Re: Having moments of liberation - wanting more!
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2023 12:32 am
Thank you for the exercise Henri! I enjoyed it!
My initial experience was that the “I am” label was exhausting especially as I was trying to label everything and there are a lot of things going on to label! I’m not sure if that was linguistically or otherwise, but it was just so much more peaceful and effortless to notice the flow of activity (seeing, thinking, sensing) without the I am label.
1. Is one truer than the other, and If so, which one?
It seems more accurate to just notice “driving” rather than “I am driving.” What I found was that I was driving or looking or thinking without any initiation from a “me” - it was just happening. I didn’t even choose where I was looking. Something would “catch my eye,” such as motion or color. There was no I choosing to look before the looking happened.
I notice my mind popping up with a thought- wondering if I’m just giving you the “right” answer - but it really did seem experientially true that all of the actions happened without forethought from an I.
2. What is here without labels?
If I understand the question (what is here without the I label) - I’d say that what is present without the “I” label is just consciousness, witnessing life through the vehicle of this specific body.
3. Do labels affect the experience or just describe it?
The I label absolutely changes the experience. Without the label, there is a peaceful, passive awareness simply watching life unfurl. With the I, there is a sense of active doing / controlling of the experience. For example, I never was so clear about the fact that I do not choose where I look. It just happens. I do not choose the next thing my body does, it just happens. It is clearer that the “control” over all of that is an illusion.
4. Did you notice any differences in the body?
I definitely had a sense of greater relaxation in the second mode without the I label. It was lighter to just watch and allow whatever was there.
My initial experience was that the “I am” label was exhausting especially as I was trying to label everything and there are a lot of things going on to label! I’m not sure if that was linguistically or otherwise, but it was just so much more peaceful and effortless to notice the flow of activity (seeing, thinking, sensing) without the I am label.
1. Is one truer than the other, and If so, which one?
It seems more accurate to just notice “driving” rather than “I am driving.” What I found was that I was driving or looking or thinking without any initiation from a “me” - it was just happening. I didn’t even choose where I was looking. Something would “catch my eye,” such as motion or color. There was no I choosing to look before the looking happened.
I notice my mind popping up with a thought- wondering if I’m just giving you the “right” answer - but it really did seem experientially true that all of the actions happened without forethought from an I.
2. What is here without labels?
If I understand the question (what is here without the I label) - I’d say that what is present without the “I” label is just consciousness, witnessing life through the vehicle of this specific body.
3. Do labels affect the experience or just describe it?
The I label absolutely changes the experience. Without the label, there is a peaceful, passive awareness simply watching life unfurl. With the I, there is a sense of active doing / controlling of the experience. For example, I never was so clear about the fact that I do not choose where I look. It just happens. I do not choose the next thing my body does, it just happens. It is clearer that the “control” over all of that is an illusion.
4. Did you notice any differences in the body?
I definitely had a sense of greater relaxation in the second mode without the I label. It was lighter to just watch and allow whatever was there.
