Re: Bring it on
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:06 am
Hello Patrick,
There are two overlapping ways of experiencing WHAT IS HERE.
Now answer this:
Get into the I control my experience mode.
How does that feel in your body?
How does your experience react when viewed from that perspective?
Get into the wierd and fuzzy way to experience mode.
How does that feel in your body?
How does your experience react when viewed from that perspective?
How does your body (aka sensing) react when you see this?
The way to be less attracted to this 'swept away' is to not make a big deal out of it when it appears.
On the contrary, when it appears there are not only the stories that are presented. There is also sensing and perceiving. You can focus on that too. Instead fo trying to step out from, try to dive in!
That's fine to me. The more I relax into it the more peace is present.
I am not talking about diving into stories. But diving into sensing and perceiving.
You may have trouble at work. (that the stories)
There is probalby a body reaction. (that the sensing) Dive into the sensing. try.
Instead of using "swept away" try to use the word "thinking is manifesting" or some variation of that.
Example: Meditative state are better than being at a boring work state.
This belief has 2 roots.
(A) There is another experience that this one that I am having
(B) The interpretation fo the mind about what is happening are real.
I am trying to point to you directly at these roots.
The mind's interpretation of this experience as an annoyance is the problem.
But is not like you there a choice of not being annoyed. BUT you can focus on the sensing of this annoyance and THAT is juicy.
There is always a sense of choice. But you never actually find the individual object that you are choosing from.
Hum that maybe to much at the moment.
Let's approach it that way.:
(A) Did you choose to like tacos or beans? Did you choose what you like and dislike in food? Did you choose to have the skill to get a kob that allow you to own a kitchen where you can cook?
My point is that you did not choose the condition from which you base your choices. And you were conditioned by your environment, parents, family friends, etc... and you chose none of them.
(B) You are ALWAYS limited in the option between which you choose.
(C) You have mostly no choice about what really matters. When we talk about choice it has to be choices that are meaningful. What is meaningful is what you feel mostly. Can you choose your emotion?
If you have a friend in jail saying to him that he can choose the color of the wall will probably not make him feeling free.
If your friend is ding of cancer saying to him that he can choose between eating a pizza or tacos would most probably not make him feel that he has a choice. Same for depression death, accident etc...
YES, this is it! Great, way to put it!But when breaking that down it starts to get a little weird and fuzzy. It's a false 'I' moving from label to label with assumption that the sensation felt 'in that area' is a fixed thing or noun being felt by the false 'I' centered in 'my' head 🙂
So wild to approach it like this, but have to admit I am getting a bit of the two worlds phenomenon where both options kinda makes sense. Of course I can move my attention from my toes to shoulder I just did it! VS. there are so many labels, approximations, and assumptions in that statement that it is absolutely meaningless.
There are two overlapping ways of experiencing WHAT IS HERE.
Now answer this:
Get into the I control my experience mode.
How does that feel in your body?
How does your experience react when viewed from that perspective?
Get into the wierd and fuzzy way to experience mode.
How does that feel in your body?
How does your experience react when viewed from that perspective?
YES, keep on that track.Yes I can see that now, how thinking is thinking, but I have never considered it like that before. Variations in intensity of thoughts makes it FEEL different but I can see how it is all thinking.
How does your body (aka sensing) react when you see this?
You are making a big deal about this "swept away". From what you are sharing being "swept away" is simply the human experience. Don't expect this to disappear. You may get more and more attracted to the presence and awareness over time.One world is presence and awareness of all that is coming into experience.
The other is being 'swept away' into a thought parade where 'I' am the hero of a scene or home movie, usually taking place in the future or the past, with some type of conflict that is being played out and I am completely intertwined with the 'I' and its struggles as if it is real and actually happening.
So I guess when I use that term 'swept away' its another way of saying how quickly and invisibly I am pulled into those future and past scenarios and get completely intertwined with the 'I'.
The way to be less attracted to this 'swept away' is to not make a big deal out of it when it appears.
On the contrary, when it appears there are not only the stories that are presented. There is also sensing and perceiving. You can focus on that too. Instead fo trying to step out from, try to dive in!
Most of my experience is being taken over by the false sense of "I".Yes its already weird to talk about it and use 'I' to describe being swept away, but it would also be weird to not talk about it that way because it does seem like awareness checks out and the false I just takes over for awhile, whether its for 10 seconds or a minute or whatever.
That's fine to me. The more I relax into it the more peace is present.
I am not talking about diving into stories. But diving into sensing and perceiving.
You may have trouble at work. (that the stories)
There is probalby a body reaction. (that the sensing) Dive into the sensing. try.
That is fantastic that you can see that both are trick of the mind. Perfect.It is both, but of course the negative thought parades feel more troublesome.
Catastrophizing over conflict with sister-in-law and playing out scenarios and what could happen if it all goes wrong.
Fantasizing about work projects being lauded and ensuing social validation where everything turns out roses.
There is a veracity and something believable about being "in" these thought parades, similar to a dream feeling real as it is happening, that probably contributes to me using the term 'swept away'.
Instead of using "swept away" try to use the word "thinking is manifesting" or some variation of that.
Well, there is a belief that some experiences are better and more valuable than others.A couple pages ago I was asking about our overall goal....are we exposing and uprooting the false self's hold on experience? You replied no, but there is still something there...somehow I am judging or separating or seeing those particular episodes as false and therefore they shouldn't be there. Kind of thinking out loud here but there is definitely something there.
Example: Meditative state are better than being at a boring work state.
This belief has 2 roots.
(A) There is another experience that this one that I am having
(B) The interpretation fo the mind about what is happening are real.
I am trying to point to you directly at these roots.
The hearing, the perceiving are juicy.Analogy that pops up for me while thinking about it....when being annoyed by a loud noise I never judge or question the hearing of it or perceiving of it, as if I should not have heard it.
The mind's interpretation of this experience as an annoyance is the problem.
But is not like you there a choice of not being annoyed. BUT you can focus on the sensing of this annoyance and THAT is juicy.
Like right now I'm deciding what to make for dinner. Being shaped by:
What I have in the kitchen: ingredients
What sounds good: what I've made lately, what I've eaten today
How much time I want to spend in kitchen: I want it to be fast and easy
How hungry I am: how much to make
It feels like I am going to cook what I want to eat based on all those factors, but I can also see how that is like saying the stream is deciding whether to turn right or left. So wild to think about it that way. All of the above factors feel so personal but they also have an 'I' at the heart of all of them.
But I do have a choice! I can either spend time making refried beans or not. In the past I've had these exact tacos and they tasted better with beans.
Are you saying that referencing the past and making a decision based on that memory is the equivalent of the water's trajectory being shaped by the mountain?
There is always a sense of choice. But you never actually find the individual object that you are choosing from.
Hum that maybe to much at the moment.
Let's approach it that way.:
(A) Did you choose to like tacos or beans? Did you choose what you like and dislike in food? Did you choose to have the skill to get a kob that allow you to own a kitchen where you can cook?
My point is that you did not choose the condition from which you base your choices. And you were conditioned by your environment, parents, family friends, etc... and you chose none of them.
(B) You are ALWAYS limited in the option between which you choose.
(C) You have mostly no choice about what really matters. When we talk about choice it has to be choices that are meaningful. What is meaningful is what you feel mostly. Can you choose your emotion?
If you have a friend in jail saying to him that he can choose the color of the wall will probably not make him feeling free.
If your friend is ding of cancer saying to him that he can choose between eating a pizza or tacos would most probably not make him feel that he has a choice. Same for depression death, accident etc...