I put this back to you... Who does the thinking? LOOK. What do you find?You said: Yes Cailin, the I is not only an imposter, its just another thought in the head, just like any other thought.
And thoughts themselves cannot think.
I say: I agree and this begs the question, who DOES do the thinking? Not the usualy worried perseveration on issues that seem to need to be handled. Insights: In whose mind do they occur so that this figmentory me can then share them?
PS: if you see LOOK on here, what we mean is to use all your senses.
stay out of conceptual thinking.
LOOKING is how we can see that the I is not real.
LOOKING comes before the labeling of something as good, bad, indifferent
before any conceptual conclusion.
you could call it pure seeing of what's here right now.
This is what we're going for.
What if there is just nothing?YOU say: Not sure about a 'real' self....sounds like another version of an I.
There's no I that can be found. not now. not yesterday. not tomorrow.
The reason? Its not really there!
Many have read that little koan of Ilona's and actually had a startling discovery.
I say: I agree, I can't find me either but neither can I find "nothing". When I meditate there is definitely still a witness to the nothing. So long as there is some manner of awareness, it's not "nothing".
what if its been your 'self' you've been looking from all this time?
Do you see the confusion above? "the character that appears as "me" is not real. To function here, I have had to make some weird adjustments that have left me"As for Ilona's gem, I can see why it works for many as it cut thru quite a bit of mind prattle for me as well. Today, I feel much less bothered about all the pointless suffering in life. The "loss" of characters I loved no longer worries/grieves me. "Loss" is no more real that the characters themselves were. Nothing real can be threatened. In fact I had quite the seizure of laughter mixed with crying in the shower last night after I read Ilona's gem. My sad story I was telling my self was ridiculous and I seemed to step out of it. But this happens to me all the time: I'm disidentified with this dream and at peace, and then I lose my wah and become emotionally attached. Then someone else dies. It's as if I am being enured to the visage so I will see thru it. I'm vascillating between perspectives and I am here having this exchange with your gracious presence because I want the frame of reference to stabilize. It's the back and forth that is uncomfortable now, not the dream.
Does this make sense? That NDE only made me much more certain this life is but a dream and that the character that appears as "me" is not real. To function here, I have had to make some weird adjustments that have left me in a borderland, shifting back and forth. Sometimes, things here are so beautiful and vivid, even "sacred". Other times they are all just verbal objects in mind space: props.
Is there really an I and a me?
Look hard at this one...
Is there two or one or even none?
Very nice...I can see its left some amazing insights the rest of us can only really wonder about.You said (regarding my nde): Cailin, to me it appeared that way. You wrote quite a bit describing it all the first post.
It appeared dominant. I have been told by a very good source that people who have had NDE do get quite identified with it.
I say: Here is my only issue: Body was dying. I was perfect and changed. I was disoriented and there was someone there to help orient me. I didn't tell you much about it as it contained a lot of revelation. But it was 33 years ago and I have found it "not applicable" to this world, so I have, mostly, left it behind. However, in terms of this discussion, it is presenting one issue to be reconciled. While I was "dead" I still was, but I was not separate from the Being that was there reorienting me. We were one. So I can see where this little personna goes away as a separate point of awareness, but the experience I had was that death unites all consciousness within it. That is, the body appears to be a sort of reducing valve that creates the figment of separate existance. But enough of all that. Let's move in, as you say...
Maybe turn them off for a short while...YOU said: So we've looked at thoughts.
you don't own them, they come and go, can't predict them.
We are not in control of them we could say.
I say: Agreed, but we can turn them off, can we not? More and more in meditation, they go away for me.
but that's not tanatamount to ultimate control.
Once we get done meditating... the thoughts are back, uncontrolled.
Very nice Cailin, you're doing some great looking!YOU say: Lets look at the body and see if there is an owner or entity controlling it.
Lift up one of your hands. either one.
Move it to the right. Now move it left. Look with your eyes what is happening.
Did a self move the hand?
Or did the hand just move?
Direct observation. Move it again. Check it.
Which is more true, the hand moved, or a self moved the hand?
I Say: I have noticed this autopilot effect almost all my life. I sleep walk and sleep talk and am, reportedly, quite lucid while doing so and yet have no memory of it later. It's pretty obvious "I" am not much in charge. Even right after I came back from my NDE, it was very apparent that "I" was not making my body move. I was not even conscious and yet I was on my feet, asking questions for several minutes before "I" became aware. There is some sort of doer, but it isn't the figmentory me. I mentioned this before, the body responds to perceived danger and then is the only time I notice any intention needing to be exerted to prevent the meat suit from doing harm.
You ask: Try looking at some very ordinary thing you do everyday....like typing.. like walking, driving..
Look at it while you are doing it. Can you find an entity directing things...
or is the movement just happening?
I Answer: No, I can't. The "I" with which I have identified is not the doer. But doing is happening, or appears to be, so who is the cause of it, one wonders.
It doesn't look like the I is in control of the body either.
I ask you, who or what is the cause of it?
As I had mentioned, we have had some powerful responses to people just reading Ilona's little piece.Understand, I am here because the world has felt like a dream to me for many years. I have noticed that many people seem like props in that they seem to show up just when I either don't want them to, or need them to do so. There is this strange serendipity in which I have come to trust, even when things look bad, I feel detached. Time slips into slow motion and I can handle a near car wreck: BUT IT'S NOT "ME" DOING THE HANDLING. This is why I ask if the shift could occur and one not really notice it. I feel like a character in someone else's play and, outside of being perplexed by the apparent pointlessness of it all, I am mostly at peace. I have a strong dependance upon that other presence and tend to think of "him" as "the doer".
Today, after Ilona's gem, I feel very different. Things seem more alive and vivid but nothing matters. This, I can deal with. There's no sense of urgency. In fact, I don't much care about anything except I'd like to stay in this headspace. There's no sense of longing or loss, no real desire that things be any way other than they appear to be. Something has changed, but I've been here many times and gotten lost again in the dream. I'd like that vascillation to stop. The main difference seems to be that I am not grieving the loss of characters who never really existed. Whatever aspect of them was "real"= eternal before their death, no doubt, persists, so there's nothing to grieve. One cannot lose what wasn't ever real.
And not just a conceptual understanding...
Its almost like something is seen through.
So for the next day...take a good look as you are doing normal everyday activities.
Can you find an entity in control of things?
The I, the me, the entity, that's what maybe we're not exactly sure of.
This is what has been taken for granted for so long and believed. Is it true?
Or do things just happen? with no one really in charge?
Use the LOOKING method while doing this.
Let me know what you find out.
Here's the little koan again.. might be good to look at once in a while.
Well its a very simple thing that needs to be resolved...
There is this thought, I,... and once you see that I is just a thought
And you see that thought itself does not think
It clicks!
Its very very simple.

