Enough is enough!

All threads where seeing happens are stored here. The complete list, sorted by guide, contains all links. The archives include threads of those that came to LU already seeing as well.
You are welcome to continue your conversation with your guide here after your name is turned blue.
User avatar
John Millar
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 3:27 pm

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby John Millar » Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:05 pm

Can you refine the LOOKing? Who told you that?
Has LOOKing become something like a training for you?
Yes, I think you're right. Making a causal expectation, if I get it 'right' results should follow
Refining doesn't make sense, a habit-pattern - along the lines of 'there must be something I'm doing wrong, so what should "I" do?' Refine or fine-tune or anything that keeps a self-important doer in the picture?
Yes, tendency to put-off LOOKing until a 'suitable time' when I'm ready, like a time for meditation or music practice - not always like this, but I've noticed the putting-off, compartmentalizing thing happening sometimes.
I'm afraid you are complicating things here. Yes, "Who cares?"
Literally, WHO IS IT THAT CARES?
Par for the course, tending to complicate that which is simple (and often over-simplifying that which is more complex...:-))
LOOKing is simple, John.
Throw out all those Anatta or Anicca or Sunyata ... whatever ... verviage (sorry for the use of
this kind of strong word) and ...

JUST LOOK, please. Feel the sound, the touch, the smell, see the sight,
and LOOK if there's any subject that is doing them.
Thanks for such fine and timely advice, Bananafish!
What is that "indication?"
Who told you that the gate should be "reached?"
Sorry, clumsy but revealing use of language! I should save the 'hot air' for the clarinet!

Bananafish
Posts: 5155
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:29 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby Bananafish » Sun Dec 27, 2015 12:50 pm

so what should "I" do?' Refine or fine-tune or anything that keeps a self-important doer in the picture?
Do you still feel that the "I" in parentheses can do anything at all?
Can the "I" do anything?
Try moving one of your fingers. Did the "I" do that?


LOOK at your thought. Did the "I" think that thought?

Yes, tendency to put-off LOOKing until a 'suitable time' when I'm ready, like a time for meditation or music practice - not always like this, but I've noticed the putting-off, compartmentalizing thing happening sometimes.
Ok. Is that a problem? If so, for whom is it a problem?


Warm regards,

Bananafish

User avatar
John Millar
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 3:27 pm

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby John Millar » Mon Dec 28, 2015 3:22 pm

Ha, spent all afternoon (wedged between a large bit of work that should be completed today) on responding to your incredibly stimulating and pertinent comments, Bananafish, but didn't save the response, and all has been lost to cyberspace! Ha ha! Trust you've had a pleasant Christmas, although I guess in your part of the planet that's not such a big deal? Ours went quietly.

So, I'll try again, from scratch:
Do you still feel that the "I" in parentheses can do anything at all?
Recalling the earlier response to this that was lost to cyberspace, I felt then that to say 'no' to this would have been pretentious. Trusting that there is no pretense now, the response is 'no'!
Can the "I" do anything?
Try moving one of your fingers. Did the "I" do that?
Well, right now, can't find an "I" to do anything, but earlier, some sense of self was there (defense mechanism around a big pile of nothing) and entertaining the idea of an "I" moving the finger produced a freeze - the idea of an "I" was incapable of doing anything. Right now, moving finger, a response to the suggestion via 'you' via cyberspace via the computer...
LOOK at your thought. Did the "I" think that thought?
No, just responses, occasionally seeing snippets of causality, evidence piling in, even this bundle of delusion may well give up refusing to see soon! LOOKing at thought, seems to be a marked absence of thought at the moment... A bit of verbalisation floating through regarding responses before the fingers move on the keyboard. No I, just awareness, sometimes more directed, sometimes more focused...
Trying to latch onto the key here, but there seems to be nothing to latch on to - not wanting this to just be another notch-in-the-belt transient spiritual experience that somehow dissipates even though in the experience there is nothing more certain...
With soooo much gratitude, Bananafish! Sorry this has been such a protracted manifestation of such stubbornness and spiritual skulduggery! Seems hilarious. I'll submit this, and then run through your questions again - right on the mark!

User avatar
John Millar
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 3:27 pm

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby John Millar » Mon Dec 28, 2015 3:38 pm

p.s. noticed that my second (successful) attempt to respond missed your last question, which was a great one!
(regarding "tendency to put off LOOKing until a 'suitable time'...")
Ok. Is that a problem? If so, for whom is it a problem?
As might be expected from a somewhat wayward and discursive bundle of conditioning, there has been an ingrained 'habit-thought' that there is always something "I" "should" be doing. Falling away now. The universe will keep unfolding, life living... Waking up to the is-ness of all this, nothing to change, no 'self' to change anything. Earlier in the day there was a sense of loss rising as tensions (carring 'self' projections) swelled when admitting that there is no problem and no-one to whom this is a problem - such a divine paradox - dissipated!

Bananafish
Posts: 5155
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:29 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby Bananafish » Thu Dec 31, 2015 4:50 am

Well, right now, can't find an "I" to do anything, but earlier, some sense of self was there (defense mechanism around a big pile of nothing) and entertaining the idea of an "I" moving the finger produced a freeze - the idea of an "I" was incapable of doing anything. Right now, moving finger, a response to the suggestion via 'you' via cyberspace via the computer...
NIce. :) How is that "defence mechanism" working? What is it trying to defend?
Who is the defender?

With soooo much gratitude, Bananafish! Sorry this has been such a protracted manifestation of such stubbornness and spiritual skulduggery! Seems hilarious. I'll submit this, and then run through your questions again - right on the mark!
Hehe, no problem, John!
We'll do this together, ok?

Best wishes for the New Year, John!

Bananafish
Posts: 5155
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:29 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby Bananafish » Thu Dec 31, 2015 4:52 am

p.s. noticed that my second (successful) attempt to respond missed your last question, which was a great one!
(regarding "tendency to put off LOOKing until a 'suitable time'...")
Ok. Is that a problem? If so, for whom is it a problem?
As might be expected from a somewhat wayward and discursive bundle of conditioning, there has been an ingrained 'habit-thought' that there is always something "I" "should" be doing. Falling away now. The universe will keep unfolding, life living... Waking up to the is-ness of all this, nothing to change, no 'self' to change anything. Earlier in the day there was a sense of loss rising as tensions (carring 'self' projections) swelled when admitting that there is no problem and no-one to whom this is a problem - such a divine paradox - dissipated!
Great work!
Was it like a shift that happened with the understanding?

User avatar
John Millar
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 3:27 pm

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby John Millar » Thu Dec 31, 2015 9:47 am

NIce. :) How is that "defence mechanism" working?
Feelings that swell-up of special-ness, sorrow, need (for acknowledgement), (there used to be fear, angst, etc., now the mechanisms are more subtle, but equally misleading - implying that there is something under the layers of protection/defense)...
What is it trying to defend?
An idea that has somehow been assumed (learned) and then protected by networks of tension
Who is the defender?
Another idea, connected with that which is being defended, a big fat no-thing!
Hmmm. Put like this, close to quoting something straight off the LU site - "Sense of self: thoughts about feelings about thoughts"... No defender, just defense -> unravels to reveal nothing to be defended. So, 'defense' term loses its meaning.... Just tensions, feelings, etc, burning/transforming/dissipating (with rather more ease than when there was a knight in shining armor thrashing around in an internal crusade to slay the defilements! - a perhaps rather overstated colorful depiction of what has been going on off-and-on over the past 30 years...)

So, this has all been about...nothing (nothing more than a monstrous aberration!)
Hehe, no problem, John!
We'll do this together, ok?
Thanks!
Great work!
Was it like a shift that happened with the understanding?
Yes! Prompting LOOKing into 'why I was making a problem about putting off LOOKing until a suitable time' triggered a shift. There have been other shifts when you've managed to expose some of the tricks going on in this mind-body to perpetuate the illusion. It's a bit like rounding up sheep in difficult terrain... The most significant shift (visceral relief) is realising that all the stuff does not have to be resolved before the self-illusion dissipates.

Don't want to imply too much, here, though. The present situation is experientially-grounded, but, well, nothing - there is no self here when LOOKing, and the kind of confidence that this is so when not, even when self-referencing thoughts arise - it's an interesting experiential space at the moment - reviewing a paper for a journal that rejected (some years ago) a paper of 'mine'. Looking at various self (self-important)-thought chains blowing up out of no-where, laughing at the irony of constantly being asked to review papers for a journal that has never thought 'my' work was good enough for publication there, blind leading the blind...

There has been the concern of, well, "is that it?" But it seems now, whilst still LOOKing, that even if some submerged at-present-out-of-sight selfing-feeling arises, its no big deal. There is the sense of wanting to share, but there's no-one to play some 'self-realised' role. No claim. The energy level is quite high at present, almost euphoric, so it's worth checking when things settle. Ah, things are settling! Just presence. Why can't a 'self' be found? Because there is no such thing, there can be no such thing, logically, experientially! Let's check the credibility of these assertions!

Yes, may 2016 be a fine year, with this vital re-orienting of the pathless-path to the gateless-gate rippling out to those who are ready - expounded, realised and practised so effectively by the work you are all doing on this site!

With gratitude (some tears!)
John

Bananafish
Posts: 5155
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:29 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby Bananafish » Wed Jan 06, 2016 4:48 am

Hi John!
Sorry for the delay in reply ...

Your last post was a wonderful description of
your understanding!

How's it settling?

Do you want to proceed to the final questions?

If no, please don't hesitate to ask for further help.
I'll be always here for you. :)

User avatar
John Millar
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 3:27 pm

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby John Millar » Thu Jan 07, 2016 11:54 am

Hi Bananafish!

Sorry for the delay in reply ...
No worries, time has been needed to check this out!
Your last post was a wonderful description of
your understanding!
Thanks. It seems that this has been more a matter of keeping up an illusion despite overwhelming evidence! The prompts from you have been so pertinent, the growing realization that the self is not needed to keep the show running (i.e. that no-self does not imply nihilism...) and the growing imperative that living a lie is ludicrous eventually brought this being to a point of giving up the facade...
How's it settling?
With a new take on the exploration. Nothing has changed (and everything has changed...).
A few examples from the last few days: although I'm fairly mild-tempered, the other day, driving at the speed limit, a big SUV did a quite dangerous undertaking and cutting off routine (probably because I was being such a "lemon" and driving "only" at the speed limit - on an on-ramp to a very icy bit of motorway with some road works - Finns tend to slow down for rain and fog, but not for ice and snow...). Noticed a very clear arising of fear/anger - a kind of animal response to a threatening situation. This disappeared after the incident. Now, previously, I wouldn't have got involved in road-rage or anything like that, but my partner Eyvor agreed that I would have had some rather unpleasant comments directed to the irresponsible driver, but there was no imprint at all from the thing, just the surprise that once the danger was over, there was no further reaction or story concoction... Noticing habit patterns, like chewing my lip when thinking, but now there's no judgement. It feels like a lot of old baggage is dropping off - still a lot to go! Woke up this morning feeling very serene, the heart felt clear, the realisation of no-self has been quite hard on the heart area, which seems to have been the main visceral selfing region in this mind-body, LOOKing at the entity-behind-the eyes self-assumption seems to have been less physically traumatic. Anyway, there was a deep peace this morning - nothing transcendentally earth-moving, just a deep OK-ness with no self...
Do you want to proceed to the final questions?
It seems so! Beginning of life without self. Or life where the keeping up the facade of self has been dropped... Yes, fire away, Bananafish. Let the final questions roll, let life without the self-illusion unfold!
If no, please don't hesitate to ask for further help.
I'll be always here for you. :)
Thanks for such a generous offering of time to the demolition of this selfing-project!
Wow!

Bananafish
Posts: 5155
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:29 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby Bananafish » Fri Jan 08, 2016 12:41 pm

Great, John! So, here we go ... just a couple of things to note before we start;
please (as we've always done) answer when you're 100% sure, with 100% honesty.

Also, please don't try to answer in a "right" way,
i.e. in a way which you think I would feel is correct.


I will be out of town till Jan.14, and as there would be no internet connection there,
I won't be able to respond to you during this period ... so take your time.

Thanks again John for your wonderful inquiries, and see you soon ... enjoy! :)




1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?

2) Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience. Describe it fully as you see it now.

3) How does it feel to see this? What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.

4) What was the last bit that pushed you over, made you look?

5) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? What are you responsible for? Give examples from experience.

6) Anything to add?




Best,

Bananafish

User avatar
John Millar
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 3:27 pm

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby John Millar » Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:58 pm

Hi Bananafish,

So sorry for the long silence. No sign of self, but this mind-body typing has been insanely busy with a ridiculous work-load! Should find time on Thursday to address the final questions - actually have a fairly lengthy draft on my computer, but will try to more succinctly respond in real time on Thursday. Many thanks, and hope you're faring well!

Bananafish
Posts: 5155
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:29 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby Bananafish » Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:33 pm

Hi John!
Good to hear from you. :)

Take your time in answering the questions.
Remember to be 100% honest!

Regards,

Bananafish

Bananafish
Posts: 5155
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:29 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby Bananafish » Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:15 am

Hi John!
Haven't heard from you for a while.

How's the inquiry going?
Hope everything's going well ...

Peace,

Bananafish

User avatar
John Millar
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 3:27 pm

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby John Millar » Wed Feb 24, 2016 6:24 pm

Dear Bananafish!
Sorry about the long silence. Been keeping a working document logging responses to the set of 'final' questions.
Trust things are well with you. Just being lived by life. As usual, lots of content, two funerals, way too much work, just doing what I do, nothing sticking, habits playing out. So, I figure it's time to release the responses, but true to form, they are rather lengthy and still smack of the pretentious verbalising habit that is shedding and sharpening... Here goes, sorry for such a tsunami after the long silence!
1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?
There would seem to be a spatially and temporally relatively discreet but interconnected mind-body that was given the name John, etc. Useful to have a name. But even at this level, there is nothing separate. Question is about a ‘self’, ‘me’, ‘I’. Useful but empty labels. Now they are leaving no imprint in this experiencing. No entity behind the label, never was, seems strange looking back in time, but there was never a self, just a fictional side-show/filtering. Experiences, intuitions, evidence and even logic held back by an agreed fiction, until a few days ago... Ah, I must be honest – just noticed (when given an impossible task and too little time, that I blamed others, and got into some self-important whining... boo hoo! Also, yesterday, in shop with Eyvor, noticed a bit of ego stuff when being got at for not realising where the end of a queue was, but went into this, powerful surge - clearing. This morning, noticed fantasy trip, excessive verbalisation, went deeper, noticed a kind of shadow of selfing that this verbiage seemed to be camoflaging, no self of course, but selfing habit patterns still emanating..., but confidence, when noticed, that there is really nothing there - A few weeks later: Who cares? Looking for self for several weeks now, two funerals, work lay-offs, unbelievable over-work for those of us ‘lucky enough’ to have a job. Incredible. But what would have generated feelings of angst now finds nothing to fixate on. But still habits working themselves out. No recrimination, though...
2) Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience. Describe it fully as you see it now.
A habitual (which gives it the appearance of being continuous and ‘real’) set of tensions/defences/visceral amouring protecting what was assumed to be self (I say ‘set of’ because when LOOKing, there has sometimes seemed to be multiple self-identities, with shades of child-John, mother, father, other significant personalities in the life, adult John, engineer John, meditator John, musician John). More concretely, there was the unquestioned assumption of a self behind the eyes, a clingier heart-centered selfing, sometimes a nauseous gut level identification... Self has come up to claim experiences, even (or maybe especially) after ‘transcendental non-self’ meditation experiences, self has been assumed even when trying to uproot the self-illusion, a sticking point in insight practice... A few weeks later: there is a utility in having a name, etc... fair enough. Still some tripping up, kind of hollow selfing, nothing sticking though...
3) How does it feel to see this? What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.
It seems ridiculous, but, despite transient self-less states in and out of meditation, there was the hidden assumption of an entity seeking liberation and, although I wouldn’t have admitted it, the assumption that liberation is associated with an exotic meditation-type mind state – floating in a cloud of bliss or something! So, experientially, there was a lot of ‘self’-judgement, flip-flopping between exulted jhana-type states and assumed-ego-jumping-in-to-claim-the-show. There seems to have been a major shift from wanting to profess or manifest a state of clarity that was not there to a kind of reluctance to admit the reality of what has now dawned! A frozen shoulder from computer mouse and maybe clarinet – sometimes pain, but no wailing – meaning no adding to it. Things are smoothing out a bit now, but a couple of weeks ago, around the time of the last post, there were periods of being in a very strange, somewhat disoriented time-space. Almost as if a persona had to be formed to match the situation – e.g., when engaged with responding to your questions, a researcher came in with some questions. This seemed so strange – has to act the relevant role for a few seconds before engaging with the researcher’s questions. I have asked my partner Eyvor to be patient with me over the last couple of weeks, explaining that some deconstruction has gone on, and things are a bit fragile! Actually, there is a bit more efficiency now, (which, for example, meant that answering these questions has not been first priority – and remembering this has not given rise to self-reprobation – just prompted LOOKing). Can only do so much. Been too much of a yes-man. The Finnish economy is in the duldrums despite having been in Merkel’s austerity club when the recession began. Politicians thrash around, but macro-issues limit what they can do. The overwork and stress of the work-place (despite trying to stay at the bottom of the university food-chain) are outside ‘my’ control, so do the best and let what flows, flow. Just a lot less self-judgement, and when that habit arises, nothing for it to stick to. Yes, it’s more a gradual dawning of something quite obvious, for some reason avoided. A few weeks later: not so much of the lack-of-a-persona problem any more. Just fluidly move between the various roles.
4) What was the last bit that pushed you over, made you look?
This has been a stage-wise progress, a very significant part of a life-long endeavour. Acquainting myself with LU and especially after you kindly agreed to be my guide, Bananafish, I have engaged in LOOKing, loosened the assumption that there is an entity LOOKing when prompted by such questions as, “Is there an "I" that is still caught up, or is "I'm still caught up" just another thought?”, held no-self as a working hypothesis. In a 10 day retreat couldn’t find the self in the 4th Jhana, for example, let go of the self assumption when walking, the living experience lit up, walked in nature, just walking, noticed that the mind-body checks for danger without self, gradually, logically and empirically the no-self evidence has become overwhelming, but habit patterns are still dissipating... Don’t want to claim anything, nobody to claim anything, but don’t want to indicate that no-self has not been SEEN either.
A few weeks later, going through our dialogue, the following questions/prompts seem the most pertinent:
• Is there an "I" that is still caught up, or is "I'm still caught up" just another thought?
• Is "still not there" a sensation? Is a thought "still not there" attached to that sensation, or is that sensation itself "still not there?"
• SO, what's the problem? Habits are habits. Who told you that you have to eliminate your habits to see it?
• Right, right, hehe. But did you notice that this notion of ego-elimination, or whatever, is just an idea, or thought?
• What makes you swing between seeing and losing it? Who loses it?
• Is "acting on automatic pilot" a problem?
• I'm afraid you are complicating things here. Yes, "Who cares?" Literally, WHO IS IT THAT CARES?
Ok. Is that a problem? If so, for whom is it a problem?
It has been partly a matter of just admitting what is, and these questions have cut through layers of prevarication and pretense. Yes, this ‘making a problem of everything’ was one engrained strand of delusion. “For whom is it a problem” nailed this whole self-referencing and projection thing. This idea of self doesn’t have a leg to stand on.
5) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? What are you responsible for? Give examples from experience.
Decision is always after the event. OK, that’s a rote response. LOOKing for an entity that can decide anything is futile, but this is the reality when LOOKing, not the assumed reality when not LOOKing. My beer was sliding of the table in a bar a few months ago, the hand lept out and caught the glass, clearly no time for a decision there. Science indicates that when we feel we make major decisions, there has been some brain activity up to 6 seconds before... A combination of experienced and non-experienced argument about why there isn’t a decision maker... When out of the way, there is fluid response, often experienced. Often experienced also is the assumption of a self jumping in and screwing things up... Intention: this is interesting. It now seems absurd, for example, to aspire to awaken for the sake of all sentient beings.... Who can awaken to what? Even a more refined concept like inclining towards the wholesome seems suspect, but if I had not, would I have been led to this stage of liberation? Free will. Although this has long been seen as rididiculous in an absolute sense, it would seem that it is also unecessary as a working paradigm. Can’t say I’ve let go into this fully, but it seems that at some point that spontaneous unfolding/responding/riding-the-wave-of-consciousness should be possible. Choice and control, such understandable but ridiculous pretention! Kind of reversal of the pretense this being has been involved in... What makes things happen? The price of fish in Calcutta? Ha, ha. This is verging on the metaphysical, and outside this experience. Life would seem to be a complex web of temporal and spatial conditioning, but this too is a rote answer. Life just lives, why? Who knows? Who is there to know? How does it work? How does what work? Life? Living? A mind body, projected separateness, seeks and strives, a mind-body, realised one-ness, still needs food, shelter, gravitates towards sanity, curiosity, resonates with life, sorry, rote answer again... Who knows, presense knows, awareness knows, rote answers again...

Sitting surpervising exam. Responding, student has finished, stand, take paper, smile, check their ID, seems to all be responding, to a sound, a sight, yes, there is a kind of local processing going on, but a ‘self’ no. Not even ‘selfing’ if things are safe... The bit of stress setting up the exam for so many students in a shared hall, straight after lecturing, straight after a project group meeting did give rise to a bit of self-important posturing that rests on the assumption of self, which has been SEEN though clearly, but, like a stuck record... No worries, when SEEing the selfing happening, there is no further imprint, no further self-judging, it’s just playing out, and when it has played out, no more? Oh yeah, about to say time will tell, putting of SEEing, there is no-one to SEE, nothing to accomplish, just a few eddy currents in the river, which is water...
6) Anything to add?
A kind of lackadaisical attitude lately. No entity to respond, sometimes in a kind of stalled presence, gently or not so gently prodded by my beloved Eyvor, asked her to be gentle with this fragile being, this living without a driver. At one level, NO SELF when LOOKing, at another level, selfing evident in recall and mental verbalisation. Work in progress.
– breathes air breathed out from trees, drinks water that has been through countless other living beings, made of star dust like all other physical manifestations
- was a parentally, societally, evolutionary illusion, doesn’t seem to belong anywhere LOOKing back in time, which seems a bit silly.
Seem to have lost the self-reprimanding, but not the habits that gave rise to those reactions. So, will have to further let go, LOOK, abandon old ways. A few weeks later: sometimes feels like falling, but it’s more like no-one to hold on to anything rather than nothing to hold on to...


Thanks for staying with this, Bananafish, and thanks for the prompts to be honest. It feels as if raw life is breaking through a facade of pretense and 'wanting to please and be liked', but at the same time it's all very sobering. I don't think the ramifications of this have fully dawned! No idea where this is going!

Be well, and don't be afraid to pull out the stick!
John

Bananafish
Posts: 5155
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:29 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Enough is enough!

Postby Bananafish » Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:18 pm

Dear John,

Thank you so much for your beautiful answers. :)
Reading them felt like being swallowed by a word-tsunami ... hehe.



Having read all of your last post,
here's one thing I want to make sure:


You wrote ...

"There would seem to be a spatially and temporally relatively discreet but
interconnected mind-body that was given the name John, etc."


There are raw experiences of hearing, seeing, touching, smelling, and tasting.
Are they the "body" itself, or is "body" a label attached to these experiences?


Thoughts appear and disappear.
Are they the "mind" itself, or is "mind" another label
for a pattern of thoughts that appear and disappear?



Peace,

Bananafish


Return to “ARCHIVES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 80 guests