Re: Tired of being a Don Quixote fighting windmills
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 9:03 pm
Great, thanks Barb. I’ll be in touch soon. 🙏🏼
Liberation Unleashed Forum The Gate
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/viewtopic.php?t=6980
I don’t believe that the sense of a self as a separate entity is real, no. It cannot be. At the same time, am I as sure of the separate self not existing as I am sure of Santa not existing?1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?
Where does all the thoughts which bubbles up in „your“ mind originate? If you were grewn up in a aboriginal community, would your thoughts not be complete different?Well, I don’t leave a stocking by the Christmas tree anymore expecting Santa will put presents in it but I do still get caught up in the manifestations of something that looks like a separate self. So if I still get caught up in the mirage of it, doesn’t it mean that part of me still believes in it? (Even though through the process of ‘looking’ I have seen that it cannot be real...). Have I just replaced a belief by another belief/ a concept by another concept?
Where does all the thoughts which bubbles up in „your“ mind originate? If you were grewn up in a aboriginal community, would your thoughts not be complete different?
Please put a pen in front of you on the table. Look at it. Then put it away, somewhere where you cannot see it. Then look again at the place on the table where the pen was before.
Can you see/experience the absence of a pen?
Can you experience the absence of something?
Can you experience something which does not exist?
If there is no thought about an „I“, is there an „I“?
Watch the breath. Is there a breather, or only breathing happening.
Watch the process of walking. Does there have to be someone who makes the steps, or does it just happen on its own?
Is there someone who makes „seeing“? With eyes open can you stop seeing? Or does seeing simply happen?
What about thinking?
It's not about knowledge, but about seeing of not knowing. To see clearly that IT is the way it is, no matter what we believe. Until believing becomes completely uninteresting ...
Is there only no need for an "i", or is there simply no "i"?clearly experiencing the difference between real and imaginary, and clearly seeing that there is no need for an ‘i’ for life/emotions to happen.
clearly experiencing the difference between real and imaginary, and clearly seeing that there is no need for an ‘i’ for life/emotions to happen.
Is there only no need for an "i", or is there simply no "i"?
Can you tell how big the body is?
Does the body have a weight or circumference?
Does your body have a shape or form in the current experience?
Is there a border between the body and the clothes?
Is there a border between the body and the surface?
Do know how many toes are there?
Does the body have a name?
Is there an inside or outside? If there is an inside - inside of what?
If there is an outside, the outside of what exactly?
What does the word / term 'body' actually refer to?
Is there something missing when the body is experienced in this way?
Can you find an "I" in experiencing the body?
Was there really a default programm called „this is MY life“ running before the exercise? Or where there only some sensations and thoughts which did interpret them after the experience?At the time this occurred to me, it felt like a shift from my default programming ‘this is MY life’ (life can only be by virtue of being MINE) to ‘life simply is’. It was a bit of a shock to realise that life didn’t need an ‘i’ to be. But now it is clear that there is just no ‘i’ and there never was in first place...
Do this as often it comes in mind during the day, and when it is only for 1 or 2 minutes. The repeatedly looking is the key :) We are so habitual with our conditioning and programming since many, many years.. We have really constant and often to look to make the knowing, that there is life flowing without separation, to the new normal...From the moment I closed my eyes and looked for the body for the first time, it is like it instantly dissolved into thin air. There was breathing and a pulse but nothing else. It felt nearly magical, like a floating sensation at first then nothing. It was wonderful not to feel that usual heaviness of body and mind (the words ‘ether’ and ‘bliss’ came to mind)
Is it necesarry that an experience is called „my“ experience? Is it not enough that there is experience which is self-aware?It definitely does not feel like it’s missing - it is just not there. It feels a bit like a magic trick: there this body used to be (in my experience), there it isn’t anymore (in my experience).
Can you find a liquid, gaseous or ethereal entity?No I can only find ‘isness’, no solid entity ‘i’
There was a belief that there was a ‘me’ that owned that life yes.Was there really a default programm called „this is MY life“ running before the exercise? Or where there only some sensations and thoughts which did interpret them after the experience?
Yes I meant ‘in experience’ but I guess using ‘my’ is a force of habit.Is it necesarry that an experience is called „my“ experience? Is it not enough that there is experience which is self-aware?
Nothing liquid, gaseous or ethereal and no, no entity at all. Just existence.Can you find a liquid, gaseous or ethereal entity?
Can you find an entity at all?
Is „belief“ more than thoughts? Is this belief still there?There was a belief that there was a ‘me’ that owned that life yes.