It’s not anything separate, it’s just being-ness. There is a sense of something being aware of the experience. It’s just part of what “is”.And where is this experiencer? Please describe the experiencer.
Direct looking doesn’t find evidence of a self. But there still seems to be something sticky or stubborn, something that just doesn’t “get it”Are you ready to accept the answers?
Is "being-ness" the experiencer? Is being-ness an experiencer or an experience?It’s not anything separate, it’s just being-ness.
EVERYTHING is a part of what is. What did you mean by that? Could you explain, please?It’s just part of what “is”.
This "sticky or stubborn" thing... is it a feeling, or a group of feelings? Or thoughts? Or both? Or is it something else?Direct looking doesn’t find evidence of a self. But there still seems to be something sticky or stubborn, something that just doesn’t “get it”
The seen - a table or object can be seen - this is trueThe seer,
the seeing,
the seen.
Which of these do you see to be true?
If the seer is a sensation, what is it that is witness to the sensation?Then the idea pops up, if this seer is the sensation, then it's being seen. The seer being seen then feels like another construct or concept.
1-An experience in the body of no self. - A passive experience.It feels like bouncing back and forth between an experience in the body of no self and of getting into my head and thinking about it
Examine this. Is there a thing that hangs on? Find it's location(s) and expression(s).The thing that hangs on feels like doubt, thoughts that say "your not really getting it".
It just happens like everything else.nd of getting into my head and thinking about it... Is this passive or active? That is to say, is it happening by itself, or are you making it happen/responsible for it?
oh yes, this is just another thought :)Is there a thing that hangs on? Find it's location(s) and expression(s).
When looking for something that is cognizant of that phrase, again there is nothing found but sensations.To whom or what is the phrase "you're not really getting it", being directed? Also, what is cognizant of the phrase
There is suffering.There is nothing found that is controlling an outcome, but all of that doesn't relieve suffering.
Is this a problem? For who?There is attachment to outcomes and disappointment and wanting experiences to be different.
Does this desire arise of it's own accord? Automatically?But then again there is a desire for some experiences to be other than what they are.
But WHAT is suffering?
It's a problem in that it feels awful in the body, it's a problem for the ego, for the feeler of the feelings.Is this a problem? For who?
This sticky collection of feelings is attached to an outcome that will feel better.What is attached to what?
Attachment is not a feeling, there is resistance to the way it is and the resistance feels like a heaviness and a tightness in the chest and it feels like heaviness around my eyes and forehead, as though the brain is tired and hurts.What does attachment feel like? Can you locate the experience and observe and describe it?
The desire or thoughts arise and there is just a heavy feeling in the chestDoes this desire arise of it's own accord? Automatically?
It's feelings and sensations in the body that feel awful that don't want to be felt..Who or what is this a problem for?
"What" as in what could be suffering?
It's a problem in that it feels awful in the body, it's a problem for the ego, for the feeler of the feelings.
This sticky collection of feelings is attached to an outcome that will feel better.
Attachment is not a feeling, there is resistance to the way it is and the resistance feels like a heaviness and a tightness in the chest and it feels like heaviness around my eyes and forehead, as though the brain is tired and hurts.
It's feelings and sensations in the body that feel awful that don't want to be felt..
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Semrush [Bot] and 2 guests
