This trapped me in an endless loop.
I'm laughing, because you trapped me in an argument I couldn't get out of!
Is this enough proof, that thinking about it doesn't lead anywhere? (Remember the thief-metaphore)
Is there really someone there having an argument with himself, whether he does exist or not?
Or are there just empty, ownerless thoughts floating around and telling a story about ALL that?
"All" i. e. including the that, which is apparently doing the arguing?
"I" doesn't exist, does it?
"I" does exist, but how? We cannot deny the appearance of "I", neither can we stop or alter its appearance.
But we can see it for what it is.
"I" is just an arbitrary label for a group of thoughts/thought processes.
Sí!
What thoughts "do" is pointing to something. They either point to something you can find in reality, or they point only to other thoughts (loop).
If you say "I" and LOOK at this thought, what can you find?
What does it point to?
What comes up?
Please have a thorough look at this thought and report what you find, what goes alongside it?