Re: Awakening from the Victim Concept
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2023 9:57 am
Good.
How does it FEEL to see this?
Loving,
How does it FEEL to see this?
Loving,
Liberation Unleashed Forum The Gate
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/viewtopic.php?t=9159
There is contraction around the solar plexus, gut and throat when reading back the pancake paragraph (the other answers feel expansive). Except when I read "Conditions are just arising, no choices"... that part feels expansive in the solar plexus, gut, throat. Much of it is still thought. But, that is seen through direct experiencing.How does it FEEL to see this?
Where is this "I" that did something called "choosing?"I chose to prepare a Dutch pancake for lunch.
Where is this "I" that did something called "choosing?"
Who told you that was a "Dutch pancake?"
Or "lunch?"
I imagine you can see this?
No "I", no choice.We did Palm Flipping back on June 16. Why would you think anyone is "choosing?"
Does the sense of self have a location?
Does the sense of self have a shape or a size?
Does the sense of self say or communicate anything?
If the answer is yes, how does the sense do this exactly?
Does the sense of self have any characteristics or attributes?
What is the sense of self ‘made of’? An image? Sound? Taste? Smell? Sensation? Thought?
What is found?
The answers feel open and expansive, except for;Now, once again, how does it FEEL to see this?
There are thoughts (many of them images) and sensations that describe the sense of self and the world. When investigated it is clear none of this actually belongs to the self but is just appearing in direct experience.
So, really the answer is that it communicates none of what is experienced.
Does the sense of self say or communicate anything?
There are thoughts with a vivid imagination (many images) that seem to correspond to sensations. This experience has a dream-like quality and seems to describe the self and the world/others.

What about the content of thoughts, what they describe?
Is there really an ‘apple’ here, or only color and a thought ABOUT ‘apple’?
Can ‘apple’ be found in actual experience?
However, is an apple actually known?
Have fun and let me know what you find out.
By recognizing that the label is never the thing itself. No thought is direct experience.How to see that content of thought is never true?