By itself, what is there?.... doorknob (when I say doorknob, I mean what the label doorknob refers to). But is there seeing of the doorknob? Is the doorknob being seen? Does the doorknob appear? IS the doorknob??
Hmm, I'm still unclear. Maybe it just appears? I can't actually verify with DE experience that it exists prior to seeing it (even if I have seen it a million times before). I don't think it appears out of nothing but that is just a thought founded in logic.
Questions arose this morning - Why do we even have thoughts? Are they designed just to be used for creating or problem-solving on a very practical level that only involves DE issues? (such as, someone had the thought that if a person is unable to see well, they worked on how to improve that function by creating glasses) Other animals don’t seem to “think” so why have we been designed to? The other DE functions seem to be to help navigate the body in this physical form but why do humans have thoughts but the other animals don't? Some content of thought seems to be useful and accurate. Anyway, my mind is likely trying to validate itself - haha.
Sure, a tree is fine. A lot of people have found staring at their face in the mirror interesting.
I've really noticed how challenging this exercise actually is. The attention on just the tree seems to last about 10 seconds before thoughts just come and distract me. It feels easier to close my eyes and imagine the tree - haha, probably because the image is then a thought content and NOT the actual tree being seen. I was able to do it the first few days a little easier I think because I would use the word "rest" to bring my focus back but I'm realizing it really was based in the intention of using the time to rest instead of engaging in a challenging practice. I guess just looking at a tree feels like a practice. That causes sadness because I would like to really "SEE" the tree for what it is and if I did I doubt it would be challenging to sit with it for hours. Thoughts, thoughts, more analyzing thoughts!