Earlier, when "Empty Mirror" chimed in on this thread, I interpreted Awareness as a "post liberation" by-product.
Where as the definition states states both..Yes, "Empty Mirror" has seen this No-Self for a while, Yet each individual communicates this differently...His expression of this, was unique in itself...
Sorry about that Cam. I can see that I may have caused confusion by using a different approach to you. I liken this (difference in pointing) to two people pointing at the same moon from different positions. They'd have to be standing in the exact same spot for the pointing to be exactly the same.
You are pointing to the lack of a personal "I", and I was doing the same, but in a different way.
Just to clear up any confusion for you Noobstrom, here is how the "knowing" that I spoke of points away from a personal "I".
In what follows I'm occasionally going to use the word "You" with a capital "Y", and when I do I will not be referring to the person you imagine yourself to be, I will be referring to awareness, or "aware beingness".
If you take a very close look at the sense of "being" (the sense of existence), and if you take a very close look at "knowing", you will find that the two of them are the same thing, and they are not 'in' any person.
Thought has confused this "knowing beingness" (or "aliveness" or "aware beingness") with the body-mind that appears in this "aware beingness". In so doing it "person-alises" all experience, and in so doing "manufactures" a personal "I".
This personalisation of experience is the source of suffering. The experience itself
is not the source of suffering, no matter what the experience is.
Once it becomes clear what You truly are (or what "this" truly is - same thing), the suffering ceases because the personalisation is seen through.
This entire universe, with it's whole 14 billion year history has only ever existed in/as You. It has absolutely no existence outside of You, and nothing ever could exist outside of You.
You are what appears, what it appears in, and what knows of the appearance. You are "this".....
all of it. You're not a person appearing in it.
At the moment you are confusing the "aliveness" (or "aware beingness"), that you know yourself to be, with a "person" appearing/arising in this "aware beingness".
I hope that this helps you see that Cam and I were pointing to the same lack of a personal "I".
Apologies again to both of you for any confusion that I may have caused.