Thanks, Brenda.
Even when I have read in many places that the " I " doesn't exist, I must admit this is not real in my experience, I don't feel it that way. You asked me to talk only from experience and to be honest.
Yes, hence this investigation. Don't take anything you read here, or anywhere, for granted. Explore it for yourself, in the immediacy of the experience of the present moment. Explore and investigate ruthlessly, until you see for yourself what is actually the case. What has always been the case.
In any honest investigation, one never starts with the answer already formulated. So keep an open mind. Should you find that there is an actual self running the show, living this life, then so be it. What I would like to guide you towards is a clear, direct and unambiguous
seeing that there is no self at all. None. Zero. Without a shadow of a doubt. Anything other than that is just another theory, another worthless piece of speculation.
So, this is not about me convincing you of anything. My only job is to point your attention in the right direction. You will have to look and do the math yourself.
It's really, really, ridiculously simple, like I mentioned earlier.
So simple, that the mind will not accept it.
this self or I is who lives the experience, the experience of my life, who learns, relates to others, has a story, a past, makes something well or makes a mistake, enjoys or suffer, and lives overwhelmed with concepts, ideas, judgements.
So much material to work with here, Brenda. Wonderful!
So many entrance points for inquiry.
You've listed a couple of aspects of the self, of the I:
The experiencer.
The learner.
The relater.
The owner of stories.
The maker of mistakes.
The enjoyer.
The sufferer.
The thinker.
Let's examine this a bit closer.
Are these one and the same entity? The one experiencing, learning, relating, thinking, etc?
You've described what the self appears to be doing, but if you look more closely, is this actually the case?
Let's begin with the experience of thinking. It is normal to say "I am thinking about chocolate" or "My thoughts are about chocolate", etc. In these types of assertions, what seems to be said is that there is a thought occuring and that thought is generated by or belongs to a discreet entity, me, I, the self.
Right?
Now, if you examine closely, attentively, the
actual experience of a thought occuring, what do you notice?
Where do thoughts come from? Do you create them?
Where do thoughts occur? Where does a thought happen?
Can you control your next thought?
Where is the thinker of thoughts actually located?
What is the thinker of thoughts?
In what way, shape and form does the thinker exist?
Etc.
I hope you're getting a feel for the type of questions I'd like you to ask here. Let me know if anything's unclear.
I resist to this idea, If there is no I, who is having the experience?
Good! Resist the idea as much as possible.
Then resist it some more.
Watch where this resistence comes from.
Where it happens.
What form it takes, what it feels like.
What is being protected by this resistance?
What needs protection?
This isn't about ideas at all.
It's about reality. Reality that is not a concept or idea- but ACTUAL, REAL REALITY!
Good luck with the investigation and keep me posted...!