Hi Rali,
Thanks for these questions! Something seemed to slide around in my brain a bit… the “I” is off on a coffee break or something…
So if “I” is just a word in language/ a concept, how can a concept take credit? Can a thought think itself? Who’s owning what?
Can an illusion do things?
Looking and seeing is happening just happening and concepts can’t take credit; the taking credit is an illusion.
Is there an entity that moves with the ocean? OR there is only the ocean – the tides, the waves, the winds – happening to no one?
This question resonated with me and felt really scary for some reason. I think something slipped away, but it might have also just hidden and i can’t find it.
There’s no one in the ocean anymore.
Is presence something added to experience… or just another word for what’s already happening, before any naming?
Similarly with experience… This is a loaded word as it presupposes an experiencer/presence. But look – is there one?
I think it can be both, but I’m seeing a clearer distinction now. Presence / experience is just there, regardless. BUt there’s also the possibility of throwing the concept of presence/experience on top of what is just actual presence/experience. I think I was using it as a more enlightened term for awareness, but it’s not. It’s the ocean.
If you drop the words “presence”/”experience” entirely — without replacing them — what’s actually here? Just whatever is happening? Do you need presence for this to be here silently? If yes, how do you know that? Or that is an assumption?
It’s probably an assumption. I keep coming back to my being in the ocean metaphor. Is it necessary for a body to be in the ocean or is the ocean just ocean-ing? No experiencer is necessary for the ocean to be.
is presence something I "pick up" when i remember to?
Nope.
Revisit the “blackness” exercise… Do you find any evidence for anything besides the seen (i.e. the blackness)? Any eyes / Lanie / any entity at all in any shape or form witnessing/being present?
Can you find anything that isn’t already happening — before the thought?
Weirdly, no.
Even thinking about things with my eyes closed - like my relationship with my mom, for example - feels sort of universal and not personal. There’s still all the love and the stories and all of that but it feels hypothetical at this moment in an odd way and like the stories of what’s complicated and what’s good are unimportant mush. I don’t feel a witnesser and things that used to be of interest or concern feel like they’ve lost their gravitational pull on my mind.
Who or what is “turning” toward direct experience? Is there a separate one apart from DE who “remembers” or “intends” to land there?
And if DE/this is all there is, where else could you land?
What if the idea of “noticing” DE is itself another movement of mind — creating the illusion of distance from it?
Can this moment be missed — without thought saying it was?
Is there ever an experience outside of this?
I like what you said about how noticing DE is another movement of mind, creating the illusion of distance. There’s such a dichotomy formed when you say “I need to pay attention to X.”
You asked if DE is all there is, where else could you land - for me it’s being lost in thoughts that I’m not even paying attention to. So in that sense, I think the moment can be missed, but maybe I’m creating a false dichotomy between being lost in fantasy and the “real” world.
Does intention appear before what is happening — or after?
I often set intentions before I meditate or go for a walk. I think they function to prime the mind in that direction. Listening to dharma teachings or any kind of topic influences thoughts; influenced thoughts are more likely to tend towards certain directions and i think intentions are part of that.
Sit with an impulse — maybe the intention to move your hand, take a breath, or shift your attention.
Can you actually find the intention before the movement or shift… or does it arise with or after the happening?
Is it really causing anything — or is it simply describing what’s already unfolding?
I think we might be using the word intention differently. :)
I would do this and set an intention to move my finger at some time in the next few seconds, and it’s really apparent to me that the finger moves before I hear my brain say “move.” So (for me) the order is intention → movement → brain claims to have made a decision that was second in the order, not third.
If everything is already happening… what would intention be “for”?
Is intention just another thought about what is — a mental commentary arriving milliseconds later, claiming authorship?
Like the closing credits trying to take credit for the movie that already played?
Intentions come first, and well before any decisions to take action (in Canada). :) It’s more like emotionally preparing yourself to consider beginning a task. Or before going for a walk, reminding yourself to be mindful of the sounds while you’re walking.
So ask in real-time:
Did I intend this… or is that just a thought arising after the fact?
This simple looking can begin to unravel the deeply held sense of being a “doer.” What remains, without that?
I think this is clear for me.
Is there a difference between abiding in tranquillity and moving in thought?
I think both are just in aliveness.
What makes one feel like "awakening" and the other not?
I used to feel really trapped by my thoughts and like I had to fix ALL my thoughts to be free and I couldn’t feel out how to do that and it was incredibly constraining. I like your comment about resistance. I’ve heard that so many times but am considering it more deeply right now.
I think what you’re saying here is that there’s noticing that is automatic, and it doesn’t matter whether the noticing is DE or thought related.
Who/what can be enlightened? Thoughts?
Who is everyone? Are there others in DE?
Is anything outside of what is — even distraction, even forgetting?
I don’t think anyone can be enlightened and there really aren’t others in DE - just experiences in the soup of what is here right now.
Distraction and forgetting are not outside of what is. I think there’s sort of a stigma against these things and an internal belief that they are bad.
So what is “not being present is presence too” really pointing to?
I think this is another definition of non-duality - there’s not two things, presence and absence, there’s only one thing and that’s this.
Can this moment be anything other than what it is?
Is confusion arising outside of what is — or within it, like a ripple on still water?
I like the definition of awakening being losing the belief of separation and the striving to be present. Losing that resistance to what is.
So yes, this moment is what it is, including its confusions.
Where is that echo being experienced?
Is the sensation of echo in the body — or is it the label “echo” being added to present sensation?
Does the body echo prove the past… or is it simply something appearing now?
You’re right; the body echo is being added now to “prove” the past.
When recalling the dream, is there any actual difference in the experience of the dream-thought and the memory-thought — other than a story about what’s “real”?
Is the certainty that “this happened” vs. “this didn’t” coming from direct experience — or from a mental tag, a judgment, a sense of familiarity?
Can you find any objective quality in experience that proves which is “real” and which is imagined?
I don’t think so. You’re right; there’s really no difference and it is like there’s a tag that says “imaginary” on the dream that alters the quality and style of the thoughts about the dream.
Can anything ever appear outside of now?
What is this made of — right now — without labelling it ‘memory’ or ‘dream’?
Strip away the interpretation. What’s actually left?
Nothing is outside of now.
Dreams and memories are made of thoughts that are given labels and judgements, but they are just imaginary. Without interpretation, there is nothing there. There’s no DE; just flickering imagery that very clearly changes every time I look. Just stories.