Please excuse my use of I, as I must use it to communicate clearly, but it adds many inaccuracies which I hope you'll navigate through fine.And if I may, John, do you 'think' you don't exist, or 'see' you don't exist. There's a difference, and your last sentence confused me a bit, to be honest. So you have 3 questions now.This all is great scaffolding, and last night thought really had a breakthrough, but thinking thinks more thoughts need to be thought to better cement this whole non-idea. Everything thinking has thought of so far has held up joyously, though.
I guess I mean to say that I still can't believe this actually worked. I keep reading the thread over, picking at the perceived holes in the progression, and it just keeps cementing itself.
To be honest, I guess the fact that I still feel the need to reinforce this non-knowledge means that I haven't really seen that I don't exist, though I certainly think and now believe that I don't exist.
I could write "I can't see if I don't exist because there's no one around to do the seeing!" ...but I don't really see that, that's just logic at work.
...but how can I write that and not 'see' it? Or do I already 'see' it and just have to realize that I already 'see' it?
I definitely thought I got it sometime between my post with the picture and the next. I can describe what that felt like, if it'd mean anything to you.
I feel like I'm straddling two planes of existence. I need one last push!

