Re: Inquiry with forgetmenot
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:27 pm
Hi Allen,
After Christmas will be fine! Happy holidays to you! :)
Kay
After Christmas will be fine! Happy holidays to you! :)
Kay
Liberation Unleashed Forum The Gate
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/viewtopic.php?t=8121
How does it feel to see what actually is?
When looking at emotions as sensation + thought, what’s it like, then, to just be with the ‘emotion’?
Does the label "I" contain an actual I...does it contain an actual person?
Does the label "I" itself, suggest in any way that it is an I?
Does the label "I" know anything about an I?
What does the label "I" point to? In other words, what does the word/label "I" actually refer to?
The thoughts and mental images are real only as the actual experience of arising thoughts and mental images, their ‘presence’ cannot be denied. However their contents, what they are about (like the cup) are not ‘real’, they are just fantasies. In other words, the picture/idea that thought is ‘painting’ is the content of thought, and it is fictional.
Can you see this?
Over the course of the next day, I'd like you to notice the content of thoughts. Whenever there is an arising thought or mental image, check whether its content (what it’s about) is REALLY happening, or the content is just pure imagination. Let me know how it goes.
Lovely to see that you are aware of expectations.It feels kind of peaceful to look at what actually is. The key for me is to look without expectation, to see what is really there.How does it feel to see what actually is?
And the key to emotions is being able to allow the sensations in the body all the room they need without pushing them aside or wanting them to be different. Once there is no resistance to a sensation/feeling then it transmutes.It's a bit easier to be there with difficult or unpleasant emotions. There's less of a tendency to want to push them away, although this is not always the case.When looking at emotions as sensation + thought, what’s it like, then, to just be with the ‘emotion’?
The label “I” points to AE of thought. It is simply a thought.It refers to some sensations that are thought to be in my chest, neck and head area that are supposed to be a live entity that thinks, does things, controls things, etc.What does the label "I" point to? In other words, what does the word/label "I" actually refer to?
There seems to be thoughts that are useful in helping to negotiate the illusion of ‘a person in the world’. These thoughts in and of themselves are not a problem, however, when you don’t notice the difference between what thought says about reality, and how you find reality to actually be, that is when thoughts become tricky. Knowing ABOUT something is called knowledge (ie thought). Knowing what actually IS, is direct/actual…and this is what we are looking at in this exploration. Nothing is known as in knowledge – only thought says something is known because thought seemingly knows it. What is direct/actual is known because it is what IS. But in regards to knowledge, what IS, is unknown. We will be looking at the nature of thoughts shortly.I can tell that the content of some thoughts aren’t actually happening in reality such as when there are thoughts about the past, future, certain scenarios or other fantasizing.Over the course of the next day, I'd like you to notice the content of thoughts. Whenever there is an arising thought or mental image, check whether its content (what it’s about) is REALLY happening, or the content is just pure imagination. Let me know how it goes.
But I don’t quite know what to make of a lot of other thoughts. There are a lot of opinions, commentary, speculation, ideas, thoughts about other people, etc.
Is the label or the thought the fearful self?
Does the label ‘fear’ or the thought know anything about fear, or is the word/thought just a bunch of letters?
Is the label ‘fear’ or thought itself, fearful?
Can you find anyone/anything in the word/thought itself that is fearful?
Are those arising mental images the fearful self, or are they just images that are arising and subsiding?
Can you find anyone/anything in the images that is fearful?
Does the image/outline itself know anything about ‘fear’.
And then look to see if there is anyone/anything in image that knows anything about ‘fear’ or that can be ‘fearful’.
Does the sensation itself suggest in any way that it is fear, or that it is fearful?
Does the sensation itself know anything about fear?
Can you find anyone/anything IN the sensation itself, or behind the sensation that is fearful?
Did you find anyone or anything?
Let me know how you go. What did you find when you did this exercise. What happened?
So, is there actual experience of ‘fear’, or what is actually appearing (AE) is label + sensation + colour + thoughts ABOUT fear? Is 'fear' actually known?
The label “I” points to AE of thought. It is simply a thought.
Thought points to sensations and labels them “I/body/me”; however sensations are AE of sensations and not AE of an “I/body/me”.
Do the sensations themselves suggest in any way that they are an "I/body/me"?
What is the AE of 'chest'?
What is the AE of 'neck'?
What is the AE of 'head'?
The key to any emotions is to be able to feel the sensations fully. The usual response is to push them aside, ignore them, distract ourselves from them or we try and change them. All these manoeuvrers will just keep the emotion in place to be played out in different life scenarios. Even after ‘no self’ is realised, it isn’t easy, at the beginning to sit with bodily sensations as they are usually intense as they need a few rinses to start to not be so intense. It’s about remembering to focus on our breath and to breathe normally…we normally tend to hold our breath.I'm so glad that we're getting a chance to look at negative emotions. My whole purpose in trying to see no-self is to deal with the shame issues that I suffer from. Apparently negative beliefs and emotions will be easier to release after no-self is seen.
From my understanding, trauma/negative emotions/negative beliefs from childhood can get "stuck", then other psychological parts consisting of thoughts/behaviors/emotions come in a try to protect "me" from feeling the trauma whenever it is triggered in everyday life.
Is this observing the gap difficult because your mind is perpetually busy? I am not quite getting how a gap between thoughts can cause uncertainty, unless the mind is very busy and gaps between thoughts are far and few between as thoughts are just an unending stream?As for observing the gaps between thoughts, I would like to take more time with this exercise too. I find it hard to observe the gaps. I just notice thoughts coming one after another. Sometimes when it seems like there isn't a thought present, I feel unsure about it. Then this uncertainty just becomes a thought.
Is this observing the gap difficult because your mind is perpetually busy? I am not quite getting how a gap between thoughts can cause uncertainty, unless the mind is very busy and gaps between thoughts are far and few between as thoughts are just an unending stream?
Sit quietly for about 30 minutes and notice all arising thoughts. Just let them appear as they appear. Try your best to COMPLETELY ignore what they are saying and just notice how they appear without you doing anything at all.
Where are they coming from and going to?
Did you do anything to make a particular thought or thoughts appear?
Could you have done anything to make a different thought appear at that exact moment instead?
Can you predict your next thought?
Can you select from a range of thoughts to have only pleasant thoughts?
Can you choose not to have painful, negative or fearful thoughts?
Can you pick and choose any kind of thought?
Is it possible to prevent a thought from appearing?
Can you stop thinking a thought in the middle?
It seems that thought has some logical ordered appearance, but look carefully and just notice if there is an organised sequence. Or is it just another thought that says ‘these thoughts are in sequence’ or “they take content from previous thought”, or that "one thought follows another thought"?
Yes, exactly. All that is known of thought is the knowing of itI can't tell. They don't have a location. I can only tell that they exist.Where are they coming from and going to?
I don't want you to think...I want you to LOOK. It is the looking to see what is that is the key...not just going with what one thinks one thinks!I think the answer is supposed to be no, and I can see it's a thought saying this, but sometimes it seems like I can?Can you pick and choose any kind of thought?
For example, lets say you ask me to picture an apple or any other kind of object in my mind. I'd be able to imagine it without a problem.
Yes, it SEEMS that thought is in some logical order. And thought SEEMS to make sense only because another thought says so. Without thought saying so, how can it possibly be known? We aren’t arguing whether or not thought is logical or not…it can seem logical and illogical (which are still only thoughts)l…what we are seeing is that it is simply another thought that touts thought is in some sequential order and that thought knows something! We are looking at how everything we think we know is thought based and we are learning to question thoughts instead of just believing them. If thoughts were expressed via the tweeting of birds or an unknown language, how would you know what they meant or in what order they were spoken? What meaning is given to thoughts are only just thoughts about thoughts.I can see that it's a thought saying this as well, but sometimes it seems like a stream of thoughts can make sense while at other times it seems completely random. For example, when I was doing this exercise, I was getting close to falling asleep and that's when thoughts seem to be really random. All kinds of thoughts coming out that make no sense. I notice this when I'm about to fall asleep at night too.It seems that thought has some logical ordered appearance, but look carefully and just notice if there is an organised sequence. Or is it just another thought that says ‘these thoughts are in sequence’ or “they take content from previous thought”, or that "one thought follows another thought"?
Everything you wrote above is simply AE of thought. What do those thoughts point to? Do they point to actual experience or do they point to thoughts about thoughts?Other times when I'm remembering something that happened the thoughts will just seem like a story. Or if thinking/logic is required for work etc., the thoughts seem to make sense. Or if I decided to count from 1 to 10 in my mind. Wouldn't this kind of be in a logical sequence?
Can a thought be seen, felt, smelled, tasted or heard...or is it simply known?
Can a thought ever been hidden? Can a thought be had without the knowing of it?
If I asked you to picture an apple, did you choose that thought, or did it come unbidden into the mind? If I ask you not to think of pink elephants, what happens?
Where did you go to retrieve the thought/image of the apple in order to become aware of it? Is there a storage container hidden somewhere that contains all thoughts and images from which you can then retrieve particular thoughts and images? How then do you bring it from the container to the front of the mind in order to become aware of it?
Did you have anything to do with creating the image of the apple, or it simply appeared?
Think of a 2-digit number. Why did you choose that number? Why not the previous number, or the next one? Do you know? If not, why don’t you know? If you are the thinker of thoughts then you must know how you create them. Repeat the experiment as necessary.
Everything you wrote above is simply AE of thought. What do those thoughts point to? Do they point to actual experience or do they point to thoughts about thoughts?Other times when I'm remembering something that happened the thoughts will just seem like a story. Or if thinking/logic is required for work etc., the thoughts seem to make sense. Or if I decided to count from 1 to 10 in my mind. Wouldn't this kind of be in a logical sequence?
Did any of that happen, or is it that you became aware of the thought to count from 1 to 10 without you doing anything, and counting happened also without you doing anything?
Nice! Continue becoming the witness/observer of your thoughts until it becomes like second nature. There will be times when it seems you have, once again, been caught up in the flow of thoughts...and that is okay...it will happen...just go back to observing thoughts as best as you can.I can see how all this applies to other things like choices and actions. There's no particular reason why one choice is made and not another. Or why something is done and not something else. It just what happens. I don't even know why I think or do any particular thing anymore!
Let me know how you felt when the sound was turned on. Did you get caught up in the moment with the excitement of the crowd, and/or the excitement of the commentator and his commentary of the game?
How did you feel when the sound was off and there was no commentary at all.
Is the commentary on the football game a necessity for the play to happen?
And in the same way: is the inner narration of thought a necessity for the play of life to happen?