Thank you for your answers.
Okay, I'll wait.I'll get to your second round of questions soon!
With love,
C
Okay, I'll wait.I'll get to your second round of questions soon!
No! I don't believe every thought that pops up, and lots of them aren't accurate, so, well, you got me there.Do you believe every thought that pops up? Or there are thoughts that you know aren't accurate, aren't real?
This strikes me enormously this morning. I'd read it but not let it in. I realise that what I've been doing so far is precisely trying to change the thinking with the help of ... thoughts. This was bound to leave me chasing after my tail, wasn't it? Brilliant. I feel relieved.It's the thinking that creates the illusion and we aren't trying to change the thinking, so you have to use other tool, the senses.
Yes!This strikes me enormously this morning. I'd read it but not let it in. I realise that what I've been doing so far is precisely trying to change the thinking with the help of ... thoughts. This was bound to leave me chasing after my tail, wasn't it? Brilliant. I feel relieved.
Yes.However, when using the senses, it's difficult not to interpret instantly. I suppose that if we're not trying to change the thinking, it's not about inhibiting the interpretation either.
Are you talking about making connections, linking this to that? Is this done with thinking also?One way I see around the usual habits is to look out for the flow rather than specific separated objects. Even including thoughts and emotions as part of the flow and surrendering to the way they are all intertwined, "me" having nothing to do with it.
How do you now there is still a me? Can you have a look and describe this me?I find it increasingly easy to look at life that way. Instantly, a great weight falls off, maybe the weight of being someone according to certain rules and aspirations and duties. It's like the tale about me is gone and I am free to be completely here and now. I don't need to control my environment so much. There is still a me, though! but it's not pre-defined. It's new somehow. Also vague and thinner, like a smoky ghost.
Okay, thank you for letting me know.Thank you Canfora. I am travelling far tomorrow, and will reconnect with the conversation as soon as possible.
I'm in Portugal. A storm is passing by at the time being - the wind is blowing dramatically! - but we have mild winters. Where are you?I hope you keep warm, wherever you are.
Are you talking about making connections, linking this to that? Is this done with thinking also?One way I see around the usual habits is to look out for the flow rather than specific separated objects. Even including thoughts and emotions as part of the flow and surrendering to the way they are all intertwined, "me" having nothing to do with it.
No, it's not thinking, it's just observing what is in my field of vision/sensation/emotion and noticing how it comes and goes in a sort of complex dance. A bit like watching a stream and seeing water, seaweeds, sand, etc moving together. I don't claim any part of it as 'mine'. They just are.What do you mean by "to look out for the flow"?
That made me laugh. The only thing I could see was an EFFORT. The effort of keeping it all together in a coherent way. 'Me' is a tension! Wow. I find that really funny.How do you now there is still a me? Can you have a look and describe this me?There is still a me, though! but it's not pre-defined. It's new somehow. Also vague and thinner, like a smoky ghost.
Brrr... :)
Portugal, wow! I'm in Canada, it's freezing... I love that cold.
Can you describe what you can observe right now? Just so that I make sure we mean the same thing when we talk about observing.No, it's not thinking, it's just observing what is in my field of vision/sensation/emotion and noticing how it comes and goes in a sort of complex dance. A bit like watching a stream and seeing water, seaweeds, sand, etc moving together. I don't claim any part of it as 'mine'. They just are.
Yes.we're not putting in question the fact that there are thoughts, memories, beliefs, etc.
Yes, we can say that.That made me laugh. The only thing I could see was an EFFORT. The effort of keeping it all together in a coherent way. 'Me' is a tension! Wow. I find that really funny.
I'm not sure if I understand what you are saying above. Can you say more and give some practical examples please?We're putting into question the existence of a glue that holds that stuff in one whole. There is no such glue, that's very obvious now.
Me too.I'm extremely grateful for this dialogue.
The old fridge makes noise. The room is dark, but there's a light in the passageway and a small christmas tree. There is the sensation of tiredness and a bit of hunger. Confused thoughts, some sadness, the sound of cars in the street, the computer very bright. All that together forms an atmosphere that I observe without having created any of it and without owning any of it. It is just a unique melting pot of sensations/thoughts/emotions. The hands typing and the mind telling the words to type seem detached from a will.Can you describe what you can observe right now? Just so that I make sure we mean the same thing when we talk about observing.
Ok. Let's say that all the memories/thoughts/situations are like thousands of fish swimming in the sea, and we try to catch them all together in an imaginary net, to pretend they have one coherent shape called 'me' that can be controlled, known, talked about, manipulated. Then the net becomes the centre of attention and we forget it has been created by the imagination.I'm not sure if I understand what you are saying above. Can you say more and give some practical examples please?We're putting into question the existence of a glue that holds that stuff in one whole. There is no such glue, that's very obvious now.
What is observing all this? Can you find a observer if you look for it?The old fridge makes noise. The room is dark, but there's a light in the passageway and a small christmas tree. There is the sensation of tiredness and a bit of hunger. Confused thoughts, some sadness, the sound of cars in the street, the computer very bright. All that together forms an atmosphere that I observe without having created any of it and without owning any of it. It is just a unique melting pot of sensations/thoughts/emotions. The hands typing and the mind telling the words to type seem detached from a will.
What is the "we" you talk about? What forgets?Ok. Let's say that all the memories/thoughts/situations are like thousands of fish swimming in the sea, and we try to catch them all together in an imaginary net, to pretend they have one coherent shape called 'me' that can be controlled, known, talked about, manipulated. Then the net becomes the centre of attention and we forget it has been created by the imagination.
No observer, no. No entity. But there is consciousness. There is a presence quietly sensing, noticing.What is observing all this? Can you find a observer if you look for it?
It was meant as a "we, human beings". That's really interesting, it was a totally absurd statement: "We" forget that "we" don't exist.What is the "we" you talk about? What forgets?Then the net becomes the centre of attention and we forget it has been created by the imagination.
No. I see the veil of the usual default position ('I am a subject'). It seems to absorb all the info, analyse it and make decisions. But it's flimsy, it's not tangible, just a concept. (A strong concept!!)Have a look. Can you see the thing(s), the subject(s), these words imply must exist?
Still difficult, as you may have noticed, to do without the why's and how's. Are those questions typically powered by a 'me' centered mind?Forget the why's and how's. Look. Do you see a you?
Which 'me' centered mind? Can you find such a thing if you look for it? :)Are those questions typically powered by a 'me' centered mind?
I agree alheartdelly that this season is hectic!this is just to say that our conversation is very close to my heart, but I'm struggling to find the right time to answer. Christmas is always a very hectic family visit.
No. There's just a series of thoughts and a strong thought pattern leading back to the idea of 'me'.Which 'me' centered mind? Can you find such a thing if you look for it? :)Are those questions typically powered by a 'me' centered mind?
Now, there is this silent bedroom. The walls are blue. It's a bit cold tonight. There's a sore throat... tiredness. It's easy to see it all without automatically attaching stories to every element of it. (Like: I love my bedroom, it's too late, I should be in bed, I caught a virus on the plane as always.)So, what do you see? What is being experienced? Can you describe what is happening now that you are aware of? What is happening that is not a story?
I remember that I've also spent some time looking and looking (maybe some months) just to be sure :)How come there is a need to remember to reposition the seeing? I read "once it is seen it can't be unseen". Here, it feels like it needs to be seen again and again. (Although it gets easier and easier.)
Yes. Old habits (may) take time to be seen through. This is a kind of a beginning, with no end in sight.Is that just part of the erosion process?
I wonder if you expect to not feel attraction for things that relate to you? Why wouldn't you feel that?To be really honest, this isn't a huge shift; it's more like something I already knew just sank in and is now dissolving old patterns. But then again, there is still a very strong habit of identifying with feelings, of reacting to events, of trying to fit in a coherent tale. There is still that attraction for things that relate to 'me'. I notice it, though, and it is possible to step back and dissolve again the bond with those feelings/reactions/tale/attraction. (I say "I notice it" because the sentence needs a pronoun. "It is being spontaneously noticed", let, say -- a bit heavy.)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests