With pleasure! This weekend is ok, preferably not in the middle of the day, mornings or late afternoon would be fine. I don’t want to sound picky - it’s just I’m on holiday and will be coming back on Monday. And usually I’m engaged in some activities with my husband during the day, and some spontaneous activities may pop up.
Be as picky as you want 😂. This weekend morning (your time) works for me, it's GMT+8 here. Is Saturday or Sunday better for you? Next weekend is fine too. Email me at
27leetyler@gmail.com so we can schedule
As I’m sitting now - there’s awareness of the body, of the wind, of seeing, hearing, touching etc. If awareness is of the body it cannot be in the body - can it? But if the awareness is outside of the body- I should be able to feel or see from the perspective of something or somebody else. Why the centrality, where does it come from? But that’s maybe too much thinking right now…
This is a trick language plays on us. What's the difference between "there are sensations" and "there is awareness of sensations"? Don't they describe the same experience of just sensations? Language can make it seem like there's a thing called "awareness" that is separate from experience, but is this anything more than a figure of speech? Where is "awareness of sensations", apart from the sensations themselves? There are even many famous teachers on Youtube who are under this impression 😂😂
You describe experiencing "from the body" as if sensations are not experienced on the same level as sights, sounds, etc.. That sense of "centrality" or "in here VS out there" is very interesting. What makes a sensation "in here" and an image "out there"?
Here's some bits of a conversation I had with someone else:
[24/09, 08:47] ty: what are you looking for when you ask the question "who?"
[24/09, 08:49] Jordan M: At this point, I don't feel I'm looking at all, and not in an intentional "don't seek" way. The answers that come are just more stuff.
[24/09, 08:50] Jordan M: "I am" does come. And it doesn't feel like it needs any extra questioning. I just am.
[24/09, 08:51] Jordan M: I tune to the senses. And just sit. I get caught in stories again. And then just come back. But I do still feel identified with something.
[24/09, 10:50] ty: what does the "i" in "i am" refer to
[24/09, 11:08] Jordan M: The sense of self. The sense of what is experiencing reality. Not even "self". Maybe the awareness of what is happening moment to moment
[24/09, 11:15] Jordan M: Which also starts to feel like a concept or label when my mind tries to figure out what the hell it is
[24/09, 11:29] Jordan M: I could say "that which is unchanging, ever present". Reality itself. I can feel the edges of that. There is still alot of mind identification in my day to day though
[24/09, 11:32] ty: what awareness?
[24/09, 11:32] ty: what's unchanging and ever present?
[24/09, 11:33] ty: dont you have to refer to memories of the past and decide that whatever this is was there then, as well as now?
[24/09, 11:34] ty: is this not just you believing thoughts about the past and time then concluding that there's something moving through time that was there "then" (because you can remember "then"), and is going to be there "later"?
[24/09, 11:35] Jordan M: Ah shit man 🤣
[24/09, 11:35] Jordan M: Got me cracking up. Yes!
[24/09, 11:35] ty: 😂😂
[24/09, 11:36] ty: when you look "now", and suspend your belief in the past/time, wtf is awareness?
[24/09, 11:36] Jordan M: It's a thought!
[24/09, 11:36] ty: yeah
[24/09, 11:36] Jordan M: Shiiiiiiit
[24/09, 11:38] Jordan M: It's always here. Cause it can't be anywhere else. Cause there's nowhere else. I see myself going into concept again now.
------------------------------------------------------
[25/09, 07:12] Jordan: So those last messages seemed to have landed well. Something about "experientially all there are are the senses and thought which aren't really separate" seems to have struck home.
[25/09, 07:12] Jordan: I don't think Ive ever heard it like that.
[25/09, 07:13] Jordan: Words are not exactly working for this
[25/09, 07:14] Jordan: Experience? I guess. That doesn't seem right.
[25/09, 07:14] Jordan: Who would experience it
[25/09, 07:28] ty: what who
[25/09, 07:28] ty: you may get the feeling that theres a subject (you) experiencing objects (experience) because language forces us to think that way
[25/09, 07:29] ty: but isnt any subject you can pinpoint in experience an "object" in experience?
[25/09, 07:30] ty: experientially theres no subject, only the thought of a subject, the thought of a "who". and is this thought not another object within experience?
[25/09, 07:30] ty: what more is "I" than a figure of speech?