Jens freedom

All threads where seeing happens are stored here. The complete list, sorted by guide, contains all links. The archives include threads of those that came to LU already seeing as well.
You are welcome to continue your conversation with your guide here after your name is turned blue.
User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Sun Apr 14, 2019 7:58 am

Hi Jen,

You did a very nice looking.
Getting very busy with the boat, so could only just get to my computer now! Please know any delay in response is just due to logistics.
Thank you for letting me know.
I am still at an 11 for motivation for this, and will find a way to answer you.
That’s very good :)
I feel present, sort of “relieved”. I notice not caring so much, or that outcomes, etc, don’t really matter. I am much more focused on what I am experiencing in a given moment. I feel more alert to my surroundings.
Very nice. Suffering comes only when these inner dialogs and stories are taken seriously and not seen for what they are.

I’d like to mention here, that I might have given you a wrong impression. Although I wrote that you should answer only from actual experience, this applies only to the exercises. If something comes up that you’d like to share or need help with, please feel to write about them.
V: So then, what is the thinker of thoughts?
J: A label; a fiction.
So the thinker of thoughts is a label or a fiction?
Can a label think?
Can a fiction think?
Can a thought think?


Let’s look at thoughts even more closely. Sit quietly for about 30 minutes and notice the arising thoughts. Just let them appear as they appear. Try your best to COMPLETELY ignore what they are saying and just notice how they appear, without you doing anything at all.


Did you do anything to make a particular thought or thoughts appear?
Could you have done anything to make a different thought appear at that exact moment instead?

Can you select from a range of thoughts to have only peaceful thoughts?
Can you pick and choose any kind of thought?
What can a thought do?
Does a thought have volition?
Can it manipulate other thoughts or think new thoughts?

It seems that thought has some logical ordered appearance, but look carefully and just notice if there is an organised sequence. Or is it just another thought that says ‘these thoughts are in sequence’ or “they take content from previous thought”, or that "one thought follows another thought"?


Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:23 am

Hello Vivien!
You did a very nice looking.
Thank you! The resistance is fading…..
Very nice. Suffering comes only when these inner dialogs and stories are taken seriously and not seen for what they are.

I’d like to mention here, that I might have given you a wrong impression. Although I wrote that you should answer only from actual experience, this applies only to the exercises. If something comes up that you’d like to share or need help with, please feel to write about them.
Thank you Vivien! I appreciate you saying this. I find myself sometimes becoming too mechanical and losing my genuineness, because I think I’m “trying”. I think that is what this is all about as well; allowing ourselves to just “be”.
So the thinker of thoughts is a label or a fiction?
No! I have a different experience of this now…All of life is the thinker of thoughts. All of existence. Soooo,
Can a label think?
No.
Can a fiction think?
No!
Can a thought think?
Definitely No!
Did you do anything to make a particular thought or thoughts appear?
No
Could you have done anything to make a different thought appear at that exact moment instead?
No
Can you select from a range of thoughts to have only peaceful thoughts?
No
Can you pick and choose any kind of thought?
No
What can a thought do?
Nothing
Does a thought have volition?
No a thought has no will of its own.
Can it manipulate other thoughts or think new thoughts?
No
It seems that thought has some logical ordered appearance, but look carefully and just notice if there is an organised sequence. Or is it just another thought that says ‘these thoughts are in sequence’ or “they take content from previous thought”, or that "one thought follows another thought"?
Here’s how I am seeing these questions, and where I am going with this. It’s like a ripple of water on the huge expanse of ocean, thinking that the little ripple has power over the entire ocean to make it do what it wants it to do. It is just a part of the greater whole, and in its little self, cannot control, influence, choose, or have a will of its own. It might see itself as such, and believe it can do all these things, but it is just a little ripple on the water. This is how I am seeing this last line of questioning.
When I answer the above questions with mostly just “no” , my mind wants to make it into something greater, but I think it is just that simple (meaning it is just another thought, the "self" saying these thoughts are in sequence..). It’s all one big fat fantasy!! This is my direct experience at this moment!
Thank you Vivien! We cast off on Wednesday, so again, busy times but I am so grateful for you!
Jen

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:35 pm

4/15/19
Dear Vivien,
I wanted to write to you, outside of the “inquiry” aspect of our work together, to say how much this work is meaning to me. I feel as though I am becoming freer, lighter (yes, this is ALL direct experience!!), and the more I do this work with you, the more I have this sense of truly “waking up”. I know I am not completely awake yet, and have lots more work to do, LOTS!!! but there is this wonderful dawning; this feeling of true freedom that is arising within me from answering these questions with you. You know EXACTLY what to ask to take me a bit further, a bit further…or, at least this is my experience! What I notice in day to day life is a true feeling of just not being caught up in the “story”; things do of course still come up, but I have a completely different perspective and response to them, even a feeling often of a compassion, like, “oh, I see that this person, or such and such thinks it’s this way….” I find myself feeling lighter, more loving, more forgiving of EVERYTHING. I see Life Doing Itself. I feel less and less like the “doer of things”.

I just wanted to share these direct experiences with you Vivien. I know that I said I was casting off on Wednesday, which I am, but it’s funny that the “busier” I seem to be getting in life, with the so-called commitments and “things I’m supposed to do” the more my mind is focusing to this work of seeing, and not being diverted. It’s like the “tables are turning” if you know what I mean.

OK, I just needed to send this from my heart! I can’t wait til your next post!
Thank you, thank you for all of this,
Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Mon Apr 15, 2019 11:32 pm

Hi Jen,
The resistance is fading…..
That’s very good.
V: So the thinker of thoughts is a label or a fiction?
J: All of life is the thinker of thoughts. All of existence. Soooo,
What is the actual experience that ‘all of life’ is the thinker of thoughts?
What is the actual experience that ‘all of existence’ is the thinker of thoughts?


Look very closely. Is it possible that since the thinker of thought cannot be found, and it contradicts the belief that there must be a thinker of thoughts, thus a though come up saying: ‘All of life is the thinker of thoughts. All of existence’?

What if there is no thinker of thoughts?
What if thinking just happens? Or rather say thoughts just appear, without anyone or anything doing it?


Here is an interesting exercise.

Go and make a cup of tea or coffee. As you do this notice whether a 'self' does it. Also notice if there are many or any moments in the whole procedure of going to the kettle, switching it on, getting the cup (etc) when 'you' control the process?

How the decision is made what to make a cup of tea or coffee?
Do ‘you’ choose putting or not putting milk into the tea (or coffee)?
Is there a moment of choice or it happens automatically?
Do ‘you’ 'make the cup of tea (or coffee) happen' or it just happens?
Can a chooser be located?
wanted to write to you, outside of the “inquiry” aspect of our work together, to say how much this work is meaning to me. I feel as though I am becoming freer, lighter (yes, this is ALL direct experience!!), and the more I do this work with you, the more I have this sense of truly “waking up”.
I’m glad to hear that. :)
What I notice in day to day life is a true feeling of just not being caught up in the “story”; things do of course still come up, but I have a completely different perspective and response to them, even a feeling often of a compassion, like, “oh, I see that this person, or such and such thinks it’s this way….” I find myself feeling lighter, more loving, more forgiving of EVERYTHING. I see Life Doing Itself. I feel less and less like the “doer of things”.
That’s very good. But I’d like to mention here, that there will times when something deep is being triggered (like past traumas, pains) and if you practice looking with less intense things, then you you’ll be able to observe those stronger experiences similarly and not being caught up in the story (or at least not totally).

Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:09 am

Hi Vivien!
A bit occupied for next day or two! I am contemplating the questions and will respond very soon!
Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:48 am

Hi Jen,

Thank you for letting me me. I'm looking forward to your replies.

Have a nice day,
Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Thu Apr 18, 2019 1:17 pm

Hi Vivien!
Should be sorted out today with computer/wifi etc. Tried using iPhone to reply but difficult. Speak soon!
Jen

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:40 am

Hello Vivien!
Finally, back on the computer! I should have a solid day or two before going over to the Bahamas, so for now I can easily answer! It may be more intermittent after Sunday, but I am going to do my very best!
What is the actual experience that ‘all of life’ is the thinker of thoughts?
What is the actual experience that ‘all of existence’ is the thinker of thoughts?
What I am seeing happening is that the concept of any thinker at all is fading. This is my actual experience. I know intellectually there is not, so my experience of this is not full or complete, but it is becoming so. I think some of my answers below may describe this more.
Look very closely. Is it possible that since the thinker of thought cannot be found, and it contradicts the belief that there must be a thinker of thoughts, thus a though come up saying: ‘All of life is the thinker of thoughts. All of existence’?
I think what you were asking me here is, or pointing out, is that can there possibly be any thinker, at all, since we can't find one, and thus "all of life" can't be the thinker, anymore than I can be the thinker.
What if there is no thinker of thoughts?
What if thinking just happens? Or rather say thoughts just appear, without anyone or anything doing it?
YES!!!! This is what is becoming more and more apparent to me!
How the decision is made what to make a cup of tea or coffee?
There is no "decision", it just happens.
Is there a moment of choice or it happens automatically?
No, there is no moment of choice because there is no decision maker. It is all happening. I have no control over any of it.
Do ‘you’ 'make the cup of tea (or coffee) happen' or it just happens?
Yes, it just happens.
Can a chooser be located?
No

I am starting to see and really experience that all of Life just happens. The second that I start to plan something, or worry about a future event, or try to control an outcome, or remember something hurtful from the past, or even a pleasant memory, that is the illusion of "me" having anything to do with anything at all. Also, what I have been doing is just letting myself be "taken along" if you will, as part of this big river of movement of life and trusting that there is order to everything that has absolutely nothing to do with "me" individually. When I let go of wanting any kind of control, or I should say, illusion of control, then I experience "life just happening". It runs so counterintuitive to what we "think" we have to do. Now I understand and am actually experiencing "Be Not the Doer". THere is an incredible sense of peace about this. I am not completely there, because I do "forget" (it's that feeling like going back to sleep and then rousing again and saying, Oh Yeah, this isn't real!). This truly is how I am experiencing Being, and I want to become more and more awake because I believe that is what is happening!
I think I answered everything and can't wait till your next post!
Warm regards,
Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:39 am

Hi Jen,
I think what you were asking me here is, or pointing out, is that can there possibly be any thinker, at all, since we can't find one, and thus "all of life" can't be the thinker, anymore than I can be the thinker.
Exactly! So since the thinker cannot be found, thoughts come up with an explanation that then the thinker must be ‘all of life’. But this is just the content of another thought. Can you see it?

And the content of a thought is never real. The thought is there, it’s happening in reality, but what a thought is about ‘all of life’ is just a fiction, a fantasy. Is this clear?
The second that I start to plan something, or worry about a future event, or try to control an outcome, or remember something hurtful from the past, or even a pleasant memory, that is the illusion of "me" having anything to do with anything at all.
Thoughts about planning can appear, but there is no ‘planner’. Planning thoughts just happening.
Thoughts ABOUT worry and future arise, but the worry doesn’t happen to anyone.
Thoughts ABOUT controlling an outcome is there, but there is no controller.
Thought ABOUT something hurtful about the past can appear, but there is no one whom these past hurtful experiences happened to.

What comes up as you read the above comments?
THere is an incredible sense of peace about this. I am not completely there, because I do "forget" (it's that feeling like going back to sleep and then rousing again and saying, Oh Yeah, this isn't real!).
Here is a hidden expectation what we talked about before. The ‘delusion’ of the self still can arise, even after seeing no-self. It’s the result of a life-long conditioning. The ‘measurement’ of no-self doesn’t depend on not appearing ever again, but rather when it happens and looked at then it can be seen for what it is.

What you are after is the final stage of awakening which takes many years, and it’s rare compare to seeing no self. The reason for this is because it requires lots of work. And not just on work on the sense of self, but on psychological issues, triggers and traumas that hold us back.

Is it totally clear that there is no such thing a chooser?
Is it totally clear that there is no such thing as choice or free will?
If not, please write some examples when it seems to be otherwise.


Here is an exercise.
Get a sheet of paper and draw a line that divides that sheet in half. Label one half 'self' and the other side 'other'. Sit down and start a timer for 5 minutes. Every time you have a thought make a mark on the sheet. If that thought is about the self, put a mark on the self side, if it’s about something else, mark the other side. If a thought about food occurs due to feeling hungry, mark that on the self side. Any thought that refers back to a self should go on the self side. (I'm bored, I'm tired, is the door locked (my safety) that video was funny (I was amused), my back hurts, I am frightened, I wonder what is my daughter doing in school (‘my’ daughter), etc.
Let me know how you go and what you notice.

During the day, try to observe as many thoughts as you can. Particularly try to pay attention to narrating thoughts. Thoughts that are constantly narrating and judging what’s going on from the perspective of ‘me’.
Let me know what you find.

Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Sat Apr 20, 2019 4:00 am

Hello Vivien,
I was just about to write that I have a slight feeling of discouragement because I am not sure if I am making any headway with the seeing of no self, and then I realized that this was just a thought about an illusory me, that wants to cling to this illusion of not making any headway, and these kinds of thoughts are the very thing that anchor us to this illusory self. I feel like I answered my own question before I asked it.....I was BELIEVING the thought "I am not making headway", which keeps the illusion of self going!
Exactly! So since the thinker cannot be found, thoughts come up with an explanation that then the thinker must be ‘all of life’. But this is just the content of another thought. Can you see it?
Yes, another layer of thought.
And the content of a thought is never real. The thought is there, it’s happening in reality, but what a thought is about ‘all of life’ is just a fiction, a fantasy. Is this clear?
I'm having some trouble with this. I do see that the content of thought is a fiction/fantasy, but you are saying that the thought (the container of the fiction) IS happening in reality...? I guess the thought then, is like any of the other "happenings" like "eating", "seeing", "hearing", "smelling" "tasting". Are you saying it's like an "action" with nothing and no one attached to it? Is this what you mean, that it is "happening in reality"? If so, I do get this.
Thoughts about planning can appear, but there is no ‘planner’. Planning thoughts just happening.
Thoughts ABOUT worry and future arise, but the worry doesn’t happen to anyone.
Thoughts ABOUT controlling an outcome is there, but there is no controller.
Thought ABOUT something hurtful about the past can appear, but there is no one whom these past hurtful experiences happened to.

What comes up as you read the above comments?
What I see is that you are making the point that there is no I. I do "know" this, and have been experiencing this, but not all the time. When I am tied up in my "story" and think I am still the doer, then I'm in the sleeping state of not seeing that there is no self. I do not have control, don't plan anything and was never hurt by anything in the past because the reality is there is no me.
ds s
Here is a hidden expectation what we talked about before. The ‘delusion’ of the self still can arise, even after seeing no-self. It’s the result of a life-long conditioning. The ‘measurement’ of no-self doesn’t depend on not appearing ever again, but rather when it happens and looked at then it can be seen for what it is.
Yes. Right now I am having a perfect experience of this. My husband is making all kinds of noise and interruptions while I am working on responding to this, even after I told him I would like to have some time to myself., which is making me feel annoyed Here it is right here! Who is this "me" that needs space and is annoyed", I am asking myself. And here comes the self again, feeling "guilty" that I asked him for some space. I know this is a delusion of a self, but I can see and feel it arising, but I am clinging less and less to it.
What you are after is the final stage of awakening which takes many years, and it’s rare compare to seeing no self. The reason for this is because it requires lots of work. And not just on work on the sense of self, but on psychological issues, triggers and traumas that hold us back.
I think what you are saying to me here in your very kind way, is that I have a lot more work to do just to see no-self, and probably "lifetimes worth" to get to that final stage, and that maybe I am trying to get ahead of myself (still!) I think this has to do with what you said at the beginning about discipline and focus. If this is correct, then I must thank you for the reminder. :)
Is it totally clear that there is no such thing a chooser?
I am not sure because I want to say I believe this is clear, but don't know if for sure.

I
s it totally clear that there is no such thing as choice or free will?
Same answer as above.
If not, please write some examples when it seems to be otherwise.
It seems to be otherwise with my answers to the above two questions. I am seeing myself in this moment as a "chooser of what I think is the right answer" for these two questions. But , then i catch myself and say, "oh, see you think you "should" say this answer. Who is the I thinking this and what is a right answer since it is all illusory, I ask myself.
So, I think again, I have the intellectual understanding but not direct experience of this because I fall back on the old identity, and get sucked back in.
Let me know how you go and what you notice.
This was about the 5 minute exercise and the line on a sheet of paper. I thought about self and other about exactly the same amount. There really didn't seem to be a difference.
During the day, try to observe as many thoughts as you can. Particularly try to pay attention to narrating thoughts. Thoughts that are constantly narrating and judging what’s going on from the perspective of ‘me’.
Let me know what you find.
They keep coming and coming, but now I see them and know that I don't have to buy into them. They can be looked at for what they are. What you said about the container and content a couple of posts ago was very helpful for me to see that I don't have to "claim" any of these thoughts as "mine". And, I can see that the "I" who doesn't have to buy into them, is also a thought. It's that loop that keeps going if we don't question it.

Thank you, Vivien!

Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Sat Apr 20, 2019 8:50 am

Hi Jen,
I was just about to write that I have a slight feeling of discouragement because I am not sure if I am making any headway with the seeing of no self, and then I realized that this was just a thought about an illusory me, that wants to cling to this illusion of not making any headway, and these kinds of thoughts are the very thing that anchor us to this illusory self.
Yes, this is how the illusion works. But you’ve caught it. You’re doing well.
.I was BELIEVING the thought "I am not making headway", which keeps the illusion of self going!
“I was believing the thought” – What does the word ‘I’ refer to in this sentence?
What is it exactly that is believing in thoughts?
I'm having some trouble with this. I do see that the content of thought is a fiction/fantasy, but you are saying that the thought (the container of the fiction) IS happening in reality...?
Yes, when a thought is present, then it’s there. It cannot be denied that a thought has arisen (the ‘container’ itself). Similarly, when there is a mental image of a melon. The mental image is there, but what it’s about, the melon doesn’t.

Humans spend most of their time lost in thoughts, in stories. These stories consist of both thoughts and mental images plus accompanying emotions.

For example, a memory of disagreement with the boss arises. This story made of a series of thoughts and mental images, about what she said, how I felt when she said that, how I replied, then the look on her face, the anxiety felt in my stomach, the tension in the shoulders, etc.

So it cannot be denied that the story, like a movie, is going on. There are series of mental images changing from one to another, with ‘sound tracks’ of thoughts, spiced with bodily sensations (labelled as emotions).

So if we take the example of the reply movie of the disagreement with the boss, then what is real (what is really happening) and what is not?

Is there any choice in whether a story arises?
Is there any choice in whether ‘being lost in thought’ happens or not?


Please look at my previous statements below again.

Thoughts about planning can appear, but there is no ‘planner’. Planning thoughts just happening.
Thoughts ABOUT worry and future arise, but the worry doesn’t happen to anyone.
Thoughts ABOUT controlling an outcome is there, but there is no controller.
Thought ABOUT something hurtful about the past can appear, but there is no one whom these past hurtful experiences happened to.

Look at each statement one-by-one, spend some time with each, and see if those statements are true in your actual experience. Can you see all of them?
do "know" this, and have been experiencing this, but not all the time. When I am tied up in my "story" and think I am still the doer, then I'm in the sleeping state of not seeing that there is no self.
Expecting that ‘being tied up in a story’ will never happen again, is quite unrealistic. The process of ‘being tied up in a story’ (being lost in a story) is a conditioning, which was almost constantly going on up until now. Expecting that it completely stops just because no-self is seen is quite unrealistic. So being lost in the story still happens after seeing the illusion of the self. BUT, upon investigation, after each ‘waking up’ from the story, it’s seen again and again that there is no inherently existing ‘me’ in those stories. But stories will happen again and again and again. And after ‘waking up’ from them, it needs to be seen again and again and again the falsity of these stories. The more often these lookings happen after these stories, the less time it takes to ‘wake up’ from them, and eventually, gradually they will fade away. The point is not not being lost in thought. The point is to see the no-self again and again after each story has passed.
My husband is making all kinds of noise and interruptions while I am working on responding to this, even after I told him I would like to have some time to myself., which is making me feel annoyed Here it is right here! Who is this "me" that needs space and is annoyed", I am asking myself.
This is exactly what I’m talking about. As soon as there is a realization that the ‘I’ seems to be real again, investigate it. Try to find it. Look for it. Right in the middle of story. So even while the story is still playing out itself, investigate it, look for the ‘I’ to whom all of these happen.

Was there any choice in feeling annoyed?
And here comes the self again, feeling "guilty" that I asked him for some space.
All right. So the story triggered an emotion, called ‘guilt’. Emotions themselves can be investigated too.

Was there any choice in arising of guilt? If yes, what could have decided differently?

So, what is the actual experience of guilt?
How ‘guilt’ is actually felt?
I am seeing myself in this moment as a "chooser of what I think is the right answer" for these two questions. But , then i catch myself and say, "oh, see you think you "should" say this answer. Who is the I thinking this and what is a right answer since it is all illusory, I ask myself.
How do you this investigation exactly? Do you really LOOK and search for the ‘I’ who supposedly thinking this or that, or do you just try to talk in yourself or convince yourself that the self is just an illusion?

Could you please write an example how you do the looking?
This was about the 5 minute exercise and the line on a sheet of paper. I thought about self and other about exactly the same amount. There really didn't seem to be a difference.
I’d like to ask you to repeat the exercise. But this time, also try to remember some of the thoughts that go under ‘other’. Please write them down for me, so we can have a close look on them.
And, I can see that the "I" who doesn't have to buy into them, is also a thought. It's that loop that keeps going if we don't question it.
Exactly.

What I wanted to point out with the 2 exercises I gave you last time is to see that almost all (if not all) thoughts are about ‘me’. Sometimes, it’s not so obvious, but if you look really closely, then you can see it for yourself.

So please, watch for all thoughts during the day, and see if you can catch any thought that has nothing to with ‘me’, not even remotely. For example, the thought might be about ‘my mother whether how she feels on her holiday’, but this thought is still about me, since she is MY mother. And I WANT her to feel good. etc

Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:33 am

Hi Vivien,
Just a very quick reply to say I am on these questions!!!! Getting ready to go off shore, so may be a bit more delayed by day or so in response. Thank you for staying with me!!!
Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Wed Apr 24, 2019 1:37 am

All right, I'm looking forward to your reply.

Have a nice day,
Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Thu Apr 25, 2019 2:39 am

Hello Vivien!
I've answered all the questions,but want to let you know that once I am no longer on the boat, I will be able to focus much better on my answers, as currently I am on holiday and in a most unusual predicament of not being able to have the time I would like, and an extremely unpredictable schedule. I will keep doing my best to answer, however, and I am still highly motivated!
“I was believing the thought” – What does the word ‘I’ refer to in this sentence?
What is it exactly that is believing in thoughts?
I is just another thought. It was thought of a thought.
So if we take the example of the reply movie of the disagreement with the boss, then what is real (what is really happening) and what is not?
Containers of thoughts and containers of mental images are real but their contents are not.
Is there any choice in whether a story arises?
No there is no choice, the story will arise.
Is there any choice in whether ‘being lost in thought’ happens or not?
I do not think that there is actually “choice” for anything. But my mind wants to convince me that there is. My mind wants to think that it is the one choosing not to get caught up in a story. What we are taught from an early age about "free will" I am seeing is also an illusion. There is not even "free will".
Thoughts about planning can appear, but there is no ‘planner’. Planning thoughts just happening.
Thoughts ABOUT worry and future arise, but the worry doesn’t happen to anyone.
Thoughts ABOUT controlling an outcome is there, but there is no controller.
Thought ABOUT something hurtful about the past can appear, but there is no one whom these past hurtful experiences happened to.

Look at each statement one-by-one, spend some time with each, and see if those statements are true in your actual experience. Can you see all of them?
For the above question, I see all of them as statements of no-self. Of saying that there is no self. I see them true in my experience only some of the time, because the rest of the time, I think I am an I. But then I remember that I am not.
Was there any choice in being annoyed?
I don’t think so. My mind wants to believe so. Wants to believe that it is IT that made the decision to not go with the story, and change my response to my husband (thus, be the decision maker, and NOT be annoyed). But even this is the false self trying to convince itself of its existence. It’s insidious! It just doesn’t quit. “It” wants to create a separate self, over and over and over again!
Was there any choice in arising of guilt? If yes, what could have decided differently?
Like annoyance, I think guilt just happens. And again, my mind wants to think it can be a decision maker and choose not to be guilty, but in reality there is no me to be making such a decision. Like I said above, there really is no "free will". Even this is an illusion.
So, what is the actual experience of guilt?
How ‘guilt’ is actually felt?
Guilt feels like a punch in the illusory stomach of the illusory me. But as I am seeing through the story and seeing more of the no self, this feeling is fading. It will still happen, but then I catch myself being caught up in "the story", and it fades.
How do you this investigation exactly? Do you really LOOK and search for the ‘I’ who supposedly thinking this or that, or do you just try to talk in yourself or convince yourself that the self is just an illusion?
Could you please write an example how you do the looking?
For many years I just did it the first way, with trying to convince myself that the self, and everything was just an illusion, so I guess you could say by talking myself into it. Then, after reading Sri Ramana Maharshi, Who Am I in particular, it was more of a true searching of actually trying to look for an I. I will have a thought about something, and actually say, “to whom to these thoughts occur”? “To me”. Well than, who am I? Sometimes I feel like I can see through the illusion, and fear will set in when I start to actually see or sense there is nothing there.
The five minute exercise. I’d like to ask you to repeat the exercise. But this time, also try to remember some of the thoughts that go under ‘other’. Please write them down for me, so we can have a close look on them.
“I wish he’d stop stressing me out”
Miami Looks beautiful at night”
Look in the bottom of the fridge for the limes.
Is the anchor light on?
That boat sounds very close to us.
It sounds like a 747 landing.
So please, watch for all thoughts during the day, and see if you can catch any thought that has nothing to with ‘me’, not even remotely.
Yes, I can see that every thought either centers around or is in some way related to “me”. I actually can’t think of any that are not. The closest thing that comes to them not being related to me is when I am doing my Course in Miracles exercises and there is a lesson at the very end of 365 days of lessons. It says, “This holy instant would I give to you. Be You in Charge, for I would follow You, certain that your direction gives me peace. The “You” in this, is a request for the Holy Spirit to be in charge, since the Course uses Christian terminology. It is written in dualistic language but the ultimate “ending” of the course is to bring you to the place of surrender, and then finally “returning to the Heart of God. In this sense, I see the Heart of God as Life/ totality/The All, etc. This request is considered “the Holy Instant”, in which the self is non existant and the Holy Spirit is “in charge”. But even in this, it is STILL an I that is asking for the surrender.

OK, Vivien, not sure if Im really getting anywhere! I hope you are not fed up with me!

Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Thu Apr 25, 2019 4:12 am

Hi Jen,
But my mind wants to convince me that there is. My mind wants to think that it is the one choosing not to get caught up in a story.
“but my mind wants to convince me…’ – Is this really true?
“but my mind wants to convince me…’ – what does the word ‘me’ refer to in this sentence?
Where is this ‘me’ located exactly that could be convinced?
How does the ‘mind’ doing the convincing exactly?
What is the actual experience of ‘convincing’?
What is the actual experience of ‘mind’? Where is it exactly?
I see them true in my experience only some of the time, because the rest of the time, I think I am an I. But then I remember that I am not.
“because the rest of the time, I think I am an I” – where is the ‘I’ exactly located that thinks that it’s an I? Show me
“but then I remember that I am not” – What is it exactly that is doing the remembering?
Where is the thing located that is remembering?
My mind wants to believe so. Wants to believe that it is IT that made the decision to not go with the story
Can a ‘mind’ really want anything?
Where is the ‘wanter’ located exactly? Show me

You are describing the ‘mind’ as if it were a REAL ENTITY. As if it could do things, like wanting or convincing. But is this so?
“It” wants to create a separate self, over and over and over again!
Who or What wants to create a separate self?
Where is this something called “It” located exactly, that has volition and desire to create?
V: So, what is the actual experience of guilt?
How ‘guilt’ is actually felt?
J: Guilt feels like a punch in the illusory stomach of the illusory me.
This reply doesn’t come for actual experience. It’s just a thought interpretation, an analogy, the content of a thought.

What is the actual experience of guilt?
(Remember, AE is sensation, sound, sight, smell, taste, thought)
I will have a thought about something, and actually say, “to whom to these thoughts occur”? “To me”. Well than, who am I?
All right. I’d like to ask you to stop using the question of “Who am I?”. Because this question although questions the beliefs about the self, but it still assumes that there is a self, it’s just need to be figured out who or what I am.
Rather, when there is a thought appearing, search for the physical location of the self.

Look into all parts and all corners of the body, especially the chest and the head. The eyes, behind the eyes, forehead, throat, face, back of the head.
Also look into the thoughts. Is the ‘I’ in the thoughts? Is it inside the sensations? In the seeing? In the hearing?


Also try this out: Thought says that the foot is ‘down there’. So presumably you are above your foot. Where are you? Sit quietly, close your eyes, take a few breaths and locate where you feel yourself to be. Locate yourself vertically in the body, horizontally to the left or right, and depth, how far in. Feel how big you are, where you reside. Then point with a finger to ‘you’. Open your eyes, where is your finger pointing?
V: The five minute exercise. I’d like to ask you to repeat the exercise. But this time, also try to remember some of the thoughts that go under ‘other’.
J: “I wish he’d stop stressing me out”
Miami Looks beautiful at night”
Look in the bottom of the fridge for the limes.
Is the anchor light on?
That boat sounds very close to us.
It sounds like a 747 landing.
You wrote these statements under ‘others’, but most of it are actually about the ‘me’.
“I wish he’d stop stressing me out” – it’s not about him, he is stressing ME out. I WISH him to stop it. It’s all about ‘me’.
Miami Looks beautiful at night” – I am the one who judges Miami being beautiful at night. I am the one who enjoys its beauty.
“Look in the bottom of the fridge for the limes.” – Is this sentence addresses at someone to look there? Then I’m the one who instructs the other to look there.
Or was there an image of the bottom of the fridge? If so, I’m the one who needs the lime.
“Is the anchor light on?” – I am the one who is concerned
“That boat sounds very close to us.” – Close to us, and I am one of the ‘us’.
“It sounds like a 747 landing.” – this seems to be about something else, but actually I am making the judgement and comparison to a 747 landing.
The closest thing that comes to them not being related to me is when I am doing my Course in Miracles exercises and there is a lesson at the very end of 365 days of lessons.
Are you doing the ACIM parallel to this investigation? It’s not clear for me. If so, I’d like to ask you to stop it for the duration of our conversation. You can continue with it later. If you are doing some other methods, or listen or read other teachers, that just can create confusion, and also takes the time away from actually looking. Also, most of those all about gaining more intellectual knowledge.
I hope you are not fed up with me!
No, I’m not fed up with you :) just keep going.


Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/


Return to “ARCHIVES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 26 guests