Thats fine, if your not done, your not done. You are the one that needs to do the work though.
I am not sure how to describe the place that I'm in right now. I cannot tell whether this is all still conceptual or a direct experience / deep knowing. What feels different is that the process still seems to be working through me, moving from a conceptual standpoint towards more and more of a sense of certainty.
doubt is fine too. Doubts are just thoughts about stuff.There is a lot of doubt here, probably related to all of the spiritual concepts and expectations regarding the "spiritual path" that I've accumulated through the years. Now I understand how someone coming to this without a background in the whole spiritual thing might have an easier time with the process (less to deconstruct?).
This is what I was getting at when I asked early on in our thread what you expected to happen. You said you didnt expect anything to happen, but most people come here with at least an idea of what they think will happen. So ye, it may be mind shattering, big bang, ultra blissful. Or it may not. Having those experiences, or not having those experiences is no indication of whether you have "seen". They are just experiences.I guess for such a long time I had this belief that the direct experience of no self was supposed to be this mind shattering, big bang, ultra blissful experience, or something that only comes about through much practice.
It is that simple and easy. If you see that there is no self to do any of the things we attribute to it, then thats it, you have seen through the lie, the belief in a self. You believed that there was a self that made decisions. If you look and see that there is no self to make decisions, then you are seeing through the belief.I am reminded of your statement that I am already having a direct experience of no self, and my whole life has been a direct experience of no self. Can it be this simple and easy?
If there is no self, then doesnt it follow that there never was a self, and that you cant experience something that doesnt exist. Saying you are looking for an experience of "no self" is turning it into a search for a certain feeling, or experience, and thats not what we are about here. The aim is not to experience "no self" ( how would you do that anyway?) , we are looking at the belief in self and seeing if its true.
You believed in santa at one point. Are you now having an experience of "no santa"?
Yes, its just another thing, like digestion, or liver function, or blood circulation.I got into Buddhism because of dukkha. I have a history of depression and heard that Buddhism was about the end of dukkha, so that's what got me into meditation. There is still dukkha present, but there is less clinging to it as "my" dukkha. Depression is seen as one of the mental states this body/mind pattern has manifested, but it is taken less personally now. To me this means a lot.
Is depression anything more than a set of thoughts and feelings/bodily sensations? Notice how thought labels this set of thoughts/feelings as "depression". So already we are abstracted away from reality, because depression has so many other concepts associated with it. It gets labelled "bad", which means we automatically turn away from it, reject it, try and escape from it. When really, its just another set of thoughts and feelings.
Although we have looked quite closely at thoughts as an object, we havent really considered the content of thought.
Take a look around the room, look at objects, hear sounds. Do you notice what happens when you do this? What is happening in the content of thought?

