Dear Sulochani
. It seems that thoughts ABOUT I cannot make a self appear. A thought can arise, ‘I’m no good at this’, ‘I don’t belong here’ but then, there is no ‘I’ to hang this onto.
It's good to see this. Yes. It seems that no amount of hunting around will uncover a "separate" entity, or self that is separate from whatever is experienced.
. . A thought can arise, ‘I’m no good at this’, ‘I don’t belong here’ but then, there is no ‘I’ to hang this onto. So a thought can come and even linger for a while and cause some emotions to arise but they pass. They can’t hang around because they are not based on anything substantial. The cycle of suffering -of being a victim because someone has done something to ‘me’ - is seen more clearly and that brings a sense of freedom
Yes. Very true. Thoughts can definitely appear and reference "I" but as you say, there's nothing substantial when the illusion is seen.
Is there any reason why seeing no entity should prevent these thoughts and feelings from appearing though?
What if such thoughts and feelings, rooted in a confused perspective, are actually telling us something? That perhaps some long-held belief and feeling needs looking at, even though there never actually was a separate entity (poor little me) to whom they happened?
Do you feel that It might not be such a good idea to make a habit of bypassing or ignoring such feelings via the intellectualisation that 'there's no me so there's no-one to experience suffering'? (I only mention this because it can sometimes happen) .
. It’s funny and yet so all-consuming when this suffering is felt and experienced. I have read this many times but to actually look and just find spaciousness and no little bumps, grooves or knots feels quite different.
Yes it does.
. To be honest, not sure if I get what you mean Jon but I’ll share what happens – looking at a small white jug.
OK. Ler me explain, because it's not about perceiving a 'separate object' as such. It's not about you and a jug.
It just happens that a lot of crockery is white, But it could easily have been a red cup or an orange or a green bedspread. It's about seeing colour.
It's, about how seeing colour is experienced, regardless of any apparent object to which colour might seem to be a secondary attachment or 'coating' . Forget the idea that coloured things are "things" coated in colour.
Find something with a single colour and simply notice the colour.
I'm looking now at a red cushion but the cushion shape is unimportant . There is a common belief that there is a 'perceiver' (that 'sees'), some thing,or quality, that is 'perceived' ('seen' ) and 'perception' ('seeing').
Right here and now, seeing redness, explore what's happening. Is the experience 'redness' separate from the seeing of it?
Is there an experience of 'awareness perceiving redness' or just redness?
Love
Jon