Page 5 of 6
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 2:41 am
by Jack'n'theBox
there is no self in the present moment,
Right! And given that the present moment is the only 'time' that can actually be experienced this does suggest there is no self period!
and that has been increasing frustrating with the automation of "past"/"future" I. how much time I spend thinking of what will do, planning, and what I have done, reminiscing
Right. "I" lives in past and future thoughts -- it is projected in thought -- but can it be found outside thought?
I get more and more frustrated realizing that there is work that can be done in the present moment but it never does because there is too much energy spent on past/future!!
Remember we aren't trying to stop thoughts -- that isn't possible anyway -- we are looking instead to see if thoughts are true -- do we believe them?
Many fictitious things are referenced in thought: unicorns, vampires, Santa, "me".
When "I" thoughts crop up -- just notice them -- you could even ask them "OK so where is this 'I' character you are going on about?" and see if thought can come up with any evidence for an actual 'I' that isn't just another thought!
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:31 am
by ttrp
I can't find any "I"happening in external events, ust the thoughts that suggest one and more thoughts about it
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 7:07 am
by Jack'n'theBox
OK so "I" is a character that appears only in thought -- maybe this exercise will help emphasise this point:
Think of a scene in the last novel/movie you read or saw that really moved you, maybe you even shed a tear. Maybe you were sad about the event in the novel for a day or so maybe you even feel a twinge of sadness now when you remember the scene and your response. However what you probably didn’t do when you read the sad scene is cancel your appointments or not have dinner with your partner because you were ‘too sad at this thing that happened in a novel’. Nobody acts like that because we know the characters in a novel aren’t real – that doesn’t stop us having affective responses to them – but we don’t take what happens in a novel PERSONALLY.
OK now go into a memory from your past where you felt sad – maybe someone wronged you. Feel the intensity of that feeling – maybe betrayal, maybe guilt, but an underlying unhappiness. Visualise the harsh words said, the tears, the recriminations. Revisit those emotions. Alright, you’ve just visualised a scene from the ‘story of me.’ Explain to me how, in experience (what is happening in the moment, right now) how these two visualisations are different – the sad scene in the novel and the sad scene in ‘my life’. How is the 'I' character any different – in the visualisation of the scene in the moment – any different from the very same mental processes that conjure up the sad scene involving the character from the pages of the novel?
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:21 pm
by ttrp
hello sorry again. I keep getting unexpected work this tme of year and so I took advantage of it :)
I see what you mean/ there is the story of "me" what happened.. what was done.. an arc.. not unlike the book. if I made a book about "me" that would be just as real.
the only difference is this story of me has been invested into for years and years and been told to myself in thought that it is true and that the "main character" governs future actions
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2015 7:48 pm
by Jack'n'theBox
the only difference is this story of me has been invested into for years and years and been told to myself in thought that it is true and that the "main character" governs future actions
OK great. So:
1. What has invested in the story? There is only this moment, right? So isn't this 'investment' part of the story?
2. "Told to myself in thought"? Where is this self that thought is talking to?
3. These "future actions" that the character says it governs -- where are they -- can you find, now, a "future" action?
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2015 11:34 pm
by ttrp
hey. still in the process of moving/new job etc sorry. I'll get back to this asap
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 10:44 pm
by Jack'n'theBox
Whassup?
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2015 10:15 pm
by ttrp
hey there things got really hectic for me. Finally things are in order. moving across the country was trickier than expected. do you mind continuing this now? sorry for my absence :) it was nice to take a break fromthe internet
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 10:44 pm
by Jack'n'theBox
Sure, how about picking up where we left off and answering those above question?
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 8:47 pm
by ttrp
the only difference is this story of me has been invested into for years and years and been told to myself in thought that it is true and that the "main character" governs future actions
OK great. So:
1. What has invested in the story? There is only this moment, right? So isn't this 'investment' part of the story?
2. "Told to myself in thought"? Where is this self that thought is talking to?
3. These "future actions" that the character says it governs -- where are they -- can you find, now, a "future" action?
the only thing investd in a story... is a thought that says invested in a story... os yes that is right
again the "self" that thought is talking to is in story... a story of a self which talks
no.. a future action cannot be found as a physical object.. I can't just looking around the room and see "future action" just the thought about one , a projection
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:23 am
by Jack'n'theBox
So earlier we saw that thoughts in the present about a fictional character in a book, like "Why did he do that?" or "What will he do next?" are, in direct experience, equivalent to thoughts about "me", like "Why did I do that? What should I do next?"
You don't believe that the thoughts about a character in a book point to a "real" entity -- so why do you believe that that the thoughts about a character called "me" point to a real thing?
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:40 am
by ttrp
I guess that I believe that because "my" experoence have been.. experienced and memory can recall them.. they are "true" facts reporting on events of the best . the beleif is that the story describes a total experience of this body
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:24 am
by Jack'n'theBox
Do you have any direct experience of "this body"? I mean if you sit down in a chair now and try to experience "body" what do you actually find? Have a look and let me know.
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 12:09 am
by ttrp
hm my reply dissappeared again!!
I don't have a direct experience with a body that is "mine".. there is the sensation of a body, and thoughts "my body" but no body of "mine" there is hte body I m quite familiar with and have spent my life with but it is just a body
Re: Lets try this again..
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 12:24 am
by Jack'n'theBox
Really? Is there a sensation of a "body" or just disparate sensations that you then apply the label "body" to?
Are these sensations constant or changing? If the latter, how can you have "spent your life" with them?
Check it our -- sit in a chair and bring attention to "the body" -- can you experience such a "thing"? Note that there are patches of more or less intense sensation -- with gaps in between.
Can you find a line where "body" stops and "chair" or "floor" begins?
this short guided meditation may help you to get this:
http://non-duality.rupertspira.com/list ... f-the-body