Re: Aftershock
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2026 12:12 pm
I am following you but am not in love with the screen analogy because though I know you are not talking about an “I” who owns experience the structure of it makes it seem like that which is aware of the screen is separate and distinct from the screen itself. In that way it is a bit messy. But I am satisfied that you are describing an illusion that is always an illusion and does not actually come and go, but only appears to.
Did the illusion, the ‘me’ ever exist?
What exactly disappears at that cliff?
What is absent there that is present in the I-am?
Just take a look. This would be on a very subtle level.
Ultimately could the recognition of finding something prior to the personal self be enough? Must it be ‘defined’? (Perhaps you are the explorer to do this… ‘I’ certainly cannot take a position on that lol)
Did the illusion, the ‘me’ ever exist?
That is a very precise observation.I-am is still intimate and has the fragrance of me-ness, while the awareness of it is the cliff where me-ness disappears.
What exactly disappears at that cliff?
What is absent there that is present in the I-am?
Just take a look. This would be on a very subtle level.
Ultimately could the recognition of finding something prior to the personal self be enough? Must it be ‘defined’? (Perhaps you are the explorer to do this… ‘I’ certainly cannot take a position on that lol)