Got to the point during meditation earlier that the “I” or center has to be a thought as well.
Yes!
The recognition that the “I” is a thought, a movement, just another arising, is IT. But then the mind steps in and says, “If ‘I’ is just a thought, then am I nothing but a thought?”—which is just another thought! And there was an attachment to following it. See how slippery this is?
Circling back to our previous investigation:
Where do thoughts come from? Where do they go to? Is there any way to control which thought comes next? To only think certain thoughts? Is there a thinker anywhere to be found?
I watched with intent of being without thought. What if there is no thought, would this sensation go? Which of course are thoughts. I sat. Felt a lot of energy.
Yes. The energy, the experience remains.
It is impossible to get rid of thoughts, the arising of thoughts are part of direct experience. It is the content of the thought that is not direct experience. A thought about “I” may as well be a thought about “unicorn in galoshes.”
Without a thought, there’s no me to an extent.
To an extent? To what extent? Where is the sense of self without a thought referring to a sense of self?
But, something knows something
Do you see the trick? That’s another thought trying to re-establish a knower. Instead of accepting raw experience, the mind is desperately trying to put a “someone” back in control. Drop that assumption.
“I” am something that can observe, be aware of thoughts and sensations
Is that true? Or is it just another thought claiming ownership?
Look right now—without referring to memory, without relying on thought—can you actually find an observer?! Or is there just observing happening?
If you say, “I am aware of thoughts and sensations,” pause. Is there an actual, separate “I” doing the awareness, or is there just awareness happening?
See the trick? The mind is trying to smuggle in a separate entity—a watcher, a knower. But when you really look, all that can be found is the raw happening of experience. No owner. No observer. Just this, as it is.
Sit with this. Look again. Report back—what do you actually find?
can I even not seek?
Who is asking this? Seeking is only needed if something is missing. Is anything missing in this moment when you aren’t referring to thought?
You’re on the edge of something REAL here. Don’t let the mind pull you back into abstraction. When you repeat the investigation, go slower, look deeper. See if there’s truly an entity there—or just thoughts claiming ownership of experience. Keep reporting back.