Re: Looking For A Guide
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:29 pm
When seen from the context of No “I” - there is freedom.Is there I
Liberation Unleashed Forum The Gate
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/viewtopic.php?t=6384
When seen from the context of No “I” - there is freedom.Is there I
Acknowledge the fear, inwardly thank it for doing its job. It is protection mechanism from unknown. It's just a sensation. Next time you look at if there is an 'I' when fear arises look at fear and just let it be here. Respect it. Bow to it. Then look what is behind fear.Initially there is fear. Fear of letting go of ownership of the thoughts. Fear of a (false) loss of control, of a (false, unwanted, yet comfortable sense of identity).
If you are still close to nature here is something for you to play with:Right now ‘I’ am sitting in the woods. When looking at the trees if the thought “seeing if happening” is maintained, there is a freedom, a relaxation, a release of tension. Suddenly nothing seems personal and beauty is seen with a new clarity. There is a curiosity instead of a fear.
Yes, great looking... direct experience or actual experience of 'thinking is happening' 'seeing happening' 'action happening' etc. is real and the more you notice it the more you will see that it is not happening to 'someone' separate from life.Please let me know if this is on the right track. “I” may have questions.
Hi Alina,Can you find the line where you ends and out there begins? Is there a separate being that moves independently? Or everything moves as one unified energy? Is there inside and outside the movement?
Yes. They feel like it they are. Intellectually it is all very clear and evident. But it is usually not something I can feel all the time. I am in need of help of how to feel it more than an occasional glimmer. If I’m even looking in the right direction. It feels more like the truth though. Here’s what I can feel:Are thoughts and feelings part of the movement of totality?
Yes. It’s all interconnected. It’s part of the whole but hard to put into words.Is this body part of the whole movement?
I am starting to think there is nothing behind fear besides the program running in the background that starts it. Thoughts trigger feelings and sensations. This triggers more thoughts; all escalating to more and more fear. Usually over something nameless. Its stimulus response mechanism that is out of control and hence not useful.Then look what is behind fear.
Wonderful you are doing a great job... let the expectations be, just let them be without giving your attention or energy to them.I am surrendering without expectation. The mind runs its software script of expectations. Language also seems to build expectations. I am trying to feel, but not mentally label.
Let those days just be as they are, where your attention goes life flows. Wanting things to be otherwise attracts more of the same. Would resistance to what is be the way life operates? Would life resist its own manifestation in the moment? Imagine you walk and there is a pond on your path would you resist its being there because you can no longer continue walking straight. Would the sky resist rainy days? See what happening when resistance arises, what is the root thought that activates it?The boundaries start dissolving though its subtle and some days so very clear and evident; while other days it’s as if I am so far away from seeing the truth that I don’t even remember there is anything besides body/mind. On those days the thoughts seem to be fascinated by themselves.
Do you think there is nothing, or do you SEE nothing? How does this nothing sound, look or feel? Is it a silence before the mind kicks in with stories. So keep asking and looking, is there I?I am starting to think there is nothing behind fear besides the program running in the background that starts it.
During your next walk in nature, please have a look!There is a somewhat felt boundary when I insert myself into the movement and yet ‘I’ know there shouldn’t be.
No - that is an excellent point.Would life resist its own manifestation in the moment?
The thought that actives it is an immediate “NO.” The resistance is felt throughout my entire body. It is angry and the base of the NO is fear.See what happening when resistance arises, what is the root thought that activates it?
I can’t see one at all. It is purely imagination. There is zero evidence to suggest anything other than - all boundaries, felt senses and perceptions are anywhere other than - (for lack of a better term) - from “inside.” The assumption that there are boundaries are just history and mental programming. The problem is that it is so habitual to see things as separate and believe in an imaginary boundary.Where exactly do you SEE a boundary?
I want you to STOP now and LOOK at what is here now."The problem is that it is so habitual to see things as separate and believe in an imaginary boundary. "
In actual direct experience, there is no habit, it is just pure perception. It is at the moment that a label is assigned to the perception that the boundary seems to begin. For example: when seeing “white and soft” there is no boundary. It is just perception, but seeing “white and soft blanket” there is a boundary that seems to get set up as “other” with the assignment of the label “blanket.”What is it in actual experience, that has that habit?
NothingWhat is it in actual experience, that has that habit?
I don’t know. No - but I cannot see it clearly.Can a thought have a habit?
It would seem that “the habit” is just a random running of the script of attached thoughts belonging to nothing, but that the “I” has claimed ownership of.What has this habit?
Nothing is separate, awareness alone cannot be, it can only be aware of whatever it is aware of. The same way the other way around nothing could be without the awareness of its direct existence... there is no two. Now that being said being stuck for most of our life in the content of awareness it is freeing to pull back and temporary disconnect to start seeing more clearly from the uninvolved awareness or actual experience view. So in the light of our uninvolved presence awareing noticing starts to happen and liberation of conditioned thinking and identifications loosen up, deconstruct and no longer needed for functioning to continue to happen from a more aware free space.My question then is - what is it in actuality that I love, or have compassion for in others (or in myself)?
Since I am moving towards an understanding that there really is no self, is it strange or odd to love the no-self or the gross accumulation of thoughts and sensations that make up people? It seems silly to empathize with their suffering if there is nothing that suffers.
Life living itself has a very strange sense of humor. It has exhausted this body-mind and it is difficult to see it as not personal in the sense that this “me” experience seems to be tuned in to one very specific type of experience or “life”, one of grave difficulties. As I look at the conditioning and programming that go into the choices, responses and filters of this body-mind, only some of it is explainable. Random happenstance outside of preprogrammed processes that threaten survival feel personal, and feel as if they are generated from “outside.” Yet that technically makes no sense as I no longer am sure if there is an “outside.” Is there an “outside”?Nobody is living life, life is living life
A looker and a seer - no, I don’t think so. I think there is no separation between the act of seeing and the seen. As to the understander, I understand (just kidding) that things are experienced through a set of conditioned filters that create understanding that fits within the programmed condition. So no, there is no understander. Sorry if that’s confusing.[Is there] A looker, A see-er? An understander?
Yes, there are moments when this happens. The staged play is seen for what it is and there is a sudden desire to experience all, good or bad as fully as possible. Those moments, though few, are beautiful.The personality might become even more original and authentic / true / unreserved and undamaged...in other words free.
There is direct experience. After that there is direct experience with stories and conditionings layered on top of it. But right now, (and until the layers get addded on), there is only sense perception/ direct experience.What is here now?
Beautiful!There is direct experience. After that there is direct experience with stories and conditionings layered on top of it. But right now, (and until the layers get addded on), there is only sense perception/ direct experience.
And can 'I wish this happened more' be allowed in direct experience too, without resistance of the moment to be different than it already is?Yes, there are moments when this happens. The staged play is seen for what it is and there is a sudden desire to experience all, good or bad as fully as possible. Those moments, though few, are beautiful.
I wish this happened more.
It is clear, most definitely. It is more clear on some days than on others. It is when I lose direct experience of sensations and perceptions that are detached from thoughts, that I am most tied up in the belief of the conditionings. It is the thought-feeling cycle that gains momentum and drags me into it creating an ego and a self.If it is clear that "I" is just a thought like any other.
If it is clear the there is no ego besides a thought about it.
If it is clear that the person you seem to be does not exist apart from a thought about it.
This is a truly excellent point. I had to read it a few times to let it settle but once it did - yes it can, and it is something I am really enjoying. For some reason this point really helps shift things for me.And can ‘I wish this happened more’ be allowed in direct experience too, without resistance of the moment to be different than it already is?
This question is giving me difficulty. I need help on this. It is the idea that thoughts/actions/ will comes up on its own as the software. I think that sometimes the software or the action or the thought does alter the present moment. But I’m not sure. I’m having some confusion with it.Is the a controller of the present moment? Can a controller be found?
.It is when I lose direct experience of sensations and perceptions that are detached from thoughts, that I am most tied up in the belief of the conditionings. It is the thought-feeling cycle that gains momentum and drags me into it creating an ego and a self
What this 'me' look like? What colour is it? What makes it real? What is an ego/self look like? Is it really real, or there are sensations like contraction happening? Could it be just another belief we give our attention to? Can you describe how ego is experienced?and drags me into it creating an ego
Are thoughts/actions a part of the moment as it appears, or are they something separate? Where do you SEE a separation? Is there a controller of thoughts/actions?It is the idea that thoughts/actions/ will comes up on its own as the software. I think that sometimes the software or the action or the thought does alter the present moment.
This is a truly excellent point. I had to read it a few times to let it settle but once it did - yes it can, and it is something I am really enjoying. For some reason this point really helps shift things for me.