tanya,
<3 <3 <3 Thank you also for some excellent looking.
Love Tanya