Re: Guidance requested.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:42 pm
Im going to let that settle in for a bit this morning.
Will reply shortly.
Thanks Chris
Will reply shortly.
Thanks Chris
Liberation Unleashed Forum The Gate
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/viewtopic.php?t=1615
A story you currently believe.Understandable. I try not to make it a habit to respond unless there is a response within me. These contemplations take time.
A story you currently believe.I am stuck at the point of the witness. I beleive I am the witness because I have yet to imbue a perspective that "shows" me otherwise. At some point, this has to become about shifting perspectives. Actions from the believed perspective of a person prolonges suffering, whereas actions from the perspective of space and presence do the opposite. Why else are we here if not to shift?
A story you currently believe.I understand that this website promotes a no bs approach to passing thru the gate, but I have to be met where I am at in order to see it for what it is and then go beyond it. (pardon the imagery).
You are defending your current beliefs instead of getting this done. What are you trying to protect? What you say is based on beliefs and assumptions. For example: "there is a paradigm shift required in order for me to stop believing in my self as a person". How do you know that this is a true statement?I am always looking directly when I report back to you, but there is a paradigm shift required in order for me to stop believing in my self as a person.
You are stuck because you assume that a perspective shift where the sense of self disappears is the point of this inquiry. You are not looking at the gate, you are distracted by this assumption.There is zero defense occurring, there is nothing I am protecting. I am ready, I am just "stuck".
You don't exist. You are just another one of those ideas/beliefs.So if all of my ideas of witness's, being stuck, paradigms etc...are all just beliefs, than where does that leave me?
You are doing no such thing, you do not exist. There is sitting and typing and reading. There is no you doing them.I am sitting on my couch typing and reading these words.
Is the idea of "myself" more than a fleeting thought? Is "local" just a thought? Is "personal" just a thought? Do these thoughts accurately describe what's going on or do they create a sense of self? If there is no thought occurring, do you exist? If there is no thought, does a sense of self exist? Check in your direct experience. Don't think about it and try to reason it out, just observe how experience actually plays out.There is a sense of self attached to this action of course, but I can't say that this experience is saturated with ego or personhood. But I am of course writing from the seeker...I can feel this. But if I look directly, no seeker can be found. I see this clearly. This seeing leaves me with only a sense of presence, but it still feels local and personal...like this idea of myself is present...and I'm not just Presence...or whatever...
Lets please focus on this, for I am "certain" from my current perspective, that "I"..( whatever that is) am doing the reading and writing...There is sitting and typing and reading. There is no you doing them.
Is there actually a "me who is reading", or is it just a thought? Closely observe the process with anything you can think of. Thoughts, actions, etc. and see if there is a me doing them.I just observed that comprehension happens almost before i consciously realize it... Its like, the "me who is reading", is riding on the back of the otherwise timeless comprehension that is occuring...
It's not about denouncing to possibility of the doer, but seeing if you can actually find one.Like some of your previous posts, im trying to allow them to soak into my everyday experiences. Now that im feeling better I will be examining my direct experiences as closely as possible to see if I can find anyone there. Its an alien concept of course...but I suppose after a while this new "stance" of denouncing any possible "doer" of actions will eventually become the locust of my awareness/focus?
Do you consciously orchestrate the movement of the muscles required to move your hand from point A to point B? And where did the idea to move your hand from point A to point B come form in the first place?And while I'm thinking about this, one catching point for me is volition. To me...volition is like an actionable awareness of sorts. Through volition I move my hand from point A to point B. So within those mechanisms, there is volition as directed by this I-ness in order to accomplish some goal. Ive read that all actions are like the falling of leaves from trees, its just natural and happening. But I still feel like "I"...thru volition, am responsible for moving my hand from point A to point B.