I have been thinking about your first three questions and by thinking I mean talking in my head about them in words and sometimes using images. I am mentioning this because I doubt if this is the direct experience.
Of course, direct experience
includes thinking, but cannot be reduced to it. Liberation does not come as a thought. This isn't about getting a correct image or thought, but in directly and clearlys seeing the reality of the non-existence of a self. That seeing of course informs thought and the conceptual, but it is a non-conceptual, visceral knowing that we are pointing to here.
My initial attempt at defining I was that it is the mind/body that is typing this message right now. However, on further reflection the mind/body existed probably before there was an I. I is a construct that arises from the need to differentiate among many.
Yes. This, and your wonderful doll story make it clear that you have a good conceptual grasp of the construction of the identity of separation. That's a good first step, but it's not what we are pointing to here. We're aiming to ascertain, for ourselves, in the intimate experience of the present moment, whether or not it is
actually the case that there is no self. At all. Anywhere. In any way.
Why do you use plural for I?
Because your choice of language suggests several selves. A self that has a self. A self that has an identity. A self that wants to loosen the hold on that identity. That is the crux of the illusion.
My first assumption was that "I" should be located somewhere behind my eyes as that's a major area of perception but being in the present moment, there is nothing which could be pointed out as I.
Stay with this sensation for a bit. Examine it fully, completely. Can you describe it in more detail? What makes the sensation in this area feel like it is YOU? What is its EXACT location? Its shape, size, substance?
I am trying... What I experience in this moment is breathing, physical sensations, thoughts and gap between thoughts accompanied by a feeling of anxiety. I wonder if the anxiety is there because I have read other people's experiences that fear accompanies reflecting on these questions. However, I wasn't expecting it consciously. It came out of the blue.
Some anxiety is to be expected in this examinaton, because we are questioning deep-seated assumptions about the fundamentals of experience. Can you allow these uncomfortable feelings to be completely present, while continuing the inquiry?
I couldn't see what you were getting at before working on your questions. Reading it now, still not sure. Do you mean that since there is no I that there is nothing for it to loose it's hold on?
If you were to see what I was getting at here, we would be done, so that makes sense.
I am here to loosen up my hold on this identity of separation
The insight that this forum was built to help people arrive at consists of a fundamental shift in the perception of experience, a shift that will instantly make clear why this sentence is profoundly meaningless (please note that I'm just using your sentence as an example- it's a perfect example of the confusion at the heart of language and hence our thinking and living).
So, you have described in vivid detail the process by which an identity is formed, making it clear that the "identity of separation" is a learned construct, a set of behavioral habits. Yes?
Now I'd like to shift our attention to the other side of the equation. The one that is able to HAVE or NOT HAVE an identity.
What is that I?