Looking for the self
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2026 4:17 am
LU is focused guiding for seeing there is no real, inherent 'self' - what do you understand by this?
I understand that the self is just a concept. The gross I is thoughts, history, likes/dislikes, feelings, the stories one tells oneself, name, form.
What are you looking for at LU?
Support from someone who has walked this. My own looking has carried me a long way alone, but I feel I'm venturing into territory where a second set of eyes will be needed, someone to test what I take to be seen, catch anything I've missed or subtly held onto, and keep me honest at the thresholds I'm now approaching.
What do you expect from a guided conversation?
I've inquired independently for years without a teacher. The search for a self has already come up empty in direct looking, and I'm not seeking an introduction to the idea — I'm seeking a guide to test what I take to be seen, catch anything I've missed or subtly reified, and hold me to direct experience rather than description.
What is your experience in terms of spiritual practices, seeking and inquiry?
My orientation came through direct experience rather than study. A near-death experience around 2000 seeded the recognition, and over roughly 15 years of self-directed inquiry I searched for the 'I' and found none — the belief in a self feels irreversibly gone, though a self-sense still arises. I've never followed a teacher; I later found my recognitions corroborated in Advaita, Madhyamaka, and Zen rather than sourced from them. My practice now centers on direct looking and inquiry — working with huàtóu-style questioning, examining the seam between bare sensation and narrative identity, and sitting with the threshold where the sense of a chooser dissolves. I've engaged Angelo DiLullo's work on the emotional body and shadow material, which keeps me honest about what's cleared versus what's merely quiet.
On a scale from 1 to 10, how willing are you to question any currently held beliefs about 'self?
11
I understand that the self is just a concept. The gross I is thoughts, history, likes/dislikes, feelings, the stories one tells oneself, name, form.
What are you looking for at LU?
Support from someone who has walked this. My own looking has carried me a long way alone, but I feel I'm venturing into territory where a second set of eyes will be needed, someone to test what I take to be seen, catch anything I've missed or subtly held onto, and keep me honest at the thresholds I'm now approaching.
What do you expect from a guided conversation?
I've inquired independently for years without a teacher. The search for a self has already come up empty in direct looking, and I'm not seeking an introduction to the idea — I'm seeking a guide to test what I take to be seen, catch anything I've missed or subtly reified, and hold me to direct experience rather than description.
What is your experience in terms of spiritual practices, seeking and inquiry?
My orientation came through direct experience rather than study. A near-death experience around 2000 seeded the recognition, and over roughly 15 years of self-directed inquiry I searched for the 'I' and found none — the belief in a self feels irreversibly gone, though a self-sense still arises. I've never followed a teacher; I later found my recognitions corroborated in Advaita, Madhyamaka, and Zen rather than sourced from them. My practice now centers on direct looking and inquiry — working with huàtóu-style questioning, examining the seam between bare sensation and narrative identity, and sitting with the threshold where the sense of a chooser dissolves. I've engaged Angelo DiLullo's work on the emotional body and shadow material, which keeps me honest about what's cleared versus what's merely quiet.
On a scale from 1 to 10, how willing are you to question any currently held beliefs about 'self?
11