My path has been both. Any reaction that comes up during the day is a clue for something deeper. As the knot is unwound, the charge disappears.Am I correct that we don't need to go looking for what may be lurking below the surface; we only need to face what is in our DE?
In many cases, as you get deeper into inquiry, it can become a way to avoid feeling to say 'This is all there is. It all surfaces naturally.' So it depends on what's going on with you.
How do you see what? Can you elaborate?How do you see it?
This sounds like a lot of thinking going back and forth. Thought is not direct experience. Thought is a reflection of a sense or another thought.But here is one for you. It now hits me that if thinking is the DE, then this DE is I. Right? What I am not is any story that thought can tell. No separation means there is nothing to separate or be separate. It's all I, with nothing to stand apart. There is no not I. I am thought, and I am the not thought. Whatever is is what I am. Right?
My worry with this question is that it doesn't hit the mark when it comes to looking for the self that thoughts keep referring to, especially noticing your tendency to go into thinking.The question that resonates is "What is always here?"
Who is thought? Who is not thought?It's all I, with nothing to stand apart. There is no not I. I am thought, and I am the not thought. Whatever is is what I am. Right?
What is being referred to?
Look at the last few posts of thinking and the drive to want to have an answer. Who is it that needs an answer?

