Re: Thanks for existing
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:36 am
Hello Jerry
It may seem pedantic but it's not. It so subtly leaves a trail of beliefs that are so easy to miss
Now we will take this matter further of thought being the reporter and not the controller
Sports Exercise
Please note that you will have to check the link when using this exercise, to make sure it is still viable, as sometimes they are removed from Youtube.
The following link is a short clip of a football game. You may not be be familiar with this particular sport so If you prefer another sport…please feel free to find one to do this exercise with.
The important thing here is to do your best in watching how thoughts behave.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooZLYNQOqk4
(Here is an alternative
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPn3x7c9WFA)
1. Watch one minute with the sound turned OFF, watching ‘people’ messing about with a leather thing on a field, up and down, up and down. Let it sink in, the whole experience.
2. Once the first minute is completed, now watch another whole minute with the commentary turned ON.
Notice the differences. Are there any differences between 1 and 2 which are immediately obvious?
Notice how the commentator / the reporter (thought) offers lots of know-how, even advice. It seems to feel as though they know exactly what is being experienced out on the field. It even feels that they could influence, somehow, what is going on, as though one outcome is much preferred to the opposite outcome. The commentary may seem to heighten any supporter feelings which are there, and call for an identification with one team or other, and with the importance of the game itself. Also notice how the commentator peppers the commentary with personal interpretations.
3. Now turn the volume OFF AGAIN and just watch the action with NO audible commentary, the shapes moving around on the screen etc. Again notice all the differences in what is appearing as experience.
4. Now turn the volume ON again and ignore what you think you know thought is talking about, and just notice it as sound.
Is the commentary on the football game a necessity for the play to happen?
Does what the commentator says affect the game in any way?
Does the commentator accurately describe EVERYTHING that is actually happening?
Is the commentary totally in synch with what is actually happening as it happens or is it actually lagging? (its ABOUT something in the PAST, something not happening right NOW )
What effect does the commentary have – is it helpful in any way, is it relaxing, is it difficult to keep up with, is it a distraction from what is actually happening?
And in the same way, is the inner narration of thought a necessity for the play of life to happen?
Does anything in particular about the internal narrator stand out when doing this exercise?
Alan
Yes, that's the truth !The separate self is only found in thought.
Very good. Realizing memories are only thought is crucial ! Only one other thing to point out..It’s saying it controls experience, and it summons memories of it controlling experience, which was one of the main disruptions until I just realized those memories are also thoughts. A lot of the feelings of it controlling experience came from those two things.
Did it control experience or did it THINK it controlled experience.it summons memories of it controlling experience.
It may seem pedantic but it's not. It so subtly leaves a trail of beliefs that are so easy to miss
Please do !Will let you know if that changes.
Now we will take this matter further of thought being the reporter and not the controller
Sports Exercise
Please note that you will have to check the link when using this exercise, to make sure it is still viable, as sometimes they are removed from Youtube.
The following link is a short clip of a football game. You may not be be familiar with this particular sport so If you prefer another sport…please feel free to find one to do this exercise with.
The important thing here is to do your best in watching how thoughts behave.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooZLYNQOqk4
(Here is an alternative
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPn3x7c9WFA)
1. Watch one minute with the sound turned OFF, watching ‘people’ messing about with a leather thing on a field, up and down, up and down. Let it sink in, the whole experience.
2. Once the first minute is completed, now watch another whole minute with the commentary turned ON.
Notice the differences. Are there any differences between 1 and 2 which are immediately obvious?
Notice how the commentator / the reporter (thought) offers lots of know-how, even advice. It seems to feel as though they know exactly what is being experienced out on the field. It even feels that they could influence, somehow, what is going on, as though one outcome is much preferred to the opposite outcome. The commentary may seem to heighten any supporter feelings which are there, and call for an identification with one team or other, and with the importance of the game itself. Also notice how the commentator peppers the commentary with personal interpretations.
3. Now turn the volume OFF AGAIN and just watch the action with NO audible commentary, the shapes moving around on the screen etc. Again notice all the differences in what is appearing as experience.
4. Now turn the volume ON again and ignore what you think you know thought is talking about, and just notice it as sound.
Is the commentary on the football game a necessity for the play to happen?
Does what the commentator says affect the game in any way?
Does the commentator accurately describe EVERYTHING that is actually happening?
Is the commentary totally in synch with what is actually happening as it happens or is it actually lagging? (its ABOUT something in the PAST, something not happening right NOW )
What effect does the commentary have – is it helpful in any way, is it relaxing, is it difficult to keep up with, is it a distraction from what is actually happening?
And in the same way, is the inner narration of thought a necessity for the play of life to happen?
Does anything in particular about the internal narrator stand out when doing this exercise?
Thanks Jerry. Again, give yourself the tome you needWanted to give a heads up. Will be occupied most of the day tomorrow, though there may be a window to respond.
Alan